{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0001","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5747e4f0ae8091fb322f7bd8731adc856a799001aac8d106d7ef92dd70807a96","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032001,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[1,-2],\"limit\":[0,1],\"n\":1,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[0, 1], coefficients=[1, -2], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=1, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 0, 1/3, 0, 1/3)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 0, 1/3, 0, 1/3)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0002","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"cbad1a460310c4cd2dc7eb648c3a2f69c223cbbd68e0d44544884461c63f6e66","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032002,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[2,-3],\"limit\":[1,2],\"n\":2,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[1, 2], coefficients=[2, -3], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=2, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(2, 1, 5/4, 2, -3/4)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (2, 1, 5/4, 2, -3/4)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0003","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0314891c051f172e9a44ee1b68d48c2380a22de86537c3035b8bf3f4bc86a59f","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032003,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[3,-4],\"limit\":[2,3],\"n\":3,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[2, 3], coefficients=[3, -4], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=3, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(3, 0, 13/5, 2, 3/5)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (3, 0, 13/5, 2, 3/5)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0004","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"bedd74faa5153b33ba2548143cc57af7e1b2b24c7525c71f2e6db9b770396812","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032004,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[4,-5],\"limit\":[3,4],\"n\":4,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[3, 4], coefficients=[4, -5], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=4, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(4, 1, 19/6, 4, -5/6)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (4, 1, 19/6, 4, -5/6)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0005","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ab0841a5b34cf395e9e4daad4d22694d519c29881bdc62aef0aa50d7ad440001","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032005,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[5,-6],\"limit\":[4,5],\"n\":5,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[4, 5], coefficients=[5, -6], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=5, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(5, 0, 33/7, 4, 5/7)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 0, 33/7, 4, 5/7)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0006","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a33e955d3dcf022ec1d4479f6a1fb7fe4e7b66b2db29227d4accda530537ee0c","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032006,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[6,-7],\"limit\":[5,6],\"n\":6,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[5, 6], coefficients=[6, -7], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=6, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(6, 1, 41/8, 6, -7/8)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (6, 1, 41/8, 6, -7/8)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0007","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"121df2b081f906e3a6a66b7a7aadc45eb213ed067a695bfa6782a3736bcdecbf","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032007,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[7,-8],\"limit\":[6,7],\"n\":7,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[6, 7], coefficients=[7, -8], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=7, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(7, 0, 61/9, 6, 7/9)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (7, 0, 61/9, 6, 7/9)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0008","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"9c39ee6337b14e448b53afb3fe56f68f7a243d3e21d2b87a134cf5b011961c6e","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032008,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[8,-9],\"limit\":[7,8],\"n\":8,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[7, 8], coefficients=[8, -9], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=8, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(8, 1, 71/10, 8, -9/10)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (8, 1, 71/10, 8, -9/10)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0009","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d41358ab8b816f14b4f322665d6b3e1c80be918011292cd2e5c7b511ef31b67c","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032009,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[9,-10],\"limit\":[8,9],\"n\":9,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[8, 9], coefficients=[9, -10], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=9, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(9, 0, 97/11, 8, 9/11)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (9, 0, 97/11, 8, 9/11)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0010","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"9df40b6cb829b8784a0984b10143f771a1401f03dcce2d8a53636738cc6c2f1b","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032010,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[10,-11],\"limit\":[9,10],\"n\":10,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[9, 10], coefficients=[10, -11], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=10, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(10, 1, 109/12, 10, -11/12)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (10, 1, 109/12, 10, -11/12)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0011","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"29c243df353cc973faff4835255d1e9a75d8ce52303d33a0678e81b714766796","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032011,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[11,-12],\"limit\":[10,11],\"n\":11,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[10, 11], coefficients=[11, -12], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=11, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(11, 0, 141/13, 10, 11/13)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (11, 0, 141/13, 10, 11/13)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0012","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"fa1760348ede643cbdfcf565a3a6903897efa905d9b656bbdc7884b7736eff8e","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032012,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[12,-13],\"limit\":[11,12],\"n\":12,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[11, 12], coefficients=[12, -13], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=12, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(12, 1, 155/14, 12, -13/14)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (12, 1, 155/14, 12, -13/14)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0013","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"487eb114ecf32352cea468aecdeb768e975d08ea03e224de878e2b7af7aa9a39","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032013,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[13,-14],\"limit\":[12,13],\"n\":13,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[12, 13], coefficients=[13, -14], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=13, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(13, 0, 193/15, 12, 13/15)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (13, 0, 193/15, 12, 13/15)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0014","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"3a42208c36bb496e6896bb7b5dd5d4de2d75d81a2b83cbc80a53aac60a39a6ff","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032014,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[14,-15],\"limit\":[13,14],\"n\":14,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[13, 14], coefficients=[14, -15], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=14, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(14, 1, 209/16, 14, -15/16)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (14, 1, 209/16, 14, -15/16)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0015","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"2d3b785e427936ef879de87ae0d2d28919c4842066d3f0dbc2c4d099263cddfd","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032015,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[15,-16],\"limit\":[14,15],\"n\":15,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[14, 15], coefficients=[15, -16], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=15, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(15, 0, 253/17, 14, 15/17)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (15, 0, 253/17, 14, 15/17)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0016","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"3079868e605df72a382fa117c893ebe98daa8da700bde9d58412399741af6e0a","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032016,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[16,-17],\"limit\":[15,16],\"n\":16,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[15, 16], coefficients=[16, -17], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=16, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(16, 1, 271/18, 16, -17/18)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (16, 1, 271/18, 16, -17/18)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0017","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b857bc5a7c28ea576fc44d3c83a7977a2042793095b28d485ff9f650b81d2f93","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032017,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[17,-18],\"limit\":[16,17],\"n\":17,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[16, 17], coefficients=[17, -18], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=17, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(17, 0, 321/19, 16, 17/19)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (17, 0, 321/19, 16, 17/19)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0018","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"7359c881619cb99e7a3448ff96a958e5b456f99f25b99075c995ddf067320cd5","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032018,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[18,-19],\"limit\":[17,18],\"n\":18,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[17, 18], coefficients=[18, -19], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=18, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(18, 1, 341/20, 18, -19/20)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (18, 1, 341/20, 18, -19/20)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0019","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5ed36e2226d852f48bc6df12d65fa835ab48a82b90916eb4f7cc23c6d1c3acc8","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032019,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[19,-20],\"limit\":[18,19],\"n\":19,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[18, 19], coefficients=[19, -20], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=19, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(19, 0, 397/21, 18, 19/21)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (19, 0, 397/21, 18, 19/21)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0020","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"beba96a36d4c095bd5ee1e0fcf04d039b8f6e039a248ccf7ab15503564ea513e","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032020,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[20,-21],\"limit\":[19,20],\"n\":20,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[19, 20], coefficients=[20, -21], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=20, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(20, 1, 419/22, 20, -21/22)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (20, 1, 419/22, 20, -21/22)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0021","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"7d999b7f1e303321513ae5fd1742479254972182d238c008d40e502c0110e21b","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032021,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[21,-22],\"limit\":[20,21],\"n\":21,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[20, 21], coefficients=[21, -22], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=21, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(21, 0, 481/23, 20, 21/23)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (21, 0, 481/23, 20, 21/23)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0022","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ac75d2f910c9fc65a034454af1fc06bce565421036323ce4238969368de2e200","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032022,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[22,-23],\"limit\":[21,22],\"n\":22,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[21, 22], coefficients=[22, -23], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=22, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(22, 1, 505/24, 22, -23/24)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (22, 1, 505/24, 22, -23/24)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0023","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"de4eeba78214abb8c7d47163efbf077fcb45bbd3f4bd6581f4f263246a8d80a4","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032023,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[23,-24],\"limit\":[22,23],\"n\":23,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[22, 23], coefficients=[23, -24], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=23, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(23, 0, 573/25, 22, 23/25)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (23, 0, 573/25, 22, 23/25)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0024","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c13fe6634d844c5047cce9e6ecab33047ddd9ab2a61b10918b8260462344dbbc","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032024,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[24,-25],\"limit\":[23,24],\"n\":24,\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[23, 24], coefficients=[24, -25], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=24, point=1. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(24, 1, 599/26, 24, -25/26)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (24, 1, 599/26, 24, -25/26)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0025","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d48ffae663546f28265a15d56f8f63fd8956104740f3e452a1539544f74c6199","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate","seed":202611032025,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-evaluate/{\"coefficients\":[25,-26],\"limit\":[24,25],\"n\":25,\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[24, 25], coefficients=[25, -26], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. n=25, point=0. Give (n,point,f_n_x,limit_x,error), where error=f_n(x)−limit[x] is signed.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(25, 0, 673/27, 24, 25/27)","explanation":"Evaluate the exact rational tail at the selected point. A negative coefficient gives a negative signed error; do not replace that field with its absolute value. One value is not the full pointwise-limit proof. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (25, 0, 673/27, 24, 25/27)."},"skills":["Keep the Signed Function Error Separate from Its Absolute Bound"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0026","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"9f5558015770729964f055b42b17ef35528eff3a773003a6ad5067325a8037c5","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032026,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[1,-2],\"epsilon\":[1,10],\"limit\":[0,1],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[0, 1], coefficients=[1, -2], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/10, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/10, 9, 1/11, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/10, 9, 1/11, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0027","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ef3a713cd70ce98ed49e0d3ce7230238d053fb113ee4457b626da2cd4bc2a379","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032027,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[2,-3],\"epsilon\":[1,11],\"limit\":[1,2],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[1, 2], coefficients=[2, -3], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/11, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/11, 32, 3/34, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/11, 32, 3/34, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0028","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"95fc00527092b041f50d79eb04f2ff339c3df83ea528453c6c79b700db083c72","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032028,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[3,-4],\"epsilon\":[1,12],\"limit\":[2,3],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[2, 3], coefficients=[3, -4], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/12, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/12, 35, 3/37, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/12, 35, 3/37, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0029","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"35eb34b44cc26023dcf4956fcb4fbdedd81e8ef96738203001cd314c899513f9","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032029,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[4,-5],\"epsilon\":[1,13],\"limit\":[3,4],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[3, 4], coefficients=[4, -5], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/13, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/13, 64, 5/66, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/13, 64, 5/66, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0030","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"9b778ba5c9f44c904318bb35a5cb6b01d2896d9ad1af07d2157da7cdd14f7670","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032030,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[5,-6],\"epsilon\":[1,14],\"limit\":[4,5],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[4, 5], coefficients=[5, -6], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/14, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/14, 69, 5/71, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/14, 69, 5/71, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0031","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"81e5250250fd70cebaa04bb683f223ea3e78558910846b0e7a553ae9eb2270ce","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032031,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[6,-7],\"epsilon\":[1,15],\"limit\":[5,6],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[5, 6], coefficients=[6, -7], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/15, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/15, 104, 7/106, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/15, 104, 7/106, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0032","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"a39d1dde43c88d3241fe5d0fc649e934b4a8e5c7648b2e4637e1779a2a3b8691","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032032,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[7,-8],\"epsilon\":[1,16],\"limit\":[6,7],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[6, 7], coefficients=[7, -8], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/16, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/16, 111, 7/113, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/16, 111, 7/113, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0033","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f66f4440f33af31e08f6217b600bf214d2694872a596081af2474d709370484b","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032033,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[8,-9],\"epsilon\":[1,17],\"limit\":[7,8],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[7, 8], coefficients=[8, -9], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/17, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/17, 152, 9/154, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/17, 152, 9/154, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0034","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5b58a8158f24b03b3bfbf64a73e8358654d90e8a9e4e3120169856fa36d6f2f3","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032034,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[9,-10],\"epsilon\":[1,18],\"limit\":[8,9],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[8, 9], coefficients=[9, -10], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/18, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/18, 161, 9/163, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/18, 161, 9/163, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0035","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d8c18f40dce87d34d1aba295ac0c367e88896562efc07e8d98e2791a491328a1","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032035,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[10,-11],\"epsilon\":[1,19],\"limit\":[9,10],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[9, 10], coefficients=[10, -11], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/19, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/19, 208, 11/210, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/19, 208, 11/210, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0036","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"816fc591695e8b85ff4cb4d7e326fb3df4562da42ffd1e0cae127e8d3cf5aa5d","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032036,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[11,-12],\"epsilon\":[1,20],\"limit\":[10,11],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[10, 11], coefficients=[11, -12], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/20, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/20, 219, 11/221, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/20, 219, 11/221, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0037","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8849bb488ebbfd2d7543cf5a4a2985084d5171e793208d3d6e90b963b03a90d3","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032037,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[12,-13],\"epsilon\":[1,21],\"limit\":[11,12],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[11, 12], coefficients=[12, -13], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/21, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/21, 272, 13/274, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/21, 272, 13/274, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0038","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"bf768274a470d22e4740b1677168f23fc18303b13c46e38bc78880271929aa20","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032038,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[13,-14],\"epsilon\":[1,22],\"limit\":[12,13],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[12, 13], coefficients=[13, -14], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/22, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/22, 285, 13/287, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/22, 285, 13/287, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0039","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"4f82d2ad16489053631b2705f8fb703a99835041069e6e14c64fb4a93b78dcf7","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032039,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[14,-15],\"epsilon\":[1,23],\"limit\":[13,14],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[13, 14], coefficients=[14, -15], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/23, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/23, 344, 15/346, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/23, 344, 15/346, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0040","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"3382cbfcc05d853a1bd0b5b026d3701269e85edd3293eceaff82f255ee515456","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032040,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[15,-16],\"epsilon\":[1,24],\"limit\":[14,15],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[14, 15], coefficients=[15, -16], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/24, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/24, 359, 15/361, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/24, 359, 15/361, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0041","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f542a2c0011fe6704c310ed141053498a406298ccded4f360533c2a913490fe2","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032041,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[16,-17],\"epsilon\":[1,25],\"limit\":[15,16],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[15, 16], coefficients=[16, -17], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/25, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/25, 424, 17/426, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/25, 424, 17/426, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0042","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"f0f44dac600d9216be36f36254ef0dc48cee9ac2442582561e9d45ec31ac4676","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032042,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[17,-18],\"epsilon\":[1,26],\"limit\":[16,17],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[16, 17], coefficients=[17, -18], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/26, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/26, 441, 17/443, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/26, 441, 17/443, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0043","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"cba52940d848156e41716e5ba21116779fb3c03595ea86f650fec37df0a307b9","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032043,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[18,-19],\"epsilon\":[1,27],\"limit\":[17,18],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[17, 18], coefficients=[18, -19], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/27, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/27, 512, 19/514, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/27, 512, 19/514, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0044","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"74673f75de46d72930ccc8689c83d7bb31cf781cf51ca27de955c8313790a2a5","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032044,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[19,-20],\"epsilon\":[1,28],\"limit\":[18,19],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[18, 19], coefficients=[19, -20], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/28, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/28, 531, 19/533, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/28, 531, 19/533, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0045","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"1385061e79c211c251805746947e035474a83eabcfaf178caf0675c2126ce751","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032045,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[20,-21],\"epsilon\":[1,29],\"limit\":[19,20],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[19, 20], coefficients=[20, -21], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/29, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/29, 608, 21/610, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/29, 608, 21/610, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0046","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d03414a5512d1cfda6e98b97730380ad190f140bcca16f9c44c8a64ab8481743","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032046,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[21,-22],\"epsilon\":[1,30],\"limit\":[20,21],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[20, 21], coefficients=[21, -22], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/30, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/30, 629, 21/631, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/30, 629, 21/631, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0047","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"356766d50da727c4b3b0eccaddd2856e9f8dcce80172be12cb65b5b0ce52c1d9","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032047,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[22,-23],\"epsilon\":[1,31],\"limit\":[21,22],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[21, 22], coefficients=[22, -23], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/31, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/31, 712, 23/714, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/31, 712, 23/714, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0048","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"61824436ba1a1503174fff67511d729b485faa4b9f223241608b09c4862a01c1","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032048,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[23,-24],\"epsilon\":[1,32],\"limit\":[22,23],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[22, 23], coefficients=[23, -24], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/32, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/32, 735, 23/737, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/32, 735, 23/737, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0049","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"6284f8646b2d3bcbf20a6421a1c9013d73fb5423de89b21b8cf000ada6491082","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032049,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[24,-25],\"epsilon\":[1,33],\"limit\":[23,24],\"point\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[23, 24], coefficients=[24, -25], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/33, point=1. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, 1/33, 824, 25/826, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 1/33, 824, 25/826, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0050","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"1db2c18e6a85c8aec7777d6cba2b4d75de8bb74955a820d8475d06e03c25f86c","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness","seed":202611032050,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-epsilon-witness/{\"coefficients\":[25,-26],\"epsilon\":[1,34],\"limit\":[24,25],\"point\":0,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[24, 25], coefficients=[25, -26], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/34, point=0. Give (point,epsilon,N,error_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N), with error_at_N the absolute error bound.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(0, 1/34, 849, 25/851, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)","explanation":"Choose the least nonnegative N with |coefficient[point]|/(N+shift)<epsilon. The denominator increases thereafter, so every n≥N satisfies the strict bound. Equality at N is insufficient; a zero coefficient permits N=0. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (0, 1/34, 849, 25/851, Yes, forall_n_ge_N)."},"skills":["A Strict Pointwise Tail Witness Can Depend on the Point"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0051","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"fd54701500f8c5505f41fde53c4b6a1d5097ac00cd7aad79493e436444b4aa6e","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032051,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[1,-2],\"epsilon\":[1,10],\"limit\":[0,1],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[0, 1], coefficients=[1, -2], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/10. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/10, [[0, 9], [1, 19]], 19, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/10, [[0, 9], [1, 19]], 19, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0052","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c5d523b419e665a689f97a94479a3cee5bec07dbb1334d24d204c4fd9d95acac","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032052,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[2,-3],\"epsilon\":[1,11],\"limit\":[1,2],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[1, 2], coefficients=[2, -3], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/11. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/11, [[0, 21], [1, 32]], 32, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/11, [[0, 21], [1, 32]], 32, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0053","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"4c03cc1e9b57537e1f3848c3413ff67191246d77ddc1173bbf299c080fc77bc5","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032053,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[3,-4],\"epsilon\":[1,12],\"limit\":[2,3],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[2, 3], coefficients=[3, -4], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/12. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/12, [[0, 35], [1, 47]], 47, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/12, [[0, 35], [1, 47]], 47, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0054","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"6d15234630292b9a55f1d9effaa863abfb9366c6529061f788ec405910498672","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032054,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[4,-5],\"epsilon\":[1,13],\"limit\":[3,4],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[3, 4], coefficients=[4, -5], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/13. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/13, [[0, 51], [1, 64]], 64, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/13, [[0, 51], [1, 64]], 64, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0055","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ce1431957b4ed35ef54e0e14eff0976e61c9483a65c54cac03391436178a8443","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032055,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[5,-6],\"epsilon\":[1,14],\"limit\":[4,5],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[4, 5], coefficients=[5, -6], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/14. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/14, [[0, 69], [1, 83]], 83, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/14, [[0, 69], [1, 83]], 83, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0056","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"3ea760bd21218372a5c7e3f3679c8ea9e75e76ede1d2ea6fd8c6ec127e982e46","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032056,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[6,-7],\"epsilon\":[1,15],\"limit\":[5,6],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[5, 6], coefficients=[6, -7], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/15. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/15, [[0, 89], [1, 104]], 104, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/15, [[0, 89], [1, 104]], 104, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0057","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"81f74cf3161b7745c2a4803e265fde7718efd89ffc03b7a340269184d9bc6804","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032057,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[7,-8],\"epsilon\":[1,16],\"limit\":[6,7],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[6, 7], coefficients=[7, -8], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/16. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/16, [[0, 111], [1, 127]], 127, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/16, [[0, 111], [1, 127]], 127, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0058","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"efeaa950d122bb3eb5d7d34985d836384f8a8a7fb61becca42b5389ad0e6c317","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032058,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[8,-9],\"epsilon\":[1,17],\"limit\":[7,8],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[7, 8], coefficients=[8, -9], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/17. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/17, [[0, 135], [1, 152]], 152, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/17, [[0, 135], [1, 152]], 152, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0059","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0d0e2cb0e7cedb0879c578fa7f581bdb0bd6804840eee6ce9082f98fe5382d80","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032059,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[9,-10],\"epsilon\":[1,18],\"limit\":[8,9],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[8, 9], coefficients=[9, -10], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/18. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/18, [[0, 161], [1, 179]], 179, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/18, [[0, 161], [1, 179]], 179, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0060","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"0033d9731b66074b955588ac10d24a339c7a76b1478babf229c0387e93e742cc","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032060,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[10,-11],\"epsilon\":[1,19],\"limit\":[9,10],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[9, 10], coefficients=[10, -11], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/19. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/19, [[0, 189], [1, 208]], 208, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/19, [[0, 189], [1, 208]], 208, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0061","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d19e311b1549d79c5df5bed255f618dc66b875c3f4718b7d7be095cdc0d0945a","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032061,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[11,-12],\"epsilon\":[1,20],\"limit\":[10,11],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[10, 11], coefficients=[11, -12], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/20. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/20, [[0, 219], [1, 239]], 239, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/20, [[0, 219], [1, 239]], 239, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0062","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"78067ef4bd8c05d4c305989dc30e4686503b09a589ebd068c472aaf36669e3f6","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032062,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[12,-13],\"epsilon\":[1,21],\"limit\":[11,12],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[11, 12], coefficients=[12, -13], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/21. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/21, [[0, 251], [1, 272]], 272, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/21, [[0, 251], [1, 272]], 272, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0063","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"4e6d887748ad9d7625c5a410b3ea1b9950a9a394bff3e6454420013f841fa218","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032063,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[13,-14],\"epsilon\":[1,22],\"limit\":[12,13],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[12, 13], coefficients=[13, -14], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/22. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/22, [[0, 285], [1, 307]], 307, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/22, [[0, 285], [1, 307]], 307, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0064","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b6c0a382212a8de158dfc78ec5c34680942fdcd5f5983e06a43bb7b235d24865","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032064,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[14,-15],\"epsilon\":[1,23],\"limit\":[13,14],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[13, 14], coefficients=[14, -15], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/23. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/23, [[0, 321], [1, 344]], 344, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/23, [[0, 321], [1, 344]], 344, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0065","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8f8ef4bd62c208f9390e0ea3477048f3577ef10a32cc5788ff0e5e498774ea01","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032065,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[15,-16],\"epsilon\":[1,24],\"limit\":[14,15],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[14, 15], coefficients=[15, -16], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/24. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/24, [[0, 359], [1, 383]], 383, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/24, [[0, 359], [1, 383]], 383, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0066","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c74484aaf6620aacdade91c9c2bb22040efacd801366423c39bb2ed16e7d019c","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032066,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[16,-17],\"epsilon\":[1,25],\"limit\":[15,16],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[15, 16], coefficients=[16, -17], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/25. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/25, [[0, 399], [1, 424]], 424, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/25, [[0, 399], [1, 424]], 424, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0067","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"da3a34e6101a6ad8ac7d69ae14ebc283f1fc97935f9193b016c559e8809850a5","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032067,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[17,-18],\"epsilon\":[1,26],\"limit\":[16,17],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[16, 17], coefficients=[17, -18], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/26. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/26, [[0, 441], [1, 467]], 467, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/26, [[0, 441], [1, 467]], 467, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0068","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ea0bdca98c96edd26006682bac1272d6e07954181aed95011ea4fd9a34fd19fd","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032068,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[18,-19],\"epsilon\":[1,27],\"limit\":[17,18],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[17, 18], coefficients=[18, -19], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/27. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/27, [[0, 485], [1, 512]], 512, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/27, [[0, 485], [1, 512]], 512, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0069","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"2cf82f8ec7586d126238a5cbb02a8d1408cecf51363c588688bbe615f1873a2d","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032069,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[19,-20],\"epsilon\":[1,28],\"limit\":[18,19],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[18, 19], coefficients=[19, -20], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/28. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/28, [[0, 531], [1, 559]], 559, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/28, [[0, 531], [1, 559]], 559, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0070","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"55ddd9bd9820667e0dd5336f33de87e9f3741ffefdc8a9096ebe1edf2243a3cf","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032070,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[20,-21],\"epsilon\":[1,29],\"limit\":[19,20],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[19, 20], coefficients=[20, -21], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/29. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/29, [[0, 579], [1, 608]], 608, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/29, [[0, 579], [1, 608]], 608, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0071","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"85241e73165d56443b7425ac7507d6bf976cca9d2886b2b0e7a0568cde69a133","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032071,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[21,-22],\"epsilon\":[1,30],\"limit\":[20,21],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[20, 21], coefficients=[21, -22], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/30. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/30, [[0, 629], [1, 659]], 659, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/30, [[0, 629], [1, 659]], 659, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0072","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"1c72879978684296afec4fae65baf2e04a4b22b58768012f2e06d2948ea50647","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032072,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[22,-23],\"epsilon\":[1,31],\"limit\":[21,22],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[21, 22], coefficients=[22, -23], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/31. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/31, [[0, 681], [1, 712]], 712, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/31, [[0, 681], [1, 712]], 712, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0073","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"907363693aa106dce1ff77c48ea9a94c341fd141dc14e0794b3dfbbdd13fa7c3","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032073,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[23,-24],\"epsilon\":[1,32],\"limit\":[22,23],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[22, 23], coefficients=[23, -24], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/32. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/32, [[0, 735], [1, 767]], 767, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/32, [[0, 735], [1, 767]], 767, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0074","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"506b5315c1fa47f675e5a842b42bd2353e7202ed55513e00462dca2f31208610","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032074,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[24,-25],\"epsilon\":[1,33],\"limit\":[23,24],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[23, 24], coefficients=[24, -25], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/33. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/33, [[0, 791], [1, 824]], 824, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/33, [[0, 791], [1, 824]], 824, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0075","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"ca4edf137de1c08a7f090e7e773fdd3c3f54db601b7acbcd40d797fba22f5bd5","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max","seed":202611032075,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-domain-uniform-max/{\"coefficients\":[25,-26],\"epsilon\":[1,34],\"limit\":[24,25],\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[24, 25], coefficients=[25, -26], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. Positive epsilon=1/34. Give (epsilon,pointwise_witnesses,max_N,uniform_on_finite_domain?,finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem), with rows [point,least_N] in domain order.","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1/34, [[0, 849], [1, 883]], 883, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)","explanation":"Compute each strict pointwise witness and take the maximum over this complete finite domain. This one N works for every listed point. The argument does not justify interchanging the quantifiers on an arbitrary infinite domain. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1/34, [[0, 849], [1, 883]], 883, Yes, finite_domain_maximum_only_not_infinite_domain_theorem)."},"skills":["Take a Finite Maximum without Exchanging Infinite-Domain Quantifiers"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0076","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"913f6751a6cb6966b33ebb375c0c622cb191de065ef7b2277a81c6e7ceb204f4","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032076,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[1,-2],\"limit\":[0,1],\"prefix_length\":1,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[0, 1], coefficients=[1, -2], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=1, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(1, [[0, [1/2]], [1, [0]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, [[0, [1/2]], [1, [0]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0077","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"fae6d08d1a1b3b5add4148ac17c833830d5ad06366a2fa4f1063495fb9a248cd","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032077,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[2,-3],\"limit\":[1,2],\"prefix_length\":2,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[1, 2], coefficients=[2, -3], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=2, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(2, [[0, [2, 5/3]], [1, [1/2, 1]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (2, [[0, [2, 5/3]], [1, [1/2, 1]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0078","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"aea4906d3385f367d9979d21cd4e2132d5168ed3c9fe4858a6ec27f024422800","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032078,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[3,-4],\"limit\":[2,3],\"prefix_length\":3,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[2, 3], coefficients=[3, -4], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=3, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(3, [[0, [7/2, 3, 11/4]], [1, [1, 5/3, 2]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (3, [[0, [7/2, 3, 11/4]], [1, [1, 5/3, 2]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0079","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"9182f30206bc33ba61518cfbeb0bb6eb69941ef7252951cbefdafab0b2bf6dbc","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032079,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[4,-5],\"limit\":[3,4],\"prefix_length\":4,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[3, 4], coefficients=[4, -5], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=4, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(4, [[0, [5, 13/3, 4, 19/5]], [1, [3/2, 7/3, 11/4, 3]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (4, [[0, [5, 13/3, 4, 19/5]], [1, [3/2, 7/3, 11/4, 3]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0080","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d38cf1b020086649d3697ac7ebf43c181bcaa1aace89c0dc9580b428fcfc09d3","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032080,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[5,-6],\"limit\":[4,5],\"prefix_length\":5,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[4, 5], coefficients=[5, -6], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=5, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(5, [[0, [13/2, 17/3, 21/4, 5, 29/6]], [1, [2, 3, 7/2, 19/5, 4]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [[0, [13/2, 17/3, 21/4, 5, 29/6]], [1, [2, 3, 7/2, 19/5, 4]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0081","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"545d03e50ed5b5f9c254a0d4cb975e330eb8f204831595d654b3c1be221e475c","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032081,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[6,-7],\"limit\":[5,6],\"prefix_length\":6,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[5, 6], coefficients=[6, -7], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=6, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(6, [[0, [8, 7, 13/2, 31/5, 6, 41/7]], [1, [5/2, 11/3, 17/4, 23/5, 29/6, 5]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (6, [[0, [8, 7, 13/2, 31/5, 6, 41/7]], [1, [5/2, 11/3, 17/4, 23/5, 29/6, 5]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0082","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"e7ba96fc4bc516808890f7ca825e52d47fd9a5712293c8a1f0ac273df474ea61","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032082,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[7,-8],\"limit\":[6,7],\"prefix_length\":7,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[6, 7], coefficients=[7, -8], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=7, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(7, [[0, [19/2, 25/3, 31/4, 37/5, 43/6, 7, 55/8]], [1, [3, 13/3, 5, 27/5, 17/3, 41/7, 6]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (7, [[0, [19/2, 25/3, 31/4, 37/5, 43/6, 7, 55/8]], [1, [3, 13/3, 5, 27/5, 17/3, 41/7, 6]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0083","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"e010a0ac9373ab3eda462d68ba3ed384951d63638bea9cab8b1bd3c7875734c2","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032083,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[8,-9],\"limit\":[7,8],\"prefix_length\":8,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[7, 8], coefficients=[8, -9], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=8, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(8, [[0, [11, 29/3, 9, 43/5, 25/3, 57/7, 8, 71/9]], [1, [7/2, 5, 23/4, 31/5, 13/2, 47/7, 55/8, 7]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (8, [[0, [11, 29/3, 9, 43/5, 25/3, 57/7, 8, 71/9]], [1, [7/2, 5, 23/4, 31/5, 13/2, 47/7, 55/8, 7]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0084","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"b703b0291eca3dd9190d5d0413136ae1db47817b34ade405988cd4ccb60017ed","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032084,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[9,-10],\"limit\":[8,9],\"prefix_length\":9,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[8, 9], coefficients=[9, -10], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=9, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(9, [[0, [25/2, 11, 41/4, 49/5, 19/2, 65/7, 73/8, 9, 89/10]], [1, [4, 17/3, 13/2, 7, 22/3, 53/7, 31/4, 71/9, 8]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (9, [[0, [25/2, 11, 41/4, 49/5, 19/2, 65/7, 73/8, 9, 89/10]], [1, [4, 17/3, 13/2, 7, 22/3, 53/7, 31/4, 71/9, 8]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0085","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d6cd6254d0299369739000138682b6c20892c5ae583801937be2b48f08c1a897","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032085,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[10,-11],\"limit\":[9,10],\"prefix_length\":10,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[9, 10], coefficients=[10, -11], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=10, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(10, [[0, [14, 37/3, 23/2, 11, 32/3, 73/7, 41/4, 91/9, 10, 109/11]], [1, [9/2, 19/3, 29/4, 39/5, 49/6, 59/7, 69/8, 79/9, 89/10, 9]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (10, [[0, [14, 37/3, 23/2, 11, 32/3, 73/7, 41/4, 91/9, 10, 109/11]], [1, [9/2, 19/3, 29/4, 39/5, 49/6, 59/7, 69/8, 79/9, 89/10, 9]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0086","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c679ae61a5d6d6c218ee9d12061636473ea98cb9393fb9180b4aa6397b39804d","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032086,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[11,-12],\"limit\":[10,11],\"prefix_length\":11,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[10, 11], coefficients=[11, -12], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=11, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(11, [[0, [31/2, 41/3, 51/4, 61/5, 71/6, 81/7, 91/8, 101/9, 111/10, 11, 131/12]], [1, [5, 7, 8, 43/5, 9, 65/7, 19/2, 29/3, 49/5, 109/11, 10]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (11, [[0, [31/2, 41/3, 51/4, 61/5, 71/6, 81/7, 91/8, 101/9, 111/10, 11, 131/12]], [1, [5, 7, 8, 43/5, 9, 65/7, 19/2, 29/3, 49/5, 109/11, 10]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0087","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"9af86d7afb05ebab217c00845e1034e1338a1bad038adb447b1bf5402a3c059d","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032087,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[12,-13],\"limit\":[11,12],\"prefix_length\":12,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[11, 12], coefficients=[12, -13], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=12, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(12, [[0, [17, 15, 14, 67/5, 13, 89/7, 25/2, 37/3, 61/5, 133/11, 12, 155/13]], [1, [11/2, 23/3, 35/4, 47/5, 59/6, 71/7, 83/8, 95/9, 107/10, 119/11, 131/12, 11]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (12, [[0, [17, 15, 14, 67/5, 13, 89/7, 25/2, 37/3, 61/5, 133/11, 12, 155/13]], [1, [11/2, 23/3, 35/4, 47/5, 59/6, 71/7, 83/8, 95/9, 107/10, 119/11, 131/12, 11]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0088","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"13e30ef0000a94cd9546a59180ef0e22e934632be97e41d3a3bb1675c64602ee","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032088,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[13,-14],\"limit\":[12,13],\"prefix_length\":13,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[12, 13], coefficients=[13, -14], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=13, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(13, [[0, [37/2, 49/3, 61/4, 73/5, 85/6, 97/7, 109/8, 121/9, 133/10, 145/11, 157/12, 13, 181/14]], [1, [6, 25/3, 19/2, 51/5, 32/3, 11, 45/4, 103/9, 58/5, 129/11, 71/6, 155/13, 12]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (13, [[0, [37/2, 49/3, 61/4, 73/5, 85/6, 97/7, 109/8, 121/9, 133/10, 145/11, 157/12, 13, 181/14]], [1, [6, 25/3, 19/2, 51/5, 32/3, 11, 45/4, 103/9, 58/5, 129/11, 71/6, 155/13, 12]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0089","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"9600a1dcd7ff5670c678062bd900d510d6c37b93621e3f09c55690b8ae466b94","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032089,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[14,-15],\"limit\":[13,14],\"prefix_length\":14,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[13, 14], coefficients=[14, -15], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=14, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(14, [[0, [20, 53/3, 33/2, 79/5, 46/3, 15, 59/4, 131/9, 72/5, 157/11, 85/6, 183/13, 14, 209/15]], [1, [13/2, 9, 41/4, 11, 23/2, 83/7, 97/8, 37/3, 25/2, 139/11, 51/4, 167/13, 181/14, 13]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (14, [[0, [20, 53/3, 33/2, 79/5, 46/3, 15, 59/4, 131/9, 72/5, 157/11, 85/6, 183/13, 14, 209/15]], [1, [13/2, 9, 41/4, 11, 23/2, 83/7, 97/8, 37/3, 25/2, 139/11, 51/4, 167/13, 181/14, 13]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0090","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"1f4679a84d78072032e7296a5f0f1e761a418984da0d23a6b24ee6fcf1e8b36f","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032090,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[15,-16],\"limit\":[14,15],\"prefix_length\":15,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[14, 15], coefficients=[15, -16], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=15, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(15, [[0, [43/2, 19, 71/4, 17, 33/2, 113/7, 127/8, 47/3, 31/2, 169/11, 61/4, 197/13, 211/14, 15, 239/16]], [1, [7, 29/3, 11, 59/5, 37/3, 89/7, 13, 119/9, 67/5, 149/11, 41/3, 179/13, 97/7, 209/15, 14]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (15, [[0, [43/2, 19, 71/4, 17, 33/2, 113/7, 127/8, 47/3, 31/2, 169/11, 61/4, 197/13, 211/14, 15, 239/16]], [1, [7, 29/3, 11, 59/5, 37/3, 89/7, 13, 119/9, 67/5, 149/11, 41/3, 179/13, 97/7, 209/15, 14]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0091","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"c5fbce5de818a7ec22240eb398f7a1e65fbd89b022a7a5a9e453b1d8f5024e8a","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032091,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[16,-17],\"limit\":[15,16],\"prefix_length\":16,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[15, 16], coefficients=[16, -17], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=16, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(16, [[0, [23, 61/3, 19, 91/5, 53/3, 121/7, 17, 151/9, 83/5, 181/11, 49/3, 211/13, 113/7, 241/15, 16, 271/17]], [1, [15/2, 31/3, 47/4, 63/5, 79/6, 95/7, 111/8, 127/9, 143/10, 159/11, 175/12, 191/13, 207/14, 223/15, 239/16, 15]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (16, [[0, [23, 61/3, 19, 91/5, 53/3, 121/7, 17, 151/9, 83/5, 181/11, 49/3, 211/13, 113/7, 241/15, 16, 271/17]], [1, [15/2, 31/3, 47/4, 63/5, 79/6, 95/7, 111/8, 127/9, 143/10, 159/11, 175/12, 191/13, 207/14, 223/15, 239/16, 15]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0092","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"5e90ee9fe3501ef51559e39e5668e5de144c4d03be619e82470cf9d68e7e53f2","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032092,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[17,-18],\"limit\":[16,17],\"prefix_length\":17,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[16, 17], coefficients=[17, -18], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=17, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(17, [[0, [49/2, 65/3, 81/4, 97/5, 113/6, 129/7, 145/8, 161/9, 177/10, 193/11, 209/12, 225/13, 241/14, 257/15, 273/16, 17, 305/18]], [1, [8, 11, 25/2, 67/5, 14, 101/7, 59/4, 15, 76/5, 169/11, 31/2, 203/13, 110/7, 79/5, 127/8, 271/17, 16]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (17, [[0, [49/2, 65/3, 81/4, 97/5, 113/6, 129/7, 145/8, 161/9, 177/10, 193/11, 209/12, 225/13, 241/14, 257/15, 273/16, 17, 305/18]], [1, [8, 11, 25/2, 67/5, 14, 101/7, 59/4, 15, 76/5, 169/11, 31/2, 203/13, 110/7, 79/5, 127/8, 271/17, 16]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0093","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"7643c93958edd4e337f2208028243dd1cdeb3b8828de1e23c6db17e8948ec065","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032093,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[18,-19],\"limit\":[17,18],\"prefix_length\":18,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[17, 18], coefficients=[18, -19], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=18, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(18, [[0, [26, 23, 43/2, 103/5, 20, 137/7, 77/4, 19, 94/5, 205/11, 37/2, 239/13, 128/7, 91/5, 145/8, 307/17, 18, 341/19]], [1, [17/2, 35/3, 53/4, 71/5, 89/6, 107/7, 125/8, 143/9, 161/10, 179/11, 197/12, 215/13, 233/14, 251/15, 269/16, 287/17, 305/18, 17]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (18, [[0, [26, 23, 43/2, 103/5, 20, 137/7, 77/4, 19, 94/5, 205/11, 37/2, 239/13, 128/7, 91/5, 145/8, 307/17, 18, 341/19]], [1, [17/2, 35/3, 53/4, 71/5, 89/6, 107/7, 125/8, 143/9, 161/10, 179/11, 197/12, 215/13, 233/14, 251/15, 269/16, 287/17, 305/18, 17]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0094","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"8a8e714dfff88f0d89f9130a56a63a4fa331b022477875ae9d19b7ecaf821f63","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032094,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[19,-20],\"limit\":[18,19],\"prefix_length\":19,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[18, 19], coefficients=[19, -20], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=19, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(19, [[0, [55/2, 73/3, 91/4, 109/5, 127/6, 145/7, 163/8, 181/9, 199/10, 217/11, 235/12, 253/13, 271/14, 289/15, 307/16, 325/17, 343/18, 19, 379/20]], [1, [9, 37/3, 14, 15, 47/3, 113/7, 33/2, 151/9, 17, 189/11, 52/3, 227/13, 123/7, 53/3, 71/4, 303/17, 161/9, 341/19, 18]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (19, [[0, [55/2, 73/3, 91/4, 109/5, 127/6, 145/7, 163/8, 181/9, 199/10, 217/11, 235/12, 253/13, 271/14, 289/15, 307/16, 325/17, 343/18, 19, 379/20]], [1, [9, 37/3, 14, 15, 47/3, 113/7, 33/2, 151/9, 17, 189/11, 52/3, 227/13, 123/7, 53/3, 71/4, 303/17, 161/9, 341/19, 18]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0095","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"27555c2c22f45cfeb09e722be01c05ca0ea10d152db495bce81518af1935db2c","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032095,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[20,-21],\"limit\":[19,20],\"prefix_length\":20,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[19, 20], coefficients=[20, -21], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=20, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(20, [[0, [29, 77/3, 24, 23, 67/3, 153/7, 43/2, 191/9, 21, 229/11, 62/3, 267/13, 143/7, 61/3, 81/4, 343/17, 181/9, 381/19, 20, 419/21]], [1, [19/2, 13, 59/4, 79/5, 33/2, 17, 139/8, 53/3, 179/10, 199/11, 73/4, 239/13, 37/2, 93/5, 299/16, 319/17, 113/6, 359/19, 379/20, 19]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (20, [[0, [29, 77/3, 24, 23, 67/3, 153/7, 43/2, 191/9, 21, 229/11, 62/3, 267/13, 143/7, 61/3, 81/4, 343/17, 181/9, 381/19, 20, 419/21]], [1, [19/2, 13, 59/4, 79/5, 33/2, 17, 139/8, 53/3, 179/10, 199/11, 73/4, 239/13, 37/2, 93/5, 299/16, 319/17, 113/6, 359/19, 379/20, 19]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0096","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"4ef23942b81710893bcce078d22294d5ad09b961ee936340c972b78b4a8f9edb","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032096,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[21,-22],\"limit\":[20,21],\"prefix_length\":21,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[20, 21], coefficients=[21, -22], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=21, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(21, [[0, [61/2, 27, 101/4, 121/5, 47/2, 23, 181/8, 67/3, 221/10, 241/11, 87/4, 281/13, 43/2, 107/5, 341/16, 361/17, 127/6, 401/19, 421/20, 21, 461/22]], [1, [10, 41/3, 31/2, 83/5, 52/3, 125/7, 73/4, 167/9, 94/5, 19, 115/6, 251/13, 136/7, 293/15, 157/8, 335/17, 178/9, 377/19, 199/10, 419/21, 20]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (21, [[0, [61/2, 27, 101/4, 121/5, 47/2, 23, 181/8, 67/3, 221/10, 241/11, 87/4, 281/13, 43/2, 107/5, 341/16, 361/17, 127/6, 401/19, 421/20, 21, 461/22]], [1, [10, 41/3, 31/2, 83/5, 52/3, 125/7, 73/4, 167/9, 94/5, 19, 115/6, 251/13, 136/7, 293/15, 157/8, 335/17, 178/9, 377/19, 199/10, 419/21, 20]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0097","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"fe027e1a9519ffef4500905dd55aef586a72ba34e64304cbecf2c4718419f800","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032097,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[22,-23],\"limit\":[21,22],\"prefix_length\":22,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[21, 22], coefficients=[22, -23], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=22, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(22, [[0, [32, 85/3, 53/2, 127/5, 74/3, 169/7, 95/4, 211/9, 116/5, 23, 137/6, 295/13, 158/7, 337/15, 179/8, 379/17, 200/9, 421/19, 221/10, 463/21, 22, 505/23]], [1, [21/2, 43/3, 65/4, 87/5, 109/6, 131/7, 153/8, 175/9, 197/10, 219/11, 241/12, 263/13, 285/14, 307/15, 329/16, 351/17, 373/18, 395/19, 417/20, 439/21, 461/22, 21]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (22, [[0, [32, 85/3, 53/2, 127/5, 74/3, 169/7, 95/4, 211/9, 116/5, 23, 137/6, 295/13, 158/7, 337/15, 179/8, 379/17, 200/9, 421/19, 221/10, 463/21, 22, 505/23]], [1, [21/2, 43/3, 65/4, 87/5, 109/6, 131/7, 153/8, 175/9, 197/10, 219/11, 241/12, 263/13, 285/14, 307/15, 329/16, 351/17, 373/18, 395/19, 417/20, 439/21, 461/22, 21]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0098","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"86e48b0fe10fcc38349cfe16999186513f3bf328010666780100c5f19e443601","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032098,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[23,-24],\"limit\":[22,23],\"prefix_length\":23,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[22, 23], coefficients=[23, -24], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=23, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(23, [[0, [67/2, 89/3, 111/4, 133/5, 155/6, 177/7, 199/8, 221/9, 243/10, 265/11, 287/12, 309/13, 331/14, 353/15, 375/16, 397/17, 419/18, 441/19, 463/20, 485/21, 507/22, 23, 551/24]], [1, [11, 15, 17, 91/5, 19, 137/7, 20, 61/3, 103/5, 229/11, 21, 275/13, 149/7, 107/5, 43/2, 367/17, 65/3, 413/19, 109/5, 153/7, 241/11, 505/23, 22]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (23, [[0, [67/2, 89/3, 111/4, 133/5, 155/6, 177/7, 199/8, 221/9, 243/10, 265/11, 287/12, 309/13, 331/14, 353/15, 375/16, 397/17, 419/18, 441/19, 463/20, 485/21, 507/22, 23, 551/24]], [1, [11, 15, 17, 91/5, 19, 137/7, 20, 61/3, 103/5, 229/11, 21, 275/13, 149/7, 107/5, 43/2, 367/17, 65/3, 413/19, 109/5, 153/7, 241/11, 505/23, 22]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0099","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"93404e9d68559b48535bf0cbebcab82c86706388d3e1e0566972bfce59be54a6","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032099,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[24,-25],\"limit\":[23,24],\"prefix_length\":24,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[23, 24], coefficients=[24, -25], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=24, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(24, [[0, [35, 31, 29, 139/5, 27, 185/7, 26, 77/3, 127/5, 277/11, 25, 323/13, 173/7, 123/5, 49/2, 415/17, 73/3, 461/19, 121/5, 169/7, 265/11, 553/23, 24, 599/25]], [1, [23/2, 47/3, 71/4, 19, 119/6, 143/7, 167/8, 191/9, 43/2, 239/11, 263/12, 287/13, 311/14, 67/3, 359/16, 383/17, 407/18, 431/19, 91/4, 479/21, 503/22, 527/23, 551/24, 23]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (24, [[0, [35, 31, 29, 139/5, 27, 185/7, 26, 77/3, 127/5, 277/11, 25, 323/13, 173/7, 123/5, 49/2, 415/17, 73/3, 461/19, 121/5, 169/7, 265/11, 553/23, 24, 599/25]], [1, [23/2, 47/3, 71/4, 19, 119/6, 143/7, 167/8, 191/9, 43/2, 239/11, 263/12, 287/13, 311/14, 67/3, 359/16, 383/17, 407/18, 431/19, 91/4, 479/21, 503/22, 527/23, 551/24, 23]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
{"schema_version":"ocme-question-localization-v0.1","question_id":"q-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-0100","batch_id":"batch-20261014-advance-20261103-r02-pointwise-convergence-of-functions-foundations","locale":"en","translation_state":"ai_candidate","source":{"question_sha256":"d1641d8d63000590b8d84b0b486324bcf39e6c41662cf1d9bf07d205e5abd9e5","family_id":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary","seed":202611032100,"semantic_template":"qf-mod34-pointwise-finite-prefix-boundary/{\"coefficients\":[25,-26],\"limit\":[24,25],\"prefix_length\":25,\"shift\":2}"},"fields":{"title":"A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail","stem":"Use the same complete finite domain Fin(2)={0,…,1}, with aligned limit values=[24, 25], coefficients=[25, -26], positive shift=2, and f_n(x)=limit[x]+coefficients[x]/(n+shift) for every n≥0. Values and tail bounds are exact rationals. Pointwise witnesses may depend on both x and epsilon. A finite maximum of all pointwise witnesses gives a common witness only on this finite domain; it is not a general infinite-domain implication. A finite observed prefix alone is not a convergence certificate. prefix_length=25, beginning at n=0. Give (prefix_length,value_rows,sufficient?,finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate), with each row [point,values_in_n_order].","answer":{"kind":"expression","value":"(25, [[0, [73/2, 97/3, 121/4, 29, 169/6, 193/7, 217/8, 241/9, 53/2, 289/11, 313/12, 337/13, 361/14, 77/3, 409/16, 433/17, 457/18, 481/19, 101/4, 529/21, 553/22, 577/23, 601/24, 25, 649/26]], [1, [12, 49/3, 37/2, 99/5, 62/3, 149/7, 87/4, 199/9, 112/5, 249/11, 137/6, 23, 162/7, 349/15, 187/8, 399/17, 212/9, 449/19, 237/10, 499/21, 262/11, 549/23, 287/12, 599/25, 24]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)","explanation":"Display only the requested finite values. The No sufficiency flag concerns inference from this prefix alone, not a claim that the separately declared symbolic tail fails to converge. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (25, [[0, [73/2, 97/3, 121/4, 29, 169/6, 193/7, 217/8, 241/9, 53/2, 289/11, 313/12, 337/13, 361/14, 77/3, 409/16, 433/17, 457/18, 481/19, 101/4, 529/21, 553/22, 577/23, 601/24, 25, 649/26]], [1, [12, 49/3, 37/2, 99/5, 62/3, 149/7, 87/4, 199/9, 112/5, 249/11, 137/6, 23, 162/7, 349/15, 187/8, 399/17, 212/9, 449/19, 237/10, 499/21, 262/11, 549/23, 287/12, 599/25, 24]]], No, finite_prefix_not_pointwise_convergence_certificate)."},"skills":["A Long Prefix Still Does Not Replace the All-n Tail"],"verification_warning":"This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."}}
