{
  "schema_version": "ocme-reviewed-question-reader-v1",
  "question_id": "q-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-0063",
  "pilot_number": "R0056-28713",
  "number": 28713,
  "family_id": "qf-sequence-limit-cutoff-validity",
  "title": {
    "zh-Hant": "第 28713 題：候選自然尾界的嚴格資格",
    "en": "Question 28713: Strict Eligibility of a Candidate Tail Cutoff"
  },
  "original_question": {
    "schema_version": "ocme-question-v0.1",
    "id": "q-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-0063",
    "batch_id": "batch-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-foundations",
    "language": "zh-Hant",
    "source_mko_ids": [
      "mko-sequence-limit"
    ],
    "title_zh": "候選自然尾界的嚴格資格",
    "stem_zh": "從0起算實數列 a_n=L+(13)/(n+1)，n∈N0，d≥1。ε=3/1>0，候選 N=4 是否保證每個 n≥N 均有 |a_n−L|<ε？",
    "answer": {
      "kind": "short_text",
      "value": "是",
      "explanation_zh": "尾界交叉乘積=(13, 15)；嚴格小於=是。比較截止項的單調誤差界，嚴格小於才合格；數值相等不算 ε 內部，也不是任意數列抽樣證明。"
    },
    "difficulty": {
      "band": "undergraduate_core",
      "level": 2,
      "skills": [
        "候選自然尾界的嚴格資格"
      ]
    },
    "variant": {
      "family_id": "qf-sequence-limit-cutoff-validity",
      "seed": 202610081063,
      "parameters": {
        "c": 13,
        "d": 1,
        "eps_n": 3,
        "eps_d": 1,
        "N": 4,
        "operation": "cutoff_validity",
        "domain": "naturals_from_zero",
        "semantic_template": "qf-sequence-limit-cutoff-validity/{\"inputs\":[\"13\",\"1\",\"3/1\",\"4\"],\"operation\":\"cutoff_validity\"}"
      }
    },
    "verification": {
      "status": "candidate",
      "checks": [
        "producer_exact_integer_rational_arithmetic",
        "producer_finite_enumeration",
        "producer_source_snapshot_check",
        "producer_substantive_template_deduplication",
        "producer_json_schema"
      ],
      "warning_zh": "僅為產生端候選及自檢；主端須另做獨立驗收，不構成人工審定、普遍證明或形式 Evidence。"
    },
    "provenance": {
      "generator_role": "question_producer",
      "generator_model": "model_unknown",
      "generated_at": "2026-10-07",
      "contract_version": "ocme-question-factory-v0.1"
    }
  },
  "original_english_edition": {
    "schema_version": "ocme-question-localization-v0.1",
    "question_id": "q-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-0063",
    "batch_id": "batch-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-foundations",
    "locale": "en",
    "translation_state": "ai_candidate",
    "source": {
      "question_sha256": "b4b2dbb32b404f01a9576cc675b56f31268d8617a7f85b164e1a30456ca4b2b8",
      "family_id": "qf-sequence-limit-cutoff-validity",
      "seed": 202610081063,
      "semantic_template": "qf-sequence-limit-cutoff-validity/{\"inputs\":[\"13\",\"1\",\"3/1\",\"4\"],\"operation\":\"cutoff_validity\"}"
    },
    "fields": {
      "title": "Strict Eligibility of a Candidate Tail Cutoff",
      "stem": "For an arbitrary fixed real L, u(n)=L+(13)/(n+1) on natural indices starting at zero, with d=1≥1. With ε=3/1>0 and candidate N=4, does every n≥N have |u(n)−L|<ε, including n=N?",
      "answer": {
        "kind": "short_text",
        "value": "Yes",
        "explanation": "Check |c|q<p(N+d) exactly, giving Yes. Equality is not strict enough. The all-tail reduction uses this model's nonincreasing error, not sampling as a proof for an arbitrary sequence."
      },
      "skills": [
        "Strict Eligibility of a Candidate Tail Cutoff"
      ],
      "verification_warning": "This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."
    }
  },
  "givens": [
    {
      "id": "G001",
      "text": {
        "zh-Hant": "從0起算實數列 a_n=L+(13)/(n+1)，n∈N0，d≥1。ε=3/1>0，候選 N=4 是否保證每個 n≥N 均有 |a_n−L|<ε？",
        "en": "For an arbitrary fixed real L, u(n)=L+(13)/(n+1) on natural indices starting at zero, with d=1≥1. With ε=3/1>0 and candidate N=4, does every n≥N have |u(n)−L|<ε, including n=N?"
      }
    }
  ],
  "steps": [
    {
      "id": "S001",
      "uses": [
        "G001"
      ],
      "before": "source roles = [qf-sequence-limit-cutoff-validity, cutoff_validity]",
      "after": "derived = [strict_all_n_ge_N_tail_validity]",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "R56_source_answer_role_and_EXACT_family_interface",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "本題輸出依原scalar／set／是非／fraction角色；有理數整數保留/1。不加未宣告domain，不改中英來源、公式或題目。",
        "en": "Use the declared scalar/set/Yes-No/fraction answer role;integer fractions retain/1.Do not add an undeclared domain or change original bilingual data,formulas or questions."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "反向逐項代回原始資料與本步條件；保持索引、符號、嚴格／非嚴格邊界，不能用正確答案代替推導責任。這是候選教學與精確核對，非形式證明或發布資格。",
          "en": "Reverse-check EACH original datum and premise,retaining indices,signs and strict/non-strict boundaries.A correct final answer cannot replace the derivation obligations.This is candidate teaching/exact checking,not formal proof or publication clearance."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    },
    {
      "id": "S002",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S001"
      ],
      "before": "source roles = [13, 1, naturals_from_zero]",
      "after": "derived = [13, u(n)=L+c/(n+d), |u(n)-L|=|c|/(n+d)]",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "Sequence_WHOLE_law_and_positive_increasing_denominator",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "題設給所有自然數n>=0的完整law，d>0使n+d正且隨n增大。取絕對值先消L再得誤差，不從有限prefix猜limit；error／cutoff題的L只是任意固定實數，非新增參數。",
        "en": "The premise is the WHOLE law for every n>=0,not a finite prefix.With d>0,the denominator is positive and increasing.Subtract L before taking the absolute value.In error/cutoff tasks L is an arbitrary fixed real,not an invented input parameter."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "反向逐項代回原始資料與本步條件；保持索引、符號、嚴格／非嚴格邊界，不能用正確答案代替推導責任。這是候選教學與精確核對，非形式證明或發布資格。",
          "en": "Reverse-check EACH original datum and premise,retaining indices,signs and strict/non-strict boundaries.A correct final answer cannot replace the derivation obligations.This is candidate teaching/exact checking,not formal proof or publication clearance."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    },
    {
      "id": "S003",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S002"
      ],
      "before": "Sequence ORIGINAL absolute c times epsilon denominator := mul(13, 1)",
      "after": "Sequence ORIGINAL absolute c times epsilon denominator = 13",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "按本題原始角色作精確有理運算；SAFE只約束原輸入，衍生整數不截斷，不作浮點近似。",
        "en": "Perform exact rational arithmetic on the ORIGINAL roles.SAFE bounds raw inputs only;derived integers are unbounded and never approximated by floats."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 Sequence ORIGINAL absolute c times epsilon denominator，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute Sequence ORIGINAL absolute c times epsilon denominator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "mul",
        "inputs": [
          "13",
          "1"
        ],
        "output": "13",
        "label": "Sequence ORIGINAL absolute c times epsilon denominator"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S004",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S003"
      ],
      "before": "source roles = [13, 3]",
      "after": "derived = [4, 1, left=quot*eps_n+rem, 0<=rem<eps_n]",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "Sequence_EXACT_floor_quotient_remainder_NO_float_or_ceil",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "因en>0，可精確整除得floor與remainder；不能浮點round或改成ceil。衍生乘積／quotient可以超SAFE，只把原輸入維持SAFE。",
        "en": "Because eps_n>0,integer division yields the exact floor and remainder.No floating rounding or ceil replacement is allowed.Derived products/quotients may exceed SAFE;the raw inputs alone are SAFE-bounded."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "反向逐項代回原始資料與本步條件；保持索引、符號、嚴格／非嚴格邊界，不能用正確答案代替推導責任。這是候選教學與精確核對，非形式證明或發布資格。",
          "en": "Reverse-check EACH original datum and premise,retaining indices,signs and strict/non-strict boundaries.A correct final answer cannot replace the derivation obligations.This is candidate teaching/exact checking,not formal proof or publication clearance."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    },
    {
      "id": "S005",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S004"
      ],
      "before": "Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL N plus d := sum(4, 1)",
      "after": "Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL N plus d = 5",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "按本題原始角色作精確有理運算；SAFE只約束原輸入，衍生整數不截斷，不作浮點近似。",
        "en": "Perform exact rational arithmetic on the ORIGINAL roles.SAFE bounds raw inputs only;derived integers are unbounded and never approximated by floats."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL N plus d，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL N plus d with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "sum",
        "inputs": [
          "4",
          "1"
        ],
        "output": "5",
        "label": "Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL N plus d"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S006",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S005"
      ],
      "before": "Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL epsilon numerator times N plus d := mul(3, 5)",
      "after": "Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL epsilon numerator times N plus d = 15",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "按本題原始角色作精確有理運算；SAFE只約束原輸入，衍生整數不截斷，不作浮點近似。",
        "en": "Perform exact rational arithmetic on the ORIGINAL roles.SAFE bounds raw inputs only;derived integers are unbounded and never approximated by floats."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL epsilon numerator times N plus d，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL epsilon numerator times N plus d with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "mul",
        "inputs": [
          "3",
          "5"
        ],
        "output": "15",
        "label": "Sequence cutoff ORIGINAL epsilon numerator times N plus d"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S007",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S006"
      ],
      "before": "source roles = [13, 1, 3, 1, 4, 13, 15]",
      "after": "derived = [是, 是]",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "Sequence_cutoff_STRICT_cross_product_at_N_IFF_ALL_tail",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "在N比嚴格<，含等號時No；n>=N的分母只增不減，所以N合格即全尾合格，N失敗自身就是反例。不可偷測N+1，也不可由一次Yes推更小N最小。",
        "en": "Test STRICT < at N;equality is No.Since denominators increase for n>=N,success at N gives the whole tail,and failure at N itself is a counterexample.Do not test N+1 instead,or infer minimality from mere validity."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "反向逐項代回原始資料與本步條件；保持索引、符號、嚴格／非嚴格邊界，不能用正確答案代替推導責任。這是候選教學與精確核對，非形式證明或發布資格。",
          "en": "Reverse-check EACH original datum and premise,retaining indices,signs and strict/non-strict boundaries.A correct final answer cannot replace the derivation obligations.This is candidate teaching/exact checking,not formal proof or publication clearance."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    }
  ],
  "math_model": {
    "result": "是"
  },
  "conclusion": {
    "canonical_value": "是",
    "explanation": {
      "zh-Hant": "依上列完整代值及條件核對得到原題答案；原題編號、格式與狀態保持不變。",
      "en": "The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged."
    }
  },
  "definition_note": {
    "zh-Hant": "沿用原題明示的論域、假設與來源 MKO 定義。本題已完成第二對話數理與中英語義覆核，並由原始參數逐題獨立重算模型、答案與每個算術步驟；原題仍為 candidate。",
    "en": "Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate."
  },
  "source": {
    "input_commit": "0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db",
    "question_binding": {
      "batch_id": "batch-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-foundations",
      "batch_path": "public/data/questions/batches/batch-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-foundations/questions.jsonl",
      "batch_sha256": "124ae93c1492492eb4f3fc0395814be15a2792916927f6f1ab8aaa2eadb2c2b1",
      "original_line": 63,
      "original_line_sha256": "bc0bb20e0016eeb3c53f6d165a5c1d9040452d8929002b9d48ac4ffeca5eed73",
      "question_compact_sha256": "b4b2dbb32b404f01a9576cc675b56f31268d8617a7f85b164e1a30456ca4b2b8",
      "english_row_compact_sha256": "fe4a9c2b0ad5176ca14c623cc3bf4bfde9e05bb1754ca59c762809ddca54b709",
      "english_manifest_path": "public/data/i18n/editions/batch-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-foundations.en.json",
      "english_rows_path": "public/data/i18n/questions/batch-20261007-advance-20261008-r01-sequence-limit-foundations.en.jsonl"
    },
    "mko_bindings": {
      "mko-sequence-limit": {
        "sha256": "3018ee44ad1a41db719f4c5275fd215d436e1dc4e73fdc44993604a211486fff",
        "english_sha256": "ee964b7eba696e940cf9793cbba93912244a2bd9ed11ec3f4e647fafa8fd38ae",
        "original_path": "public/data/mko/sequence-limit.json",
        "english_path": "public/data/i18n/editions/mko-sequence-limit.en.json"
      }
    },
    "selected_manifest_sha256": "5233edba9654a6cffd8b6b2d83c932f82ded15f9c0b7c733bd049943e672acff",
    "selected_part_sha256": "e340023047850507ee3fe2ae1466d606cfcbd26849aa3bb168d53248f38097e5",
    "original_candidate_sha256": "eac0b55566334c38a14b24facfec79c04b312b835838eabdc68710e46bc73212",
    "original_candidate_line_sha256": "eac0b55566334c38a14b24facfec79c04b312b835838eabdc68710e46bc73212"
  },
  "historical_source_state": {
    "review_state": {
      "derivation": "candidate_authored_and_locally_checked",
      "source_question_state": "candidate",
      "independent_AI_or_human_review": "NOT_PERFORMED",
      "formalization": "not_formalized",
      "Lean": "NOT_RUN"
    },
    "scope_note": {
      "zh-Hant": "來源綁定教學推導候選；精確核對不等於獨立AI／人工審查或一般形式證明。原題、答案、MKO、公式、AST與歷史不變。",
      "en": "Source-bound pedagogical derivation candidate.Exact checking is not independent AI/human review or general formal proof.Original questions,answers,MKOs,formulas,ASTs and history remain unchanged."
    },
    "label": "Frozen producer metadata; current per-question review is separate below."
  },
  "revision": {
    "id": "review-20261026-010-p57",
    "review_date": "2026-10-26",
    "owner_authorized_reader_publication": true,
    "scope": "One hundred sixty family prototypes and their mathematical/bilingual reasoning variants, stems, boundary statements and every distinct explanation shape were reviewed in a context independent of the producer; parameter substitutions, source bindings, full math models, both answer strings and every arithmetic step were independently reconstructed per question from the original parameters only, with negative controls. This grouped method does not claim a separate literal AI reading of every repeated sentence or an extra AI voter.",
    "review_receipts": {
      "semantic_review_sha256": "8bbda4edbed7078634ae88342998c79bcfb95de96187fac119c3b08e0adb0bc8",
      "question_first_witness_sha256": "3edafa72d63d16a22414892b55806430e0a25b15b926d04f312550179607759f"
    },
    "status": "second_context_reviewed",
    "mathematical_semantics": true,
    "bilingual_semantics": true,
    "steps_reviewed": 7,
    "method": "family_template_semantic_review_plus_independent_per_instance_reconstruction",
    "exact_question_first_check": {
      "model_sha256": "04d3f7b1b53a2175e0fd8707acf3c0dbdc2b84c660bca89bf8f716e25f5ad050",
      "arithmetic_steps": 3
    },
    "uses_answer_as_premise": false,
    "human_review": "NOT_PERFORMED",
    "formalization": "not_formalized",
    "Lean": "NOT_RUN",
    "Canonical_truth_promotion": false,
    "authority": "Owner-authorized reviewed reader publication; original question/candidate states remain historical and unchanged."
  }
}
