S001 · implies
Before
x∈R
After
|x|=x if x≥0; |x|=−x if x<0
Conditions: none
The sign branches cover every real number, with0 in the nonnegative branch.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: absolute_definition · Uses: G001
Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0001-01043 · q-20260928-absolute-value-piecewise-branch-0018
For the real number x=-5, which branch of the piecewise definition of |x| applies?
G001 — For the real number x=-5, which branch of the piecewise definition of |x| applies?Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
x∈R
After
|x|=x if x≥0; |x|=−x if x<0
Conditions: none
The sign branches cover every real number, with0 in the nonnegative branch.
Rule: absolute_definition · Uses: G001
Before
x=-5
After
x≥0: No
Conditions: none
Determine the sign of the given value rather than guessing from a picture.
Rule: sign_test · Uses: G001, S001
Before
x=-5
After
negative branch -x
Conditions: none
Zero satisfies the nonnegative condition; only negative values use −x.
Rule: select_absolute_branch · Uses: G001, S002
Before
absolute value := mul(-1, -5)
After
absolute value = 5
Conditions: none
Multiply by1 or −1 according to the selected branch to obtain a nonnegative value.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003
Before
|x|=5
After
result≥0: Yes
Conditions: none
Verify nonnegativity to avoid a negative result from the negative branch.
Rule: absolute_result_guard · Uses: G001, S004
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute absolute value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Use ≥0 rather than >0 so that0 is not omitted.negative branch -x
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 2baaeb02ad1a99a89a79ce36e0926474f84620440173c3f4ca5189398df3a660candidate record SHA-256: 1935c0a5363afb1b35d6c3ba79d66d7b23c33862d149ec63d90eaef093d44c99semantic review receipt SHA-256: c3b44ce8ed60ada6902fb206627537d5f90ba2a867eaba43a36f903280c496ccquestion-first witness SHA-256: 3e91602adc7f81a2671a2a3ffaf6a447028b56abc5853e8271673d76f30cd7adLean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED