Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 1300: Relation Between Two Explicit Angle Measures

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 7

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0001-01300 · q-20260922-angle-pair-relation-0025

Original question and givens

Angles α=33° and β=44° have explicitly stated integer measures. Using only α+β, are they complementary, supplementary, or neither?

  • G001 — Angles α=33° and β=44° have explicitly stated integer measures. Using only α+β, are they complementary, supplementary, or neither?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

angle measurements are explicit integers in degrees

After

classification uses values, not diagram appearance

Conditions: none

Retain degree units and the declared range rather than estimating from a diagram.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: degree_measure_domain · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

α+β := sum(33, 44)

After

α+β = 77

Conditions: none

Add the two explicit degree measures; order does not affect the sum.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

sum=77°

After

complementary iff sum90°; supplementary iff sum180°

Conditions: none

The relation depends on their sum; adjacency is not required.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: angle_pair_definitions · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

α+β=77°

After

relation=neither

Conditions: none

If the sum is neither90 nor180, neither relation holds.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: angle_pair_verdict · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute α+β with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

neither

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: a2dfddab5136d597c8ca363d9e456d6953c2a029c7746a23d386d110d1526911
  • candidate record SHA-256: 767f67372af6bf1af91d0a035ba9ceb3e2bd7bff3a4ff53ccb46d70565eaffe7
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: c3b44ce8ed60ada6902fb206627537d5f90ba2a867eaba43a36f903280c496cc
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 3e91602adc7f81a2671a2a3ffaf6a447028b56abc5853e8271673d76f30cd7ad
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON