Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 1076: Solution Classification of an Absolute-Value Equation

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 6

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0001-01076 · q-20260928-absolute-value-equation-class-0001

Original question and givens

Over the real numbers, classify the solution set of |x|=-4.

  • G001 — Over the real numbers, classify the solution set of |x|=-4.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

x∈R

After

|x|=x if x≥0; |x|=−x if x<0

Conditions: none

The sign branches cover every real number, with0 in the nonnegative branch.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: absolute_definition · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

|x|=-4

After

|x|≥0 for every real x

Conditions: none

From the piecewise definition, x or −x is nonnegative on its respective branch.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: absolute_nonnegativity · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

c=-4<0

After

nonnegative left side cannot equal this right side

Conditions: none

A nonnegative number cannot equal a negative one, so no real solution exists; sampling guesses is unnecessary.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: negative_rhs_obstruction · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

contradiction for every x∈R

After

no solution

Conditions: none

By the definition of solution set, this contradiction gives the empty set.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: empty_solution_set · Uses: G001, S003

Reverse checks

  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Use ≥0 rather than >0 so that0 is not omitted.

Result

no solution

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 9332e3b39d3aef528befff161ad0e31cab8374a04c9a07853be3f398251b9be2
  • candidate record SHA-256: db326ef2c56f81a95e07f84d048e046bf77f34915805808de49985d518f43a4f
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: c3b44ce8ed60ada6902fb206627537d5f90ba2a867eaba43a36f903280c496cc
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 3e91602adc7f81a2671a2a3ffaf6a447028b56abc5853e8271673d76f30cd7ad
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON