Full-Vertex Connectivity, Acyclicity, Edge Counts and Unweighted Boundaries
This batch has passed Schema, deduplication, source-snapshot, and independent-answer recomputation checks; it is still not marked as human-reviewed.
This question bank has corresponding bilingual step-by-step derivations. Source candidate and English ai_candidate states are retained. AI review, finite computation and Lean formal proof are labelled separately.
batch-20261014-advance-20261104-r06-spanning-tree-foundations · 2026-10-14 · 100 questions
This English edition is an AI candidate and does not yet have an OCME Atlas (GPT-6) Twin closure receipt.
Field order uses a source-bound presentation supplement; canonical JSONL and mathematical answers are unchanged.
Field-order and source-binding data
1. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
2. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
3. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
4. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
5. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
6. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
7. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
8. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
9. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
10. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
11. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
12. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
13. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
14. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
15. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
16. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
17. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
18. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
19. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
20. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
21. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
22. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
23. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
24. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
25. A Spanning Tree Uses the Entire Parent Vertex Set
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (selected_indices, parent_connected, selected_connected, selected_acyclic, spanning_tree).
View answer and explanation
([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes)
Read the selected parent edges and report all connectivity and acyclicity obligations separately. A disconnected candidate parent has no spanning tree; a failed selection does not refute existence for another selection in a connected parent. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is ([0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-audit · candidate
26. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
27. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
28. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
29. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
30. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
31. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
32. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
33. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
34. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
35. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
36. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
37. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
38. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
39. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
40. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
41. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
42. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
43. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
44. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
45. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
46. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
47. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
48. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
49. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
50. Counting n−1 Edges Alone Does Not Establish a Tree
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_edge_count, connected, acyclic, edge_count_is_n_minus_one, spanning_tree, boundary).
View answer and explanation
(5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient)
Compare the selected edge count with n−1 and retain both connectivity and acyclicity checks. A cycle on some vertices with an isolated vertex can have n−1 edges and still fail to span as a tree. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, 4, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, n_minus_one_alone_insufficient).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-n-minus-one-certificate · candidate
51. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(1)={0,…,0}, canonical sorted edges=[], and distinct parent-edge selection=[], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(1, [], Yes, Yes)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (1, [], Yes, Yes).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
52. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 2, 3], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
53. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
54. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 4], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
55. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 4, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
56. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
57. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
58. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
59. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
60. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 3, 4], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
61. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
62. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
63. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 5, 6], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
64. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 4, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
65. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
66. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 5, 6], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
67. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 6, 7], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
68. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 2, 4], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
69. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
70. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 3, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
71. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 4, 6], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
72. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 1, 3, 5], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
73. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
74. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 2, 4, 6], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
75. Recognize the Single-Vertex Empty-Edge Tree without Assuming It
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (vertex_count, selected_indices, spanning_tree, one_vertex_empty_selection).
View answer and explanation
(5, [0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, No)
The final flag checks whether the actual carrier has one vertex and the selection is empty. That case is a valid spanning tree. For a larger carrier the flag is No even when a nonempty selection forms a spanning tree; it is not a mislabeled single-vertex theorem. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (5, [0, 3, 5, 7], Yes, No).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-one-vertex · candidate
76. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 3], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
77. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
78. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
79. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
80. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
81. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
82. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
83. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
84. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
85. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
86. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
87. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
88. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 4, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
89. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
90. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 5, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
91. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [1, 4], [2, 3], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 6, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
92. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 2, 4], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
93. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
94. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
95. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
96. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
97. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
98. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 2, 4, 6], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
99. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 3, 5, 7], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
100. An Unweighted Tree Audit Withholds a Weighted-Minimum Claim
Use the complete finite undirected loop-free simple parent graph on Fin(5)={0,…,4}, canonical sorted edges=[[0, 1], [1, 2], [1, 4], [2, 3], [2, 4], [3, 4]], and distinct parent-edge selection=[0, 1, 3, 5], sorted increasingly. The selected subgraph retains every parent vertex, including isolated vertices. Audit parent connectivity, selected connectivity and acyclicity separately. A spanning tree is connected and acyclic on that full carrier; n−1 selected edges alone do not suffice. No edge weights or minimum-weight objective are supplied. Give (spanning_tree, weighted_minimum_claim, boundary).
The second No withholds a weighted-minimum claim; it does not disprove optimality under some separately supplied weights.
View answer and explanation
(Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim)
Report actual spanning-tree validity, then No for the absent weighted-minimum claim. This is not a statement that the tree cannot be minimum under some separately supplied weights. No weighted optimization problem was specified. The exact result, retaining the requested order, is (Yes, No, unweighted_spanning_tree_not_minimum_spanning_tree_claim).
Reviewed step-by-step derivation
Spanning tree · qf-mod35-spantree-non-mst-boundary · candidate
Canonical question JSONL · English JSONL · Validation report