← Return to results

Bias-variance decomposition

On this page
  1. Mathematical statement
  2. Representative formula (exact TeX)
  3. Assumptions
  4. Symbol scope
  5. Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
  6. Adopted derivation guide
  7. Prerequisites
  8. Verification boundary
  9. Next obligation
  10. Same-source structured data

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

For each parameter value and its sampling law, scalar-estimator MSE equals variance plus squared bias.

mko-bias-variance-decomposition · theorem · v0.10.0

Mathematical statement

For every theta supply a complete normalized finite sampling law. Under that same law separately compute the mean, bias=E_theta[T]−theta, variance=E_theta[(T−E_theta[T])^2] and MSE=E_theta[(T−theta)^2]. Expanding T−theta=(T−E_theta[T])+bias gives a cross term that vanishes because E_theta[T−E_theta[T]]=0. Thus MSE=variance+bias^2 pointwise in theta. Do not pool different theta laws. Unbiasedness gives MSE=variance, not zero MSE or consistency. One observed squared error is not the definition of expected loss, even if its numerical value coincides with MSE.

Representative formula (exact TeX)

M(T,t)=V(T,t)+B(T,t)^2

Assumptions

  • Theta, listed estimator values and probabilities are exact rationals in a complete normalized law.
  • This slice uses scalar estimators with finite sampling laws.

Symbol scope

  • M — mean squared error
  • T — scalar estimator
  • t — target parameter
  • V — estimator variance
  • B — estimator bias

Intuition, definition, and misconceptions

Compute all four quantities under the same complete law.

Cross-term cancellation requires the explicit centering identity.

The biased/unbiased boundary is not a zero-error claim.

A single realized squared error is not MSE, and an unbiased estimator can still have positive variance.

Adopted derivation guide

Bias-variance derivation with the cross term visible

The original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.

Prerequisites

Verification boundary

Check each theta separately. Finite tables do not establish consistency or asymptotic optimality.

not_formalized

This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.

Next obligation

Add finite-model risks and estimator comparisons.

Same-source structured data

This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.

Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown