Full-Vertex Connectivity, Acyclicity, Edge Counts and Unweighted Boundaries

This batch has passed Schema, deduplication, source-snapshot, and independent-answer recomputation checks; it is still not marked as human-reviewed.

This question bank has corresponding bilingual step-by-step derivations. Source candidate and English ai_candidate states are retained. AI review, finite computation and Lean formal proof are labelled separately.

batch-20261014-advance-20261104-r06-spanning-tree-foundations · 2026-10-14 · 100 questions

This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.

Field order uses a source-bound presentation supplement; canonical JSONL and mathematical answers are unchanged.

Field-order and source-binding data

1. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

2. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

3. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

4. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

5. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

6. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

7. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

8. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

9. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

10. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

11. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

12. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

13. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

14. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

15. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

16. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

17. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

18. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

19. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

20. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

21. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

22. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

23. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

24. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

25. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).

View answer and explanation

([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)

Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate

26. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

27. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

28. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

29. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

30. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

31. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

32. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

33. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

34. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

35. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

36. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

37. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

38. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

39. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

40. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

41. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

42. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

43. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

44. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

45. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

46. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

47. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

48. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

49. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

50. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).

View answer and explanation

(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)

Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate

51. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(1)={0,…,0}, canonical sorted edges=[], and distinct parent-edge selection=[], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(1, [], Yes, Yes)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, [], Yes, Yes).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

52. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

53. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

54. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

55. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

56. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

57. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

58. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

59. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

60. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

61. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

62. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

63. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

64. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

65. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

66. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

67. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

68. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

69. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

70. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

71. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

72. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

73. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

74. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

75. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).

View answer and explanation

(5, [0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, No)

The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, No).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate

76. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

77. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

78. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

79. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

80. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

81. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

82. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

83. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

84. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

85. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

86. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

87. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

88. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

89. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

90. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

91. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

92. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

93. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

94. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

95. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

96. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

97. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

98. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

99. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

100. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim

Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).

The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.

View answer and explanation

(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)

Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).

Reviewed step-by-step derivation

Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate

Canonical question JSONL · English JSONL · Validation report