Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 31877: Successor Recurrence for Factorial

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 160

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0062-31877 · q-20260926-factorial-successor-recurrence-0002

Original question and givens

Given 1!=1, use (n+1)!=(n+1)×n! to find 2!.

  • G001 — Given 1!=1, use (n+1)!=(n+1)×n! to find 2!.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-factorial-successor-recurrence, no-domain-field, successor_recurrence, no-form-field]

After

derived = [[exact_integer_STRING]]

Conditions: none

Check THIS bank interface:BASE equations use form/domain;BASE events/complement have no operation;factorials have no domain.ext18 uses local hyphens,other legacy operations underscores.Do not force every answer into a tuple or fraction.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R62_EXACT_source_keys_domain_operation_form_AND_output_types · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [Factorial requested n, 1]

After

derived = [1]

Conditions: none

Factorial multiplies the COMPLETE2..n factors;at n0/1 the empty product is1.Use arbitrary-precision integers,not Number/scientific notation or another family n64 cap.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Factorial_COMPLETE_product_EMPTY0and1_are1_not_input_n64_cap · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

source roles = [1, 1]

After

derived = [1]

Conditions: none

Recompute the WHOLE n! and compare the GIVEN decimal STRING first;do not treat an unchecked hint as an answer oracle.Require the exact string,retaining every digit.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Factorial_GIVEN_nfactorial_STRING_verified_not_assumed · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

Factorial ORIGINAL successor index n plus1 := sum(1, 1)

After

Factorial ORIGINAL successor index n plus1 = 2

Conditions: none

Use ORIGINAL operands and declared order for exact integer/rational arithmetic,not floats.Bounds are family-specific:do not revalidate derived values as RAW inputs or add blanket SAFE/n64 caps to BASE families.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

Factorial ORIGINAL successor factor times verified n factorial := mul(2, 1)

After

Factorial ORIGINAL successor factor times verified n factorial = 2

Conditions: none

Use ORIGINAL operands and declared order for exact integer/rational arithmetic,not floats.Bounds are family-specific:do not revalidate derived values as RAW inputs or add blanket SAFE/n64 caps to BASE families.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

source roles = [1, 1, 2]

After

derived = [2]

Conditions: none

AFTER verifying n!,apply(n+1)!=(n+1)n! by one exact multiplication.At n0 this gives1!=1,not0;do not exchange n!and(n+1)!.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Factorial_SUCCESSOR_recurrence_uses_verified_nfactorial · Uses: G001, S005

Reverse checks

  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Factorial ORIGINAL successor factor times verified n factorial with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Factorial ORIGINAL successor index n plus1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check the ORIGINAL inputs,field roles,domain and premises.Consistency does not imply unique recovery of premises.Keep finite checking,independent review,formal proof and publication separate.

Result

2

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: b792dfb6b272c37aabd23aeeb262f06b1dc31e383a84c54b278b2b8111696c45
  • candidate record SHA-256: 203eac94400fc4b96db0d2c4aa01656b7fcd690ca861b6540e3f95bb77071771
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 963099ffc9f754069fdce6792949a85ed350472465eaceb3038fa8011cf672bd
  • question-first witness SHA-256: d7655324c5d11528e1af90b757384cebd3313e19dc5f6f5b9b8ea7624fb06f6f
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON