Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 1223: Classifying an Explicit Angle Measure

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 7

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0001-01223 · q-20260922-angle-degree-classification-0023

Original question and givens

Angle θ has the explicitly stated integer measure 2°. Without inferring from a drawing, is θ acute, right, obtuse, or straight?

  • G001 — Angle θ has the explicitly stated integer measure 2°. Without inferring from a drawing, is θ acute, right, obtuse, or straight?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

angle measurements are explicit integers in degrees

After

classification uses values, not diagram appearance

Conditions: none

Retain degree units and the declared range rather than estimating from a diagram.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: degree_measure_domain · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

θ=2°

After

acute:0<θ<90; right:θ=90; obtuse:90<θ<180; straight:θ=180

Conditions: none

The four disjoint cases cover the full declared angle range.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exhaustive_angle_intervals · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

θ−90 := sub(2, 90)

After

θ−90 = -88

Conditions: none

Check position relative to90, then the180-degree endpoint.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

θ=2°; θ−90=-88

After

category=acute angle

Conditions: none

Use strict boundaries and equality to select one case; do not place90 or180 in the wrong open interval.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: angle_case_selection · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute θ−90 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

acute angle

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 66f31e152b019d8ab467bd63a562d4778f8953cd1698e5dfab4292767a9750f7
  • candidate record SHA-256: c417f8c202de25d93ce40b90bd19c624f15e3503ac82ffd31609f7094014ea6a
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: c3b44ce8ed60ada6902fb206627537d5f90ba2a867eaba43a36f903280c496cc
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 3e91602adc7f81a2671a2a3ffaf6a447028b56abc5853e8271673d76f30cd7ad
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON