{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0001","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"32f566ad680b9b5246ca65b8e7d1a09592443b532a6bfde563d46397b88321b3","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184001,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":0}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=0. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, all-positive-naturals, No, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, all-positive-naturals, No, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0002","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b164f60dc515057f0dde34552c3252ab4cb2d49839f2dad8fb914fe8eb848e62","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184002,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":1}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=1. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, [1], No, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, [1], No, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0003","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"78e452dad5be275b4ee9d5fdff7723e15398f814f02229fedce93a961cadb61c","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184003,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=2. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(2, [1, 2], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (2, [1, 2], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0004","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"182a455d10bb693738cc1ad2527c6123e39b6361cb5d799314a2fe06fd100475","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184004,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":3}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=3. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(3, [1, 3], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (3, [1, 3], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0005","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c9712b0e4b0745553c85d5f0d6cf0bdc7b809253c0944dab6d3d22fdbe7fdfb9","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184005,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":4}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=4. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(4, [1, 2, 4], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (4, [1, 2, 4], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0006","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"258dcb3598d133292c1560a7bb6e4ac675dc7f8961567b4175abe244f3e61046","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184006,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":5}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=5. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(5, [1, 5], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [1, 5], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0007","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ee0430c8614ca85eca85e811a150bfa64627207a5b26d25b6c64252ee7ec741d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184007,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":6}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=6. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(6, [1, 2, 3, 6], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (6, [1, 2, 3, 6], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0008","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d2256153364527586eeb5a1af6c4fad46c14baee461cf00076bdb33a3dbf46ae","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184008,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":7}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=7. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(7, [1, 7], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (7, [1, 7], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0009","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"dad5b790fdb79bbb27d3631bcd65a890b17219b1407c8380c1a6d600971d296d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184009,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":8}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=8. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(8, [1, 2, 4, 8], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (8, [1, 2, 4, 8], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0010","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"6071efbefbac46aeac93804666a05e12c481812b2c0a1f6bfe69eeff1ae238f0","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184010,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":9}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=9. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(9, [1, 3, 9], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (9, [1, 3, 9], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0011","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"7d34f9eec385ca03d86ffbc850d555eae12240e8807ada29a0a6f01cd0dc798b","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184011,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":10}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=10. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(10, [1, 2, 5, 10], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (10, [1, 2, 5, 10], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0012","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ed9525896fb4ee9143e621b27f4bcf5826b4f604d7b966c67f36a6dca80bef18","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184012,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":11}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=11. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(11, [1, 11], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (11, [1, 11], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0013","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b68fa51c85b046aa75e63d8c24360b99fc900b3b796cc44a241c94bf4e6a2a9a","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184013,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":12}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=12. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(12, [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (12, [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0014","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"4111f1c8eda47ae5fd4432f02322284219445fe495a8c5828def8373aeadacc8","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184014,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":13}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=13. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(13, [1, 13], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (13, [1, 13], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0015","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"abad882c6358c58dbc1521fa45f43cf84dbc1807a4f85f0dbb338ddcbf335e5d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184015,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":14}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=14. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(14, [1, 2, 7, 14], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (14, [1, 2, 7, 14], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0016","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d87e2ddb52b24eaaebd600727689ae6c2e9a5ef7303616ff9caed238caefb725","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184016,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":15}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=15. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(15, [1, 3, 5, 15], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (15, [1, 3, 5, 15], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0017","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a000942482f8cbd92555b55130cf06c78fd0597c323f3540a8485e21915d512b","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184017,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":16}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=16. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(16, [1, 2, 4, 8, 16], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (16, [1, 2, 4, 8, 16], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0018","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"da8c54e5a818900dea1a4930ded69df5cdd16a636bb8234037719542c454044c","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184018,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":17}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=17. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(17, [1, 17], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (17, [1, 17], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0019","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"7dd112ba29b63b6c29339a38199fafb1f01d41038aa634bdcfbc198aeae13f43","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184019,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":18}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=18. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(18, [1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (18, [1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0020","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"bc8ccccc7141ba88048011a4d40b2264149c177a5bc5241d9b09f8964335b5a7","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184020,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":19}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=19. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(19, [1, 19], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (19, [1, 19], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0021","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f4070c0533635d0975f5ecba2632b56a53dde3608457bfffa8fda80076f7550a","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184021,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":20}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=20. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(20, [1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (20, [1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0022","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a340dba1a58f9ea2e3aa3275ead50d42307d5f9c8a6b2c10fcd785b6d40dbc7c","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184022,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":21}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=21. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(21, [1, 3, 7, 21], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (21, [1, 3, 7, 21], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0023","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"fef963160403719e94ebfc68d3053860eb7187068b2bc2b101e8fee47b0f447d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184023,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":22}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=22. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(22, [1, 2, 11, 22], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (22, [1, 2, 11, 22], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0024","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"98233cc02bf6996cb464f4e1d53b3a9efca484f0fc94e34fc60fefeb00da09d3","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184024,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":23}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=23. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(23, [1, 23], Yes, Yes)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (23, [1, 23], Yes, Yes)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0025","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"28df82860bb486e69ae7c715065a5a5a9235349f913d579b55d8943d883c4aae","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification","seed":202610184025,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-divisor-classification/{\"p\":24}"},"fields":{"title":"Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. p=24. Give (p, positive divisors in increasing order or all-positive-naturals for p=0, p≥2?, prime?).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(24, [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24], Yes, No)","explanation":"Retain the lower-bound guard separately from the complete divisor inventory. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (24, [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24], Yes, No)."},"skills":["Complete Positive Divisors and Prime Qualification"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0026","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"eff0b47db2cac8977d574d2465efc54620f1909a6d4bcf3bc2d0930132e9f98e","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184026,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":0}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=0. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, not-applicable, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, not-applicable, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0027","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"4780e0701869f485ad2923dc1f8a089cfa13a420ff579ac2965bae3dc9fda970","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184027,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":1}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=1. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, not-applicable, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, not-applicable, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0028","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"6b2205497373842f072fdb76527399885ebac0a18c18aa58e11cfb67581968dc","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184028,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=2. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(2, 2, Yes)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (2, 2, Yes)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0029","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"6a2776204241784bce9f2e4e9c4188f96e383f0a72da2c8477287df26e896c29","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184029,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":33}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=33. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(33, 3, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (33, 3, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0030","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"bc0564d64589dfa6f0c42cfaba7f0de64796635e47ae0a2b8b6d85bd302a54b3","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184030,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":34}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=34. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(34, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (34, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0031","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0d4d48ec9ec8a61eed377c547808d93165ccf76b1ce703607b6f9881d6d201d5","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184031,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":35}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=35. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(35, 5, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (35, 5, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0032","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"da7596f970946078c382126e11b628ded56a06f56521601573f8eeefc9fc7438","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184032,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":36}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=36. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(36, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (36, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0033","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8baae1afa8f8590bea1844af9fb5917514408f858ab1079e30ac9c834ed1db2a","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184033,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":37}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=37. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(37, 37, Yes)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (37, 37, Yes)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0034","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"533ace903a11a1e5ef49d7c08750e070e4de14f5b82d2fd69482987415e7a196","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184034,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":38}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=38. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(38, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (38, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0035","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c33438ae5484f4f7f3bc9b82ddd44e0792f55efb06019858fa636d6b927d8388","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184035,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":39}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=39. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(39, 3, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (39, 3, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0036","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"2504fa4c90966525806d615b23b7bae529d6e5abb38824af2439edf449624d2e","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184036,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":40}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=40. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(40, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (40, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0037","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5ddf7138be316119357974e52b00a277f8b6b2bc7bd57d00a1fac6a086a83217","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184037,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":41}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=41. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(41, 41, Yes)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (41, 41, Yes)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0038","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5372659de31a668759baa7c0930fb0e02bb68c95b9548d41c13d6a119291cba8","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184038,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":42}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=42. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(42, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (42, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0039","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"2c4153d4482a38609451bbe0e8051aed8d7233be94b69b4d096680d4b228de81","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184039,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":43}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=43. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(43, 43, Yes)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (43, 43, Yes)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0040","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ed5b8ffeec415dd6dc9bd7fd7412f091c9bb6a2416d2511ae110f901fc01bcac","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184040,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":44}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=44. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(44, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (44, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0041","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d694a5364bd28203da24e9863e5a8929c105ba471c828f622099058c0aff2c7d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184041,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":45}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=45. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(45, 3, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (45, 3, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0042","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"babe123cae1a90532e85bdf80407f76c2fa93e6baa6d7651653cda5b039e09a2","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184042,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":46}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=46. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(46, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (46, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0043","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c633fe509465c77eedaf68d7d6c87d82a71e280886a4d01df657668768e2d534","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184043,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":47}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=47. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(47, 47, Yes)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (47, 47, Yes)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0044","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"6e7ae9e67ff947881cb5b40732c16eb0a31f20aee6976cd6bfcdae947450f15d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184044,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":48}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=48. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(48, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (48, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0045","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"1a22bf9df5d9440226e8a4532212f7f4934cdd556c3d6f63c3040f59fffc55ea","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184045,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":49}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=49. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(49, 7, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (49, 7, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0046","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8866254dd80d61abc971ae164de1bedb8f02f29a398a0e7422b229b0306bcd88","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184046,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":50}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=50. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(50, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (50, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0047","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b465ab8cb0d448c85df0af816c390c4c1fbcb8251425c6f6e286e54e57c31091","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184047,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":51}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=51. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(51, 3, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (51, 3, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0048","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f850295e7bf2db4197ff1cbdb887d55665e9d09e590a46a3f6b77784a2562fe0","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184048,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":52}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=52. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(52, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (52, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0049","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5d349a11505f006d421eff974f853f276a656e414f4f83b562ee6bb466615219","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184049,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":53}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=53. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(53, 53, Yes)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (53, 53, Yes)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0050","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b36750bcfd9e320eeb452828b1838f6d5cf694a15716e0eb6ec20043b8cf2b8c","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor","seed":202610184050,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-smallest-factor/{\"n\":54}"},"fields":{"title":"Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=54. Give (n, least divisor d≥2 or not-applicable when n<2, prime?). For a prime input the least such divisor is n itself.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(54, 2, No)","explanation":"Search through the complete square-root range before concluding that the input itself is the least factor. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (54, 2, No)."},"skills":["Least Divisor at Least Two and Primality"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0051","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b1468ef158f499bf3a8de36248e7743a3dc9c05b190c9a09f09cef7029947c70","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184051,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":20}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=20, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(20, 2, Yes, 10, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (20, 2, Yes, 10, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0052","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"1dc170a1e382592cb080b6ed7412488f3f1aa213c9843a49ef1f4b6bc6d9c316","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184052,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":22}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=22, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(22, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (22, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0053","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"36d932a06f1abf30dbaa758f6c8a11f36f3a715cbb1b1a5cdc2235505bbfcc42","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184053,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":24}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=24, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(24, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (24, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0054","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"cff41c2ae0b9954723de94c7044f8c95ae315e58b3ae92ceb841a08e15279d72","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184054,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":26}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=26, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(26, 2, Yes, 13, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (26, 2, Yes, 13, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0055","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f1435c085fc9450d16bdcad94afd948df76ce75f4ac32f465469ed3ebf99a793","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184055,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":28}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=28, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(28, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (28, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0056","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"994ef07820c79ea0471c94f87080def5e664b7f330788dc086f847cfb77d73f8","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184056,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":30}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=30, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(30, 5, Yes, 6, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (30, 5, Yes, 6, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0057","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8660d3a4c8b8ba52deecfcb10ded931b931cbc474b5bd520bae9bfc8cb793c1d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184057,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":32}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=32, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(32, 2, Yes, 16, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (32, 2, Yes, 16, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0058","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c7a188d6bf2621d38feeb651e8334d1deeda047ec4382d7f0aec698cb3351708","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184058,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":34}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=34, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(34, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (34, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0059","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a45119bd091da5357f422a4453fa07109c01a0a80afb63352095a3a8ebbbee96","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184059,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":36}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=36, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(36, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (36, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0060","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f99b34300017d71d23f6f299374443d0e846db04ede2bcf248fbdf9bb5dca130","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184060,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":38}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=38, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(38, 2, Yes, 19, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (38, 2, Yes, 19, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0061","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a17529ccb3b597049ffb6f8e9861dbe7a1368d2c513c8bddcdb647eca8dd476a","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184061,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":40}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=40, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(40, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (40, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0062","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f9c833193956034a1a4d9d33f4111ccde1cd0e109bb850437ecd0fac238a3095","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184062,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":42}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=42, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(42, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (42, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0063","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"3361b2f33ff2ef08ecd9b0de8c7aafdd023f0fa06a9aba7d6b78e9b541726b84","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184063,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":44}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=44, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(44, 2, Yes, 22, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (44, 2, Yes, 22, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0064","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"98324007e34e9f67aa34f637430d0a78d4fffa92014f7afba0e71135d4e178ff","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184064,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":46}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=46, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(46, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (46, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0065","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"786788c93b5b0a459fe961ad442937df8d2ca2eb1e2ab9b8111f161620e5b4cc","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184065,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":48}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=48, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(48, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (48, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0066","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d139b7bfbbf30ed8cf3b58cd672e3ac01526a7a975626a26c6117b73f30210e2","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184066,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":50}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=50, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(50, 2, Yes, 25, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (50, 2, Yes, 25, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0067","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"898b3b6ba16733f39cbbf99a0cc57d332bfee0dbd8408fc039f3ba0e57cafc1d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184067,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":52}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=52, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(52, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (52, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0068","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"70080467c2f17920776d0135fb8fefba3294a5481833e37f32f801afa826d971","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184068,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":54}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=54, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(54, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (54, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0069","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ee81b7f69df53788970e63091cbe824906763ef85bb85369e46fbeb0485f738e","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184069,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":56}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=56, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(56, 2, Yes, 28, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (56, 2, Yes, 28, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0070","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"45a674ceb0371d82ac0d55021ae0c8fb1d577bd0038373c889b0e1a1259f5b5d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184070,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":58}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=58, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(58, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (58, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0071","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0713a1de5962e5bf30f6953867d7cc8c220d042293263d7f559d6273371219b7","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184071,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":60}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=60, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(60, 5, Yes, 12, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (60, 5, Yes, 12, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0072","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8a9ed4756ab2b33367c1e1dd82c61a6f37adfee88f50648aed631e1e369800bc","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184072,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":62}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=62, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(62, 2, Yes, 31, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (62, 2, Yes, 31, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0073","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0ea24d524b743a49fe29ed140f77b55f9a6f284b1dc4d8d8f98324c9e8d37586","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184073,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":3,\"n\":64}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=64, candidate d=3. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(64, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (64, 3, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0074","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"dbee7f2c189b7d8c0d785bc3c9b1894f17b96d27e92c801f0779c55a54ce31d1","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184074,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":5,\"n\":66}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=66, candidate d=5. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(66, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (66, 5, No, not-applicable, not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0075","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"85875051eb846726f09d14d1f677d53b484960f5a38a842c546a7a1b170f2610","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness","seed":202610184075,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-factor-witness/{\"d\":2,\"n\":68}"},"fields":{"title":"Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. n=68, candidate d=2. Give (n, d, n≥2 and 2≤d<n and d divides n?, quotient or not-applicable, composite-witness-valid/not-a-nontrivial-factor-witness).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(68, 2, Yes, 34, composite-witness-valid)","explanation":"Require all nontrivial-factor conditions before computing the quotient; a failed candidate alone does not certify primality. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (68, 2, Yes, 34, composite-witness-valid)."},"skills":["Qualify a Nontrivial Composite-Factor Witness"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0076","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"029bc3826d07dfb182b8d1af0087657c4ace32b84e4f840165684f234a7e6e61","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184076,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":20,\"lo\":0}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=0, hi=20, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 20, [2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19], 8)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 20, [2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19], 8)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0077","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"47f744eb8de48e381820b9cc00c67540f00f80451d7fc23ef2b6e5b20497fc16","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184077,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":25,\"lo\":5}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=5, hi=25, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(5, 25, [5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23], 7)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 25, [5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23], 7)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0078","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0a0cc84cce809122590e99dbb91a4dd1f3c3739f5a5307905ea1223d7371f8aa","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184078,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":30,\"lo\":10}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=10, hi=30, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(10, 30, [11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29], 6)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (10, 30, [11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29], 6)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0079","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b0c5adc2bb8a75b6b12f051d24ee6fa7a9430e4e0cf1d444446856e2bf197551","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184079,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":35,\"lo\":15}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=15, hi=35, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(15, 35, [17, 19, 23, 29, 31], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (15, 35, [17, 19, 23, 29, 31], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0080","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a7ce8c8fff3e8fe2f530715c00d60a9d1ef667a1e143f72b06047f10a82309c3","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184080,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":40,\"lo\":20}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=20, hi=40, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(20, 40, [23, 29, 31, 37], 4)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (20, 40, [23, 29, 31, 37], 4)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0081","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f62625a8f220a3b656dca3a92fe9d9daa260326903bd934be745000071606f42","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184081,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":45,\"lo\":25}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=25, hi=45, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(25, 45, [29, 31, 37, 41, 43], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (25, 45, [29, 31, 37, 41, 43], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0082","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"13b3d15d2cc38c63372f05ccefa26cfe23b216cb174723f2f7271b9d061a26d6","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184082,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":50,\"lo\":30}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=30, hi=50, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(30, 50, [31, 37, 41, 43, 47], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (30, 50, [31, 37, 41, 43, 47], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0083","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"4ce6a0618fddbcd5d89e825a13a014ee0b91fd049db65f7308b0167aca1858bb","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184083,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":55,\"lo\":35}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=35, hi=55, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(35, 55, [37, 41, 43, 47, 53], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (35, 55, [37, 41, 43, 47, 53], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0084","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"edf73cca162a8759251477d42367f976aee89d226081479af606fdf1e3183983","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184084,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":60,\"lo\":40}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=40, hi=60, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(40, 60, [41, 43, 47, 53, 59], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (40, 60, [41, 43, 47, 53, 59], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0085","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"dece586da79a15cfe3529ed4e0ab0f6768c2b3d094722cfa771a0471b410a448","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184085,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":65,\"lo\":45}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=45, hi=65, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(45, 65, [47, 53, 59, 61], 4)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (45, 65, [47, 53, 59, 61], 4)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0086","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"cd782f2e214cc94c6ab2592f0838469a0b8a2e55b5eb69d256117c1a0412653e","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184086,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":70,\"lo\":50}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=50, hi=70, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(50, 70, [53, 59, 61, 67], 4)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (50, 70, [53, 59, 61, 67], 4)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0087","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8dddc08a253c7897cee500e9be97a23b77628bb804ec02adb4c45e138b16394c","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184087,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":75,\"lo\":55}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=55, hi=75, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(55, 75, [59, 61, 67, 71, 73], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (55, 75, [59, 61, 67, 71, 73], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0088","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"e7f423eaea0b406bba8f8efda7a9088024223370364c2538bbea3da35c5c573a","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184088,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":80,\"lo\":60}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=60, hi=80, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(60, 80, [61, 67, 71, 73, 79], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (60, 80, [61, 67, 71, 73, 79], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0089","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0c511135a5d1c27a789a8a723a789b2d478f6009193f1b654a570f158663532a","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184089,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":85,\"lo\":65}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=65, hi=85, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(65, 85, [67, 71, 73, 79, 83], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (65, 85, [67, 71, 73, 79, 83], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0090","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d912812999217441ed1373d34e2dfb680e6c56ca4a30cf38b29fab41e7cc27c1","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184090,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":90,\"lo\":70}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=70, hi=90, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(70, 90, [71, 73, 79, 83, 89], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (70, 90, [71, 73, 79, 83, 89], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0091","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5924d3c7dbf304c9be39683a4532cc5d7dbee2467b964fc6b1beae163ab94661","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184091,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":95,\"lo\":75}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=75, hi=95, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(75, 95, [79, 83, 89], 3)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (75, 95, [79, 83, 89], 3)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0092","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b7ed0eb63e75932dc6e17fae093e9fe12a73cf1debf65150111b6eb73c97212f","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184092,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":100,\"lo\":80}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=80, hi=100, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(80, 100, [83, 89, 97], 3)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (80, 100, [83, 89, 97], 3)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0093","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"2318c0290f9c140adec69313a93596042ddebdfaa6fc213cc745667064cd7708","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184093,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":105,\"lo\":85}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=85, hi=105, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(85, 105, [89, 97, 101, 103], 4)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (85, 105, [89, 97, 101, 103], 4)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0094","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f2346cffe51ecee8aae777ce457b34fe0dc3af631138274307f6c41ccb4d2e9a","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184094,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":110,\"lo\":90}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=90, hi=110, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(90, 110, [97, 101, 103, 107, 109], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (90, 110, [97, 101, 103, 107, 109], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0095","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a85daf456237f874ba82c9f3369355c58f6c1ee076d36dd3a720b5ee727c6bcd","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184095,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":115,\"lo\":95}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=95, hi=115, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(95, 115, [97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113], 6)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (95, 115, [97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113], 6)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0096","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f21a970e84a236a9e1188f890890adf7bccf2c6a353ca856f30c3cbbf11c8c5d","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184096,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":120,\"lo\":100}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=100, hi=120, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(100, 120, [101, 103, 107, 109, 113], 5)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (100, 120, [101, 103, 107, 109, 113], 5)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0097","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"e59bbccefee3761aabc8b9640a7c5ac1bf54b0cb7aca541af36f81452134f0fb","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184097,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":125,\"lo\":105}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=105, hi=125, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(105, 125, [107, 109, 113], 3)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (105, 125, [107, 109, 113], 3)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0098","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0a52b014c8857d49df48a618e9668498ad654a56219d0c7c7d29cc07079a229b","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184098,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":130,\"lo\":110}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=110, hi=130, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(110, 130, [113, 127], 2)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (110, 130, [113, 127], 2)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0099","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"feccdde06a115f32273e2fd635e2a98fad7ef645cc4e700086979c38afe9cddc","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184099,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":135,\"lo\":115}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=115, hi=135, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(115, 135, [127, 131], 2)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (115, 135, [127, 131], 2)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-0100","batch_id":"batch-20261013-advance-20261018-r04-prime-number-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"274c4926be047c9ef5686d8300e2349ae45e24f41d35c0454ab218f34130e6c6","family_id":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory","seed":202610184100,"semantic_template":"qf-ext18-prime-interval-inventory/{\"hi\":140,\"lo\":120}"},"fields":{"title":"Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval","stem":"Use natural-number primality: 0 and 1 are not prime. Trial division must cover all candidates through the square-root bound; an incomplete sample is not a primality certificate. lo=120, hi=140, with lo≤hi and a bounded window. Give (lo, hi, every prime in [lo,hi] in increasing order, count).","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(120, 140, [127, 131, 137, 139], 4)","explanation":"Inspect every integer in the inclusive interval and retain 0/1 exclusions. Exact finite/synthetic checks are not new general formal Evidence. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (120, 140, [127, 131, 137, 139], 4)."},"skills":["Every Prime in an Inclusive Bounded Interval"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
