Subset construction from an NFA to a DFA

On this page
  1. Mathematical statement
  2. Representative formula (exact TeX)
  3. Assumptions
  4. Symbol scope
  5. Intuition, definition, and misconceptions
  6. Adopted derivation guide
  7. Prerequisites
  8. Verification boundary
  9. Next obligation
  10. Same-source structured data

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

Use epsilon-NFA state subsets as DFA states, defining start, transitions and acceptance with epsilon closure to preserve the language.

mko-subset-construction-nfa-to-dfa · theorem · v0.10.0

Mathematical statement

The DFA start is epsilon-closure({q0}). For subset S and symbol a, delta_D(S,a)=epsilon-closure(move(S,a)). A subset accepts exactly when its intersection with the NFA final set is nonempty. Empty subset is a legal dead state. Restriction to reachable subsets is allowed only when explicit. For every word prefix, the DFA subset equals all epsilon-closed NFA states reachable after that prefix; finite-word testing alone does not prove language equivalence.

Representative formula (exact TeX)

D(S,a)=E(M(S,a))

Assumptions

  • The source epsilon-NFA has complete finite states, alphabet and transition relation; null denotes epsilon without input consumption.
  • Subsets are canonically sorted, each symbol move is followed by epsilon closure, and traces begin at the epsilon-closed start.

Symbol scope

  • D — DFA subset transition
  • S — NFA state subset
  • a — input symbol
  • E — epsilon closure
  • M — symbol move

Intuition, definition, and misconceptions

Close epsilon reachability for the start subset first.

Each symbol transition uses move followed by closure.

The arbitrary-prefix invariant, not finitely many accept/reject samples, supports general language equivalence.

Do not omit epsilon closure, delete the empty subset without handling dead transitions or claim language equivalence from finitely many test words.

Adopted derivation guide

The complete reachable-subset DFA of an epsilon-NFA

The original MKO is retained. The guide has its own append-only revision and verification boundaries, not a new Lean proof.

Prerequisites

Verification boundary

Exact traces check each supplied word; general equivalence rests on prefix induction, not a sample count.

not_formalized

This does not mean the content is false; it means no replayable computational or formal evidence is registered yet.

Next obligation

Add regular-expression equivalence and automata minimization.

Same-source structured data

This page and the interactive view use the same object and existing language edition; this adds no proof or human review.

Canonical MKO JSON · Plain Markdown