Sequence limits and exact tail cutoffs
On this page
This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.
A zero-based real sequence converges when every precision admits a natural cutoff controlling the entire tail; this pulse treats an exact reciprocal-tail model.
mko-sequence-limit · definition · v0.10.0
Mathematical statement
A real sequence u:N0→R tends to L when, for every ε>0, there is a natural N≥0 such that |u(n)−L|<ε for all n≥N. Here u(n)=L+c/(n+d), with d≥1 and real L,c. Its integer-parameter error is |c|/(n+d); convergence is not guessed from finitely many samples.
Representative formula (exact TeX)
u(n)
Assumptions
- N0 includes zero, and n+d>0 for every term. Exercises use safe-integer L,c,d, positive rational ε=p/q, and nonnegative safe-integer n and candidate N.
- All tail errors in this fixed model are nonincreasing, so a uniform cutoff N is valid exactly when |c|q<p(N+d). Equality fails the strict error condition.
- The least permitted cutoff is max(0,floor(|c|q/p)−d+1). At c=0, N=0 suffices; L does not affect error or cutoff.
Symbol scope
u— specified real sequencen— natural index starting at zero
Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
The cutoff may depend on ε, but once chosen must control the entire tail. Checking one term or finitely many initial terms cannot prove convergence of an arbitrary sequence. This reciprocal model has a monotone error bound permitting the exact inequality.
Strict error changes the least cutoff: c=1, d=1, ε=1/2 makes the error at N=1 equal to ε, so the least valid cutoff is two. Positive and negative c have the same absolute error.
These checks concern the declared model and its exact parameter eligibility, not a new general convergence proof or formal bridge. Changing L does not give a new error calculation, and changing c,d does not give a new limit-value calculation.
Common errors include choosing one cutoff independent of every ε, checking only finitely many terms, or accepting error equal to ε.
Adopted derivation guide
Sequence limits: the exact tail cutoff and an ε-N proof for the reciprocal modelThe original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.
Prerequisites
- Sequence — First fix the sequence and index convention.
- Tends-to relation — Tending to a value does not require attaining it.
- Quantifiers and explicit domains — Retain the order ∀ε, ∃N, ∀n≥N.
- Rational number — Represent positive tolerance and error exactly.
Verification boundary
The fixed-model parameters and tail bounds can be recomputed exactly; general real-sequence convergence has no newly attached formal Evidence.
not_formalized
This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.
Next obligation
Bind pinned Tendsto atTop, real neighborhoods, natural indexing, and the all-tail obligation for reciprocal cutoffs.
Same-source structured data
This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.
Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown