Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 31907: Cardinality of a Finite Event

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 160

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0062-31907 · q-20260918-finite-event-cardinality-0007

Original question and givens

Let S={25, 26, 27}, F=P(S), and E={26}. What is the cardinality of E?

  • G001 — Let S={25, 26, 27}, F=P(S), and E={26}. What is the cardinality of E?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-finite-event-cardinality, no-domain-field, no-operation-field, no-form-field]

After

derived = [[cardinality_NUMBER_not_probability]]

Conditions: none

Check THIS bank interface:BASE equations use form/domain;BASE events/complement have no operation;factorials have no domain.ext18 uses local hyphens,other legacy operations underscores.Do not force every answer into a tuple or fraction.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R62_EXACT_source_keys_domain_operation_form_AND_output_types · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [S original sample, [25, 26, 27]]

After

derived = [[25, 26, 27]]

Conditions: none

The BASE finite set is a DISTINCT integer list;do not silently repair duplicates.Sort numerically ONLY for derived display,retaining original data.Do not import the expectation100-element or SAFE bounds.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: BASE_FINITE_set_distinct_INTEGER_list_no_silent_duplicate_fix · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

source roles = [E original event candidate, [26]]

After

derived = [[26]]

Conditions: none

The BASE finite set is a DISTINCT integer list;do not silently repair duplicates.Sort numerically ONLY for derived display,retaining original data.Do not import the expectation100-element or SAFE bounds.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: BASE_FINITE_set_distinct_INTEGER_list_no_silent_duplicate_fix · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [0, 26, [25, 26, 27]]

After

derived = [Yes]

Conditions: none

Check EACH candidate event element in ORIGINAL S.The empty event satisfies the subset condition vacuously.F=P(S)is not a probability law and does not imply equal likelihood.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Event_EACH_candidate_element_membership_in_ORIGINAL_S · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

source roles = [[25, 26, 27], [26], P(S)]

After

derived = [[Yes], [], Yes]

Conditions: none

With EXACT F=P(S),event qualification is precisely E⊆S.An outside E is a LEGAL No in subset-validity;do not delete the witness first.Cardinality,occurrence and probability are distinct questions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Event_FULLpowerset_qualification_ALL_subset_flags_NOT_probability · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

Event cardinality ORIGINAL distinct element slot0 := sum(0, 1)

After

Event cardinality ORIGINAL distinct element slot0 = 1

Conditions: none

Use ORIGINAL operands and declared order for exact integer/rational arithmetic,not floats.Bounds are family-specific:do not revalidate derived values as RAW inputs or add blanket SAFE/n64 caps to BASE families.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

source roles = [[25, 26, 27], [26]]

After

derived = [1]

Conditions: none

Count EACH distinct element for|E|.The answer is a NUMBER,not a fraction or probability.The empty event has cardinality0,even when S is empty.No uniform distribution is assumed.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Event_CARDINALITY_NUMBER_distinct_count_NO_probability_or_nonempty_S · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Event cardinality ORIGINAL distinct element slot0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.

Result

1

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 6717681ec5607f400a4ec88b44b3ad44446c8139ffaaac78804979c73b2ba929
  • candidate record SHA-256: fe14bd6a5edc4a3e48fc98eb9c78e5831a8260c1bdfd92317b09cd019013bde8
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 963099ffc9f754069fdce6792949a85ed350472465eaceb3038fa8011cf672bd
  • question-first witness SHA-256: d7655324c5d11528e1af90b757384cebd3313e19dc5f6f5b9b8ea7624fb06f6f
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON