{
  "schema_version": "ocme-reviewed-question-reader-v1",
  "question_id": "q-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-0031",
  "pilot_number": "R0029-15031",
  "number": 15031,
  "family_id": "qf-mod30-convprob-epsilon-witness",
  "title": {
    "zh-Hant": "第 15031 題：依機率收斂",
    "en": "Question 15031: A Strict Rational Tail Cutoff Is Different from a Finite Prefix"
  },
  "original_question": {
    "schema_version": "ocme-question-v0.1",
    "id": "q-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-0031",
    "batch_id": "batch-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-foundations",
    "language": "zh-Hant",
    "source_mko_ids": [
      "mko-convergence-in-probability"
    ],
    "title_zh": "依機率收斂",
    "stem_zh": "共同機率空間與forall epsilon tail責任。操作=convprob-epsilon-witness；資料={\"numerator\":1,\"shift\":7,\"delta\":[1,15]}。請依 [numerator,shift,delta,N,bound,pass,certificate] 欄序回答。",
    "answer": {
      "kind": "expression",
      "value": "(1, 7, 1/15, 9, 1/16, 是, forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound)",
      "explanation_zh": "Wave4第四層核對=(1, 7, 1/15, 9, 1/16, 是, forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound)；依完整明示資料重算；完整有限／symbolic tail證書不自動升格為未聲明的一般定理；finite prefix不足且只接受symbolic tail或eventual equality；不混同almost sure Lp或distribution convergence。"
    },
    "difficulty": {
      "band": "undergraduate_core",
      "level": 1,
      "skills": [
        "依機率收斂"
      ]
    },
    "variant": {
      "family_id": "qf-mod30-convprob-epsilon-witness",
      "seed": 202610307031,
      "parameters": {
        "numerator": 1,
        "shift": 7,
        "delta": [
          1,
          15
        ],
        "domain": "Symbolic_deviation_probability_tail",
        "operation": "convprob-epsilon-witness",
        "semantic_template": "qf-mod30-convprob-epsilon-witness/{\"delta\":[1,15],\"numerator\":1,\"shift\":7}"
      }
    },
    "verification": {
      "status": "candidate",
      "checks": [
        "producer_exact_finite_model",
        "producer_source_snapshot_check",
        "producer_substantive_template_deduplication",
        "producer_json_schema"
      ],
      "warning_zh": "候選須主端重算；不構成人工審定、一般域／Hilbert／martingale／無限基數／一般收斂、Lean或Evidence。"
    },
    "provenance": {
      "generator_role": "question_producer",
      "generator_model": "model_unknown",
      "generated_at": "2026-10-14",
      "contract_version": "ocme-question-factory-v0.1"
    }
  },
  "original_english_edition": {
    "schema_version": "ocme-question-localization-v0.1",
    "question_id": "q-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-0031",
    "batch_id": "batch-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-foundations",
    "locale": "en",
    "translation_state": "ai_candidate",
    "source": {
      "question_sha256": "8751cd725bead8dedcdb05a6bd09c2e65f4f948c1d5d44d5546b21e073f54b19",
      "family_id": "qf-mod30-convprob-epsilon-witness",
      "seed": 202610307031,
      "semantic_template": "qf-mod30-convprob-epsilon-witness/{\"delta\":[1,15],\"numerator\":1,\"shift\":7}"
    },
    "fields": {
      "title": "A Strict Rational Tail Cutoff Is Different from a Finite Prefix",
      "stem": "Use the declared rational deviation-probability tail p_n=1/(n+7) on nonnegative integer indices where this value belongs to[0,1], starting no earlier than max(0,numerator-shift). The common probability space and infinite-process interpretation remain declared premises, not constructions inferred from finitely many numbers. Keep exact reduced rational outputs with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Use positive target delta=1/15. Give (numerator,shift,delta,minimal_nonnegative_N,bound_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound).",
      "answer": {
        "kind": "expression",
        "value": "(1, 7, 1/15, 9, 1/16, Yes, forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound)",
        "explanation": "Solve the strict inequality c/(N+s)<delta with the least nonnegative integer N. The returned N must also belong to the valid probability domain. Increasing positive denominators then give the bound for every later index, conditionally on the declared deviation profile; no sampled prefix or infinite-process construction is substituted. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, 7, 1/15, 9, 1/16, Yes, forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound)."
      },
      "skills": [
        "A Strict Rational Tail Cutoff Is Different from a Finite Prefix"
      ],
      "verification_warning": "This is a candidate exercise. Mechanical recomputation checks only the stated conditions and this instance; it is neither a formal proof nor human review."
    }
  },
  "givens": [
    {
      "id": "G001",
      "text": {
        "zh-Hant": "共同機率空間與forall epsilon tail責任。操作=convprob-epsilon-witness；資料={\"numerator\":1,\"shift\":7,\"delta\":[1,15]}。請依 [numerator,shift,delta,N,bound,pass,certificate] 欄序回答。",
        "en": "Use the declared rational deviation-probability tail p_n=1/(n+7) on nonnegative integer indices where this value belongs to[0,1], starting no earlier than max(0,numerator-shift). The common probability space and infinite-process interpretation remain declared premises, not constructions inferred from finitely many numbers. Keep exact reduced rational outputs with positive denominators, omitting /1 for integers. Use positive target delta=1/15. Give (numerator,shift,delta,minimal_nonnegative_N,bound_at_N,strict_tail?,forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound)."
      }
    }
  ],
  "steps": [
    {
      "id": "S001",
      "uses": [
        "G001"
      ],
      "before": "positive profile parameters c=1;s=7;raw fraction=c/(n+s)",
      "after": "nonnegative valid probability indices start at=0;only there0<profile<=1",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "deviation_profile_probability_domain_not_clipping",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "分母正且值≤1要求n+s≥c；保留原索引，不把大於1的值截斷或默默平移。這步只核算術域，無限process／共同空間仍須宣告，有限prefix族不因此取得無限延續前提。",
        "en": "A positive denominator and value≤1 require n+s≥c.Keep the original index;do not clip values above1 or silently shift them.This checks arithmetic domain only.The infinite-process/common-space interpretation remains declared,and the prefix-only family gains no infinite continuation premise."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。",
          "en": "Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    },
    {
      "id": "S002",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S001"
      ],
      "before": "strict profile cross-product numerator := mul(1, 15)",
      "after": "strict profile cross-product numerator = 15",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "依原始角色與已核中間量精確計算；保留分母、嚴格條件、索引及正負號。",
        "en": "Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 strict profile cross-product numerator，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute strict profile cross-product numerator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "mul",
        "inputs": [
          "1",
          "15"
        ],
        "output": "15",
        "label": "strict profile cross-product numerator"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S003",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S002"
      ],
      "before": "strict profile reciprocal threshold := div(15, 1)",
      "after": "strict profile reciprocal threshold = 15",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "依原始角色與已核中間量精確計算；保留分母、嚴格條件、索引及正負號。",
        "en": "Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 strict profile reciprocal threshold，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute strict profile reciprocal threshold with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "div",
        "inputs": [
          "15",
          "1"
        ],
        "output": "15",
        "label": "strict profile reciprocal threshold"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S004",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S003"
      ],
      "before": "strict profile unclamped cutoff := sum(15, -7, 1)",
      "after": "strict profile unclamped cutoff = 9",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "依原始角色與已核中間量精確計算；保留分母、嚴格條件、索引及正負號。",
        "en": "Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 strict profile unclamped cutoff，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute strict profile unclamped cutoff with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "sum",
        "inputs": [
          "15",
          "-7",
          "1"
        ],
        "output": "9",
        "label": "strict profile unclamped cutoff"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S005",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S004"
      ],
      "before": "raw target delta=[1, 15];normalized delta=1/15;positive denominator target numerator=1",
      "after": "floor(c*delta_denominator/delta_numerator)=15;threshold=15;raw least nonnegative strict N=9",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "strict_integer_cutoff_floor_and_nonnegative_boundary",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "c/(N+s)<a/b等價於N+s>cb/a，所以取floor(cb/a)−s+1再與0取最大。嚴格不等式在剛好等號時仍需下一索引。",
        "en": "The strict inequality c/(N+s)<a/b is equivalent to N+s>cb/a,hence floor(cb/a)−s+1 clamped only at0.Equality still requires the next index."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。",
          "en": "Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    },
    {
      "id": "S006",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S005"
      ],
      "before": "strict witness denominator := sum(9, 7)",
      "after": "strict witness denominator = 16",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "依原始角色與已核中間量精確計算；保留分母、嚴格條件、索引及正負號。",
        "en": "Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 strict witness denominator，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute strict witness denominator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "sum",
        "inputs": [
          "9",
          "7"
        ],
        "output": "16",
        "label": "strict witness denominator"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S007",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S006"
      ],
      "before": "strict witness valid probability bound := div(1, 16)",
      "after": "strict witness valid probability bound = 1/16",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "依原始角色與已核中間量精確計算；保留分母、嚴格條件、索引及正負號。",
        "en": "Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 strict witness valid probability bound，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute strict witness valid probability bound with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "div",
        "inputs": [
          "1",
          "16"
        ],
        "output": "1/16",
        "label": "strict witness valid probability bound"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S008",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S007"
      ],
      "before": "previous raw reciprocal denominator := sum(8, 7)",
      "after": "previous raw reciprocal denominator = 15",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "依原始角色與已核中間量精確計算；保留分母、嚴格條件、索引及正負號。",
        "en": "Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 previous raw reciprocal denominator，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute previous raw reciprocal denominator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "sum",
        "inputs": [
          "8",
          "7"
        ],
        "output": "15",
        "label": "previous raw reciprocal denominator"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S009",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S008"
      ],
      "before": "previous raw reciprocal value := div(1, 15)",
      "after": "previous raw reciprocal value = 1/15",
      "relation": "calculation",
      "rule_id": "exact_rational_arithmetic",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "依原始角色與已核中間量精確計算；保留分母、嚴格條件、索引及正負號。",
        "en": "Compute exactly from original roles and established intermediates,retaining denominators,strict guards,indices and signs."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "以精確有理數重算 previous raw reciprocal value，不以小數近似替代。",
          "en": "Recompute previous raw reciprocal value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": {
        "operation": "div",
        "inputs": [
          "1",
          "15"
        ],
        "output": "1/15",
        "label": "previous raw reciprocal value"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "S010",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S009"
      ],
      "before": "N=9;current valid probability=1/16;previous RAW reciprocal=1/15;delta=1/15",
      "after": "current strict bound holds,previous raw threshold fails;N is minimal",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "strict_profile_minimality_without_invalid_probability_claim",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "前一算術分式仍≥delta，所以所有更小索引都不滿足原嚴格門檻。若前索引不在機率域，這裡只稱raw reciprocal，不把大於1的值當機率；本N必已通過原英文有效域guard，不另max平移答案。",
        "en": "The previous arithmetic reciprocal is still≥delta,so every smaller index fails the original strict threshold.If that earlier index is outside the probability domain,it is only a raw reciprocal,not a probability above1.The returned N must pass the original English domain guard;do not max-shift the source answer."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。",
          "en": "Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    },
    {
      "id": "S011",
      "uses": [
        "G001",
        "S010"
      ],
      "before": "declared same-space deviation profile on valid tail;n>=N=9;positive denominators increase",
      "after": "every later profile<=bound=1/16<delta=1/15",
      "relation": "implies",
      "rule_id": "probability_tail_all_later_indices_not_samples",
      "conditions": [],
      "explanation": {
        "zh-Hant": "只在已宣告此偏差profile的情境下，用分母遞增給所有尾項界。這個選定delta見證不從數值另構造共同process，也不把有限資料升格為對未知序列所有epsilon的收斂。",
        "en": "Conditionally on the declared deviation profile,increasing denominators bound every later index.This selected-delta witness neither constructs a common process from numbers nor proves all-epsilon convergence of an unknown sequence from finite data."
      },
      "reverse_audit": {
        "kind": "premise_and_result_audit",
        "explanation": {
          "zh-Hant": "回到原始資料與本步條件核對，不把單向推論誤稱等價。",
          "en": "Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence."
        }
      },
      "arithmetic": null
    }
  ],
  "math_model": {
    "result": [
      1,
      7,
      "1/15",
      9,
      "1/16",
      true,
      "forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound"
    ]
  },
  "conclusion": {
    "canonical_value": "(1, 7, 1/15, 9, 1/16, 是, forall_n_ge_N_tail_bound)",
    "explanation": {
      "zh-Hant": "依上列完整代值及條件核對得到原題答案；原題編號、格式與狀態保持不變。",
      "en": "The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged."
    }
  },
  "definition_note": {
    "zh-Hant": "沿用原題明示的論域、假設與來源 MKO 定義。本題已完成第二對話數理與中英語義覆核，並由原始參數逐題獨立重算模型、答案與每個算術步驟；原題仍為 candidate。",
    "en": "Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate."
  },
  "source": {
    "input_commit": "0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db",
    "question_binding": {
      "batch_id": "batch-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-foundations",
      "batch_path": "public/data/questions/revisions/ocme-parameter-revision-20261017/batch-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-foundations/questions.jsonl",
      "batch_sha256": "d7c47d3e90c56e1c29fd84b1df706b21e2a32f6cb096069ad21f4d2c85515aa8",
      "original_line": 31,
      "original_line_sha256": "623cb7f553c7f952db1206ec6404b2c9d1be57eae41877f292f3b74fc6e2ab34",
      "question_compact_sha256": "8751cd725bead8dedcdb05a6bd09c2e65f4f948c1d5d44d5546b21e073f54b19",
      "english_row_compact_sha256": "6bd2a07b0309e64f8f64b818aad3cb7c041e8d3b65e43d5ab7f1b9de126a724d",
      "english_manifest_path": "public/data/i18n/editions/batch-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-foundations.en.json",
      "english_rows_path": "public/data/i18n/questions/batch-20261014-advance-20261030-r07-convergence-in-probability-foundations.en.jsonl"
    },
    "mko_bindings": {
      "mko-convergence-in-probability": {
        "sha256": "f6a36c4c48518f81f1515a2208543968a39ea38fccfb6c38d7f3613607756354",
        "english_sha256": "662ebc13877df7163257281afba7044949cf6e065b78a7bd62b854e3ad9fbbff",
        "original_path": "public/data/mko/convergence-in-probability.json",
        "english_path": "public/data/i18n/editions/mko-convergence-in-probability.en.json"
      }
    },
    "selected_manifest_sha256": "5233edba9654a6cffd8b6b2d83c932f82ded15f9c0b7c733bd049943e672acff",
    "selected_part_sha256": "54de60dca082018923bf089f2b1eb0a6666cc401916115af792056c8bae935db",
    "original_candidate_sha256": "6285e22dc56bb80c1a326868ce30f43b0e2345b3c9378e21d624462ffdcfa183",
    "original_candidate_line_sha256": "6285e22dc56bb80c1a326868ce30f43b0e2345b3c9378e21d624462ffdcfa183"
  },
  "historical_source_state": {
    "review_state": {
      "derivation": "candidate_authored_and_locally_checked",
      "source_question_state": "candidate",
      "independent_AI_or_human_review": "NOT_PERFORMED",
      "formalization": "not_formalized",
      "Lean": "NOT_RUN"
    },
    "scope_note": {
      "zh-Hant": "來源綁定教學推導候選；精確核對不等於獨立AI／人工審查或一般形式證明。原題、答案、MKO、公式、AST與歷史不變。",
      "en": "Source-bound pedagogical derivation candidate.Exact checking is not independent AI/human review or general formal proof.Original questions,answers,MKOs,formulas,ASTs and history remain unchanged."
    },
    "label": "Frozen producer metadata; current per-question review is separate below."
  },
  "revision": {
    "id": "review-20261026-007-p30",
    "review_date": "2026-10-26",
    "owner_authorized_reader_publication": true,
    "scope": "One hundred sixty family prototypes and their mathematical/bilingual reasoning variants, stems, boundary statements and every distinct explanation shape were reviewed in a context independent of the producer; parameter substitutions, source bindings, full math models, both answer strings and every arithmetic step were independently reconstructed per question from the original parameters only, with negative controls. This grouped method does not claim a separate literal AI reading of every repeated sentence or an extra AI voter.",
    "review_receipts": {
      "semantic_review_sha256": "8c0ef6ca8c5ba2754e41f30c2b32bcb757756152d97421f7396d39038c11f725",
      "question_first_witness_sha256": "c7920a0ff8e724b7e566ebbda30b31d8087c136974b62f8c760fbd26ab816117"
    },
    "status": "second_context_reviewed",
    "mathematical_semantics": true,
    "bilingual_semantics": true,
    "steps_reviewed": 11,
    "method": "family_template_semantic_review_plus_independent_per_instance_reconstruction",
    "exact_question_first_check": {
      "model_sha256": "f192cff3b41ea0d9a170375e41b862d9a107e16bba9f655ae82409468af4ef4c",
      "arithmetic_steps": 7
    },
    "uses_answer_as_premise": false,
    "human_review": "NOT_PERFORMED",
    "formalization": "not_formalized",
    "Lean": "NOT_RUN",
    "Canonical_truth_promotion": false,
    "authority": "Owner-authorized reviewed reader publication; original question/candidate states remain historical and unchanged."
  }
}
