Polynomial factorization over the rationals

On this page
  1. Mathematical statement
  2. Representative formula (exact TeX)
  3. Assumptions
  4. Symbol scope
  5. Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
  6. Adopted derivation guide
  7. Prerequisites
  8. Verification boundary
  9. Next obligation
  10. Same-source structured data

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

Factorization writes a polynomial as a product in a declared coefficient field. Validation compares all coefficients rather than a few evaluated values.

mko-factorization · definition · v0.10.0

Mathematical statement

In Q[x], a proposed factorization p=f·g is a polynomial identity: after expansion and collection of like powers, every coefficient agrees. This entry illustrates binomial products, common factors, and differences of squares; it does not provide a complete factorization algorithm for all polynomials.

Representative formula (exact TeX)

x^{2}-a^{2}

Assumptions

  • Fix one formal indeterminate x and rational coefficients represented by finite coefficient data.
  • Remove trailing zeros from factors and products. Multiplying factors by compensating constants or reordering them does not count as new mathematical content in this pulse.

Symbol scope

  • x — formal indeterminate
  • a — rational constant in the representative difference of squares

Intuition, definition, and misconceptions

(x+a)(x+b)=x²+(a+b)x+ab. Multiplication term by term and collection of like powers give a reproducible coefficient identity. For a∈Q, extracting a common factor, such as ax+a=a(x+1), remains in the same univariate polynomial ring.

The difference of squares x²−d²=(x−d)(x+d) is an identity. The exercises verify its coefficient expansion for integer d; agreement at one or two inputs does not establish equality of the entire polynomials.

Factorability depends on the coefficient field. For example, x²−2 cannot be expressed as a product of two nonconstant linear factors over Q, but over R the factors may use ±√2. Factorization is distinct from solving an equation, and a zero-product argument also requires a specified number system.

Common errors include applying a difference-of-squares formula to a sum of squares, or treating agreement at finitely many inputs as an identity without a justified degree bound.

Adopted derivation guide

Polynomial factorization over the rationals: verifying common factors, binomial products and differences of squares by comparing coefficients

The original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.

Prerequisites

Verification boundary

This pulse validates identities of explicit finite coefficient products only; general irreducibility, unique factorization, and a complete algorithm have no attached formal proof.

not_formalized

This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.

Next obligation

Bind Polynomial Q multiplication, coeff_mul, the specified identities, and the conditions for changing coefficient fields.

Same-source structured data

This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.

Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown