Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 34433: Missing Term in a Proportion

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 173

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0067-34433 · q-20260930-r02-proportion-missing-term-0008

Original question and givens

Solve the rational proportion -5/(-1)=x/(4). Both denominators are nonzero; give x as a reduced p/q with a positive denominator.

  • G001 — Solve the rational proportion -5/(-1)=x/(4). Both denominators are nonzero; give x as a reduced p/q with a positive denominator.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-proportion-missing-term, [a, b, d, operation]]

After

derived = [missing_term, no-invented-domain]

Conditions: none

Check THIS bank’s keys/operation/domain:legacy table underscores,MOD50 local hyphens;permissive BASE data acquires no unknown-field restriction.Keep Number.isInteger and SAFE source guards distinct,while preserving ORIGINAL JSON number representations.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R67_SOURCE_specific_keys_operation_domain_and_numeric_bank · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

Proportion missing ORIGINAL a times d := mul(-5, 4)

After

Proportion missing ORIGINAL a times d = -20

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands.Legacy derived integers are not recapped at the RAW SAFE bound;MOD50 rationals separately retain the NAIVE pre-reduction source envelope.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Proportion missing ORIGINAL ad divided by nonzero b := div(-20, -1)

After

Proportion missing ORIGINAL ad divided by nonzero b = 20

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands.Legacy derived integers are not recapped at the RAW SAFE bound;MOD50 rationals separately retain the NAIVE pre-reduction source envelope.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

Proportion missing ORIGINAL solved x divided by nonzero d := div(20, 4)

After

Proportion missing ORIGINAL solved x divided by nonzero d = 5

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands.Legacy derived integers are not recapped at the RAW SAFE bound;MOD50 rationals separately retain the NAIVE pre-reduction source envelope.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

source roles = [-5, -1, 4]

After

derived = [20/1, 5/1, 5/1]

Conditions: none

From a/b=x/d,FIRST require b,d≠0.Cross-multiply to bx=ad and divide by b for the UNIQUE x=ad/b.Substitute back into x/d=a/b.Reduce the result with positive denominator and RETAIN/1 for integers;do not alter original negative denominators.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Proportion_SOLVE_nonzero_b_unique_and_SUBSTITUTE_both_ratios · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against the ORIGINAL roles,complete premises and field order.Distinguish implication from equivalence;preserve originals,English,MKOs,ASTs and review states.Finite checks are not independent review or general formal proof.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Proportion missing ORIGINAL solved x divided by nonzero d with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Proportion missing ORIGINAL ad divided by nonzero b with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Proportion missing ORIGINAL a times d with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against the ORIGINAL roles,complete premises and field order.Distinguish implication from equivalence;preserve originals,English,MKOs,ASTs and review states.Finite checks are not independent review or general formal proof.

Result

20/1

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 70113127112e00714cd74b51cbc48bada0173b5a035687585e66761169568530
  • candidate record SHA-256: d877d7da9bfacfe9974c32be769d7a24b4b7b85f2b633aabe64da2f31911a886
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: c89efa383b67bb2cf25bcf16160b9f5f614bbe5e5e791f4d7f58234d17a3371c
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 12766d451c5375842b4fc2843ae94807ec55f15763a916558026912a13873d57
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON