{
  "schema_version": "ocme-derivation-reader-v1",
  "guide_id": "derivation-mko-cauchy-theorem-finite-groups-01",
  "mko_id": "mko-cauchy-theorem-finite-groups",
  "title": {
    "zh-Hant": "prime因子的exact-order witnesses",
    "en": "Exact-order witnesses for the prime divisors"
  },
  "contract": {
    "schema_version": "ocme-derivation-guide-v0.1",
    "guide_id": "derivation-mko-cauchy-theorem-finite-groups-01",
    "source": {
      "mko_id": "mko-cauchy-theorem-finite-groups",
      "commit": "b1b2f1dcf8c50d67a93fe52d95f8eef7b3abba9f",
      "sha256": "779e8ef831907c123fc1e7039941b328b38b54af646d6a171eab7e28b476927d",
      "english_sha256": "557db8e818ba9af78d5bbcd15fb786238f5f2099b296f105fa26a68e62fd821f"
    },
    "mode": "worked_example",
    "audience_prerequisites": [
      "calc"
    ],
    "goal": {
      "zh-Hant": "此六元素群的prime divisors2、3分別有s與r的exact-order witnesses；無order6元素。",
      "en": "In this six-element group, prime divisors 2,3 have exact-order witnesses s,r; there is no element of order 6."
    },
    "givens": [
      {
        "id": "G1",
        "statement": {
          "zh-Hant": "G={e,r,r²,s,rs,r²s}，依序編碼(0,0),(1,0),(2,0),(0,1),(1,1),(2,1)。乘法(i,j)(k,l)=(i+(−1)^j k mod3,j+l mod2)。",
          "en": "G={e,r,r2,s,rs,r2s}, encoded respectively (0,0),(1,0),(2,0),(0,1),(1,1),(2,1), with (i,j)(k,l)=(i+(-1)^j*k mod3,j+l mod2)."
        }
      }
    ],
    "steps": [
      {
        "id": "S01",
        "uses": [
          "G1"
        ],
        "before_tex": "G=\\{e,r,r^2,s,rs,r^2s\\}",
        "after_tex": "\\begin{array}{c|cccccc}*&e&r&r^2&s&rs&r^2s\\\\\\hline e&e&r&r^2&s&rs&r^2s\\\\r&r&r^2&e&rs&r^2s&s\\\\r^2&r^2&e&r&r^2s&s&rs\\\\s&s&r^2s&rs&e&r^2&r\\\\rs&rs&s&r^2s&r&e&r^2\\\\r^2s&r^2s&rs&s&r^2&r&e\\\\\\end{array}",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "calc",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "將給定配對公式逐36對展開，全部輸出在同一六元素載體，沒有缺格。",
          "en": "Expand the pair formula for all 36 products; every output belongs to the same six-element carrier and no cell is missing."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "labels依序綁定六個pair，故同名r²不代表額外第七元素。",
            "en": "The six labels bind the six pairs; r^2 is not an additional seventh element."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "calc"
      },
      {
        "id": "S02",
        "uses": [
          "G1",
          "S01"
        ],
        "before_tex": "(i,j)(k,l)=(i+(-1)^jk,j+l)\\quad(\\bmod(3,2))",
        "after_tex": "((i,j)(k,l))(m,n)=(i+(-1)^jk+(-1)^{j+l}m,j+l+n)=(i,j)((k,l)(m,n));\\quad e=(0,0);\\quad(i,j)^{-1}=(-(-1)^ji,j)",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "calc",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "兩種括號的座標公式相同，證全部216 triples結合律；(0,0)兩側中性，列出的逆元兩側乘回(0,0)。",
          "en": "Both bracketings have identical coordinates, proving associativity for all 216 triples; (0,0) is a two-sided identity and the inverse formula multiplies back on both sides."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1",
            "S01"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "指數j+l只依mod2，因(−1)²=1，公式對所有代表一致；逆元清單e,r²,r,s,rs,r²s完整。",
            "en": "The sign depends only on j+l modulo 2 since (-1)^2=1; the full inverse list is e,r^2,r,s,rs,r^2s."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "calc"
      },
      {
        "id": "S03",
        "uses": [
          "G1",
          "S01",
          "S02"
        ],
        "before_tex": "|G|=6",
        "after_tex": "6=2\\cdot3,\\quad2,3\\text{ prime},\\quad2\\mid6,3\\mid6",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "calc",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "完整群有六元素，prime divisor只有2與3，兩個均符合定理前提。",
          "en": "The qualified group has six elements and prime divisors exactly 2 and 3, both meeting the theorem premise."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1",
            "S01",
            "S02"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "6也整除6但不是prime，不能把它當Cauchy的p。",
            "en": "6 divides 6 but is not prime, so it cannot be the theorem's p."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "calc"
      },
      {
        "id": "S04",
        "uses": [
          "G1",
          "S01",
          "S03"
        ],
        "before_tex": "p=2,\\quad g=s",
        "after_tex": "s^1=s\\ne e,\\quad s^2=e\\Rightarrow\\operatorname{ord}(s)=2",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "calc",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "列出全部較小正冪k=1及第2冪回返，得到exact2而非僅g²=e。",
          "en": "Check the only smaller positive exponent 1 and return at exponent 2, proving exact order 2 rather than merely g^2=e."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1",
            "S01",
            "S03"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "s與e是不同table labels，排除了order1。",
            "en": "s and e are distinct table labels, excluding order 1."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "calc"
      },
      {
        "id": "S05",
        "uses": [
          "G1",
          "S01",
          "S03"
        ],
        "before_tex": "p=3,\\quad g=r",
        "after_tex": "r^1=r\\ne e,\\quad r^2\\ne e,\\quad r^3=e\\Rightarrow\\operatorname{ord}(r)=3",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "calc",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "兩個全部較小正冪都非identity，第3冪回返，得到exact3。",
          "en": "Both smaller positive powers are nonidentity and the third returns, proving exact order 3."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1",
            "S01",
            "S03"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "只寫r³=e不夠；e也滿足同式卻只有order1。",
            "en": "r^3=e alone is insufficient: e also satisfies it but has order 1."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "calc"
      },
      {
        "id": "S06",
        "uses": [
          "G1",
          "S01",
          "S02",
          "S04",
          "S05"
        ],
        "before_tex": "g=e,r,r^2,s,rs,r^2s",
        "after_tex": "\\operatorname{ord}(g)=1,3,3,2,2,2\\text{ respectively}",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "calc",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "r²的冪為r²,r,e；三個reflection各第1冪非e、第2冪e，完整六項階表。",
          "en": "Powers of r^2 are r^2,r,e; each reflection is nonidentity at power 1 and identity at power 2, completing all six orders."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1",
            "S01",
            "S02",
            "S04",
            "S05"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "每個元素都出現一次，非只測生成元r、s。",
            "en": "Every element appears once, not just the generators r,s."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "calc"
      },
      {
        "id": "S07",
        "uses": [
          "G1",
          "S03",
          "S06"
        ],
        "before_tex": "6\\mid|G|,\\quad6\\notin\\{1,2,3\\}",
        "after_tex": "\\nexists g\\in G:\\operatorname{ord}(g)=6",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "calc",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "完整階表排除composite divisor6的元素，展示prime結論不可擴成任意divisor。",
          "en": "The complete order table excludes an element of composite order 6, showing that the prime conclusion does not extend to every divisor."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1",
            "S03",
            "S06"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "這個不存在性由六元素完整窮舉成立，不是假借Cauchy converse。",
            "en": "Nonexistence follows from exhaustive enumeration, not a supposed Cauchy converse."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "calc"
      },
      {
        "id": "S08",
        "uses": [
          "G1",
          "S03",
          "S04",
          "S05",
          "S06",
          "S07"
        ],
        "before_tex": "p\\in\\{2,3\\}\\text{ prime divisor of }6",
        "after_tex": "\\exists g\\in G:\\ g^p=e\\text{ and }g^k\\ne e\\ (1\\le k<p)",
        "relation": "implies",
        "rule": "mko_definition",
        "conditions": [],
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "兩prime各有完整exact-order witness，認證此模型的Cauchy實例。",
          "en": "Each prime has a full exact-order witness, certifying Cauchy instances in this model."
        },
        "reverse_audit": {
          "kind": "premise_audit",
          "required_ids": [
            "G1",
            "S03",
            "S04",
            "S05",
            "S06",
            "S07"
          ],
          "explanation": {
            "zh-Hant": "一般每個有限群的定理仍需一般證明；此稿不把有限表代替。",
            "en": "The theorem for all finite groups still requires a general proof, which this finite table does not replace."
          }
        },
        "leaf_basis": "mko_definition"
      }
    ],
    "result": {
      "zh-Hant": "此六元素群的prime divisors2、3分別有s與r的exact-order witnesses；無order6元素。",
      "en": "In this six-element group, prime divisors 2,3 have exact-order witnesses s,r; there is no element of order 6."
    },
    "negative_controls": [
      {
        "claim": {
          "zh-Hant": "e^3=e故e有order3。",
          "en": "e^3=e makes e order 3."
        },
        "expected": "reject",
        "reason": {
          "zh-Hant": "e^1=e，最小正回返是1。",
          "en": "e^1=e, so its least positive return is 1."
        }
      },
      {
        "claim": {
          "zh-Hant": "6整除群階所以有order6元素。",
          "en": "6 divides the group order, so an element has order 6."
        },
        "expected": "reject",
        "reason": {
          "zh-Hant": "完整六項階表沒有6。",
          "en": "The full six-entry order table contains no 6."
        }
      },
      {
        "claim": {
          "zh-Hant": "一個六元素例子已證一般Cauchy定理。",
          "en": "One six-element example proves general Cauchy."
        },
        "expected": "reject",
        "reason": {
          "zh-Hant": "只證指定model，所有群的全稱責任未被枚舉。",
          "en": "It certifies the specified model, not the quantification over all groups."
        }
      }
    ],
    "status": "candidate",
    "gaps": [],
    "verification": {
      "structure": "checked_local_script",
      "mathematics": "candidate_argument",
      "formalization": "not_formalized"
    },
    "rule_glossary": [
      {
        "id": "calc",
        "kind": "prerequisite",
        "statement": {
          "zh-Hant": "假設精確模3、模2整數算術、有限集合外延相等與群／作用的定義；不預設此運算已為群。",
          "en": "Assume exact arithmetic modulo 3 and 2, extensional finite-set equality, and definitions of groups/actions; this operation is not pre-assumed to be a group."
        }
      },
      {
        "id": "mko_definition",
        "kind": "cited",
        "statement": {
          "zh-Hant": "G須由完整Cayley table認證為有限群，p須為質數且p整除|G|。結論是存在g使g^p=e且對每個1≤k<p皆有g^k≠e，故ord(g)=p。本輪完整有限枚舉只為指定model產生element-order witness，不取代一般定理證明；不得外推為每個合數d整除|G|就必有order-d元素。",
          "en": "A complete Cayley table must certify G as a finite group, and p must be prime and divide |G|. There exists g with g^p=e while g^k≠e for every1≤k<p, hence ord(g)=p. Complete finite enumeration here supplies witnesses for a specified model, not a replacement for the general theorem proof. Do not extend the prime-divisor conclusion to every composite divisor d of |G|."
        },
        "source": {
          "mko_id": "mko-cauchy-theorem-finite-groups",
          "sha256": "779e8ef831907c123fc1e7039941b328b38b54af646d6a171eab7e28b476927d",
          "commit": "b1b2f1dcf8c50d67a93fe52d95f8eef7b3abba9f"
        }
      }
    ],
    "revision_log": [],
    "numeric_checks": [
      {
        "id": "prime2",
        "lhs": "isprime(2)",
        "rhs": "1",
        "step": "S03"
      },
      {
        "id": "prime3",
        "lhs": "isprime(3)",
        "rhs": "1",
        "step": "S03"
      }
    ]
  },
  "presentation": {
    "md_scope": {
      "zh-Hant": "完整指定有限模型的元素階窮舉，不以此取代一般Cauchy證明。",
      "en": "Complete element-order enumeration in a specified finite model, not a general Cauchy proof."
    },
    "md_symbols": [
      [
        "G",
        "六元素群載體",
        "six-element group carrier"
      ],
      [
        "r,s",
        "r³=e,s²=e,sr=r²s的labels",
        "labels with r^3=e,s^2=e,sr=r^2s"
      ],
      [
        "p",
        "prime divisor",
        "prime divisor"
      ],
      [
        "\\operatorname{ord}(g)",
        "最小正identity回返冪",
        "least positive identity-return exponent"
      ]
    ],
    "md_error_controls": [
      {
        "title": "同一群表 / Same group table",
        "zh": "全部積、逆元與cosets綁定這個完整Cayley表。",
        "en": "Bind every product, inverse and coset to this complete Cayley table."
      },
      {
        "title": "完整枚舉 / Complete enumeration",
        "zh": "任何全稱有限性質都需全載體或全稱公式，不用proper sample。",
        "en": "Every universal finite property needs the full carrier or a universal formula, not a proper sample."
      }
    ],
    "md_open_items": []
  },
  "revision": {
    "id": "ocme-new142-reader-adoption-20261021",
    "collection": "coverage-20261021",
    "source_commit": "b1b2f1dcf8c50d67a93fe52d95f8eef7b3abba9f",
    "adopted_source_sha256": "9540176dd0ce1cca78a7c16996e5fc3ace68a2130c439dd5bdcc4779f164108a",
    "original_source_sha256": "9540176dd0ce1cca78a7c16996e5fc3ace68a2130c439dd5bdcc4779f164108a",
    "owner_adopted": true,
    "bilingual_sync": "complete_source_bound",
    "formal_Lean": "NOT_RUN",
    "reader_review": "142_of_142_source_bound",
    "wording_review": "original_Lead_decisions_resolved",
    "glossary_reader_paraphrases": [],
    "independent_AI_concurrence": "SCOPED_LEAD_AND_BILINGUAL_CONTEXT_REVIEW",
    "issue_ids": [],
    "parent_manifest_sha256": "d29f4cae8229ebd24f60d496cb1d3cd4ad8c0a4dca9d44daab0c3245c544283a",
    "scope": "Owner-adopted reader revision. Lead and bilingual review concern the recorded text and premises; no new universal or Lean proof, canonical promotion or historical-label rewrite."
  }
}
