Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 33033: Truth of a Conjunction

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 166

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0065-33033 · q-20260916-logic-conjunction-truth-0008

Original question and givens

The truth values of P and Q are false and false respectively. Is P ∧ Q true?

  • G001 — The truth values of P and Q are false and false respectively. Is P ∧ Q true?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-logic-conjunction-truth, BASE-no-required-operation, BASE-no-required-domain, []]

After

derived = [[SOURCE_YesNo_STRING]]

Conditions: none

MOD25 uses LOCAL hyphens/named domains,legacy matrices underscores/reals;BASE logic acquires no domain/op.Output tuples,matrices,numeric fields and fraction texts follow THIS source,not a universal/1 rule.Retain originals/English/AST/status.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R65_SOURCE_bank_keys_operation_domain_ordered_output_roles · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [No, No, ∧, "P8 \u8207 Q8"]

After

derived = [[[No, No, No], [No, Yes, No], [Yes, No, No], [Yes, Yes, Yes]]]

Conditions: none

P/Q are GIVEN EXACT Booleans;do not infer truth from context.Show all four defining cases.OR is INCLUSIVE;material implication fails ONLY at P true/Q false and is not causation;check BOTH directions for iff.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Logic_EXACT_Boolean_givens_FULL_connective_truth_definition · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

source roles = [No, No, ∧]

After

derived = [Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, No]

Conditions: none

Substitute THIS P/Q to evaluate the connective;iff needs both directions true.A false-premise implication may be true without establishing causation or proving the underlying propositions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Logic_INSTANCE_forward_backward_and_result_not_underlying_proof · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check ORIGINAL data,types,ordered roles,domain and premises;the conclusion need not uniquely recover its premises.Keep finite source candidates,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check ORIGINAL data,types,ordered roles,domain and premises;the conclusion need not uniquely recover its premises.Keep finite source candidates,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check ORIGINAL data,types,ordered roles,domain and premises;the conclusion need not uniquely recover its premises.Keep finite source candidates,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.

Result

No

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 2e11085d274ed09f01d3804550044c4c66900712c33caede3f0bd951f7c6f1f0
  • candidate record SHA-256: 75cb1abc447696079da1f270e33e8c3acc901da9789d8bc53465176da7d9298a
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 92bb5fa69818f30cd2806d74a26bd5ede6c48c80d2ecc3d31a5130d4ad7666b6
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 012b5aa905280d616be49aa9462daaa73bf7f6247d0a796e78bc5bcd24e6bd00
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON