A nondegenerate triangle has interior angles 65°, 80°, 35°. Is it a right triangle?
G001 — A nondegenerate triangle has interior angles 65°, 80°, 35°. Is it a right triangle?
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Use THIS bank’s actual fields,operation/domain and types.BASE retains permissible extra metadata.Do not import LDL SAFE/set limits or a different bank’s deduplication rules.
Right triangle ORIGINAL three interior angles sum := sum(65, 80, 35)
After
Right triangle ORIGINAL three interior angles sum = 180
Conditions: none
This step displays the exact original operands and operation.Mul/sub/div have EXACTLY TWO inputs.Keep rational values exact and derived BigInts unbounded;do not force an answer by approximation.
ALL30 actual questions have THREE positive interior angles summing to180,matching the bilingual nondegenerate-triangle premise.A right triangle is defined by ONE angle of90.First qualify the triangle;90 in invalid angle data is not enough.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS question’s original operands,roles and necessary premises;reconstruct the next step,without reversing a one-way implication.Numerical/finite-table checking is not formal proof of an arbitrary theorem.Original Q,bilingual sources,MKO,AST,status and history remain preserved.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Right triangle ORIGINAL three interior angles sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS question’s original operands,roles and necessary premises;reconstruct the next step,without reversing a one-way implication.Numerical/finite-table checking is not formal proof of an arbitrary theorem.Original Q,bilingual sources,MKO,AST,status and history remain preserved.
Result
No
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.