Natural-number congruence modulo a positive modulus
On this page
This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.
For a fixed positive modulus n, two natural numbers a and b are congruent modulo n when they have the same remainder on division by n.
mko-modular-congruence · definition · v0.10.0
Mathematical statement
For natural numbers a,b and a positive natural n, a≡b (mod n) exactly when a mod n=b mod n. Equivalently, there are natural k,l with a+n·k=b+n·l.
Representative formula (exact TeX)
r(a)=r(b)
Assumptions
- The inputs a and b are natural numbers and the modulus n is a positive natural number.
- This entry deliberately excludes n=0 so that programming-language mod-zero conventions are not mixed with ordinary elementary-number-theory semantics.
Symbol scope
r— remainder function for a fixed positive modulusa— first natural-number inputb— second natural-number input
Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
Congruence compares remainders under the same fixed modulus, not numerical equality. It is an equivalence relation on the natural numbers.
If a≡b (mod n) and c≡d (mod n), addition and multiplication preserve congruence. Finite exercises recompute the remainders explicitly.
Cancelling a multiplicative factor requires extra conditions. One cannot generally cancel c from c·a≡c·b without considering the gcd of c and n.
Do not mix moduli, admit a zero modulus in this entry, or cancel common factors unconditionally.
Adopted derivation guide
Congruence modulo a positive modulus: the remainder definition, the witness form, preservation by operations and the limits of cancellationThe original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.
Prerequisites
- Natural number — Inputs, modulus and remainders belong to the natural numbers.
- Arithmetic operations — Congruence calculations use exact division remainders, addition and multiplication.
Verification boundary
Finite remainders for a fixed positive modulus can be checked exactly; this slice does not claim a formal Chinese remainder theorem or general cancellation law.
not_formalized
This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.
Next obligation
Bind the remainder definition of Nat.ModEq, its equivalence relation and add/mul preservation; separately prove the symmetric natural-witness bridge.
Same-source structured data
This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.
Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown