Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 3090: Comparing Two Composition Orders

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 16

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0005-03090 · q-20260930-r04-composition-order-comparison-0015

Original question and givens

Let f(t)=(-3)t+(2) and g(t)=(2)t+(5). At the explicit input x=2, are (g∘f)(x) and (f∘g)(x) equal?

  • G001 — Let f(t)=(-3)t+(2) and g(t)=(2)t+(5). At the explicit input x=2, are (g∘f)(x) and (f∘g)(x) equal?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

(g∘f)(x)

After

g(f(x)):apply f first,then g

Conditions: none

The function on the right acts first;composition is not multiplication of two function values.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: composition_order · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

f(x) product := mul(-3, 2)

After

f(x) product = -6

Conditions: none

Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

f(x) value := sum(-6, 2)

After

f(x) value = -4

Conditions: none

Then add this function's own constant term.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

g(f(x)) product := mul(2, -4)

After

g(f(x)) product = -8

Conditions: none

Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

g(f(x)) value := sum(-8, 5)

After

g(f(x)) value = -3

Conditions: none

Then add this function's own constant term.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

g(x) product := mul(2, 2)

After

g(x) product = 4

Conditions: none

Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

g(x) value := sum(4, 5)

After

g(x) value = 9

Conditions: none

Then add this function's own constant term.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

f(g(x)) product := mul(-3, 9)

After

f(g(x)) product = -27

Conditions: none

Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · calculation

Before

f(g(x)) value := sum(-27, 2)

After

f(g(x)) value = -25

Conditions: none

Then add this function's own constant term.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

g(f(2))=-3;f(g(2))=-25

After

equal at supplied input=No

Conditions: none

Compare the supplied input only;one-point equality of arbitrary functions does not prove commutation everywhere.A separate affine coefficient identity could address this particular model globally.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: pointwise_composition_comparison · Uses: G001, S009

Reverse checks

  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(g(x)) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(g(x)) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(x) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(x) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(f(x)) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(f(x)) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(x) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(x) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

No

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 105f0b0d20548494e05d518ea313b9663d5240cf6a9e44961b9e86c494a181ae
  • candidate record SHA-256: d4a7fc9dc21b866168a56c9d4da44a2482832e00ec66e051946bb2f04e7c2138
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5d74de11610ebc6037a4fc9946d77154d4ed18389f8f0feeb823148b6320c4c2
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 1fba4ab0f13c2cfcc4d9fdebe492c442d43dd45700394a443daa28f333355ed9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON