← Return to results

Natural number

On this page
  1. Mathematical statement
  2. Representative formula (exact TeX)
  3. Assumptions
  4. Symbol scope
  5. Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
  6. Adopted derivation guide
  7. Prerequisites
  8. Verification boundary
  9. Next obligation
  10. Same-source structured data

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

Natural numbers are basic numbers for counting and discrete order; this entry adopts the convention that they include 0.

mko-natural-number · concept · v0.10.0

Mathematical statement

Under this entry’s convention, the natural-number set N contains 0 and the numbers 1, 2, 3, and so on obtained by finitely many successor steps from 0.

Representative formula (exact TeX)

n\in N

Assumptions

  • The symbol N in this entry is explicitly defined to include 0.
  • n denotes an arbitrary number whose membership in N is under consideration.

Symbol scope

  • n — candidate natural number
  • N — set of natural numbers
  • ∈ — membership relation

Intuition, definition, and misconceptions

Natural numbers provide the basic language of counting and discrete order. The number 0 represents the quantity of no objects; taking the successor of any natural number produces the next natural number.

Mathematical traditions differ on whether 0 belongs to the natural numbers. For consistency with Lean Nat and later OCME objects, this entry fixes N to include 0. External sources should still be checked for their convention.

A natural number is distinct from a numeral used to write it. For example, decimal 2 and binary 10 can denote the same natural number.

A common mistake is to assume every text uses the same convention about 0, or to confuse a number with the notation used to write it.

Adopted derivation guide

Natural number: deciding membership through the smallest inductive set, and telling numbers from numerals

The original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.

Prerequisites

    Verification boundary

    This entry is a conceptual candidate. Its research sources are not OCME Evidence, and no computational check or Lean formal proof has yet been registered.

    not_formalized

    This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.

    Next obligation

    Build an explicit semantic bridge from OCME N, zero, and successor to Lean Nat, then generate content-addressed Evidence after validation.

    Same-source structured data

    This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.

    Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown