S001 · implies
Before
(g∘f)(x)
After
g(f(x)):apply f first,then g
Conditions: none
The function on the right acts first;composition is not multiplication of two function values.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: composition_order · Uses: G001
Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0005-03090 · q-20260930-r04-composition-order-comparison-0015
Let f(t)=(-3)t+(2) and g(t)=(2)t+(5). At the explicit input x=2, are (g∘f)(x) and (f∘g)(x) equal?
G001 — Let f(t)=(-3)t+(2) and g(t)=(2)t+(5). At the explicit input x=2, are (g∘f)(x) and (f∘g)(x) equal?Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
(g∘f)(x)
After
g(f(x)):apply f first,then g
Conditions: none
The function on the right acts first;composition is not multiplication of two function values.
Rule: composition_order · Uses: G001
Before
f(x) product := mul(-3, 2)
After
f(x) product = -6
Conditions: none
Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
Before
f(x) value := sum(-6, 2)
After
f(x) value = -4
Conditions: none
Then add this function's own constant term.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002
Before
g(f(x)) product := mul(2, -4)
After
g(f(x)) product = -8
Conditions: none
Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003
Before
g(f(x)) value := sum(-8, 5)
After
g(f(x)) value = -3
Conditions: none
Then add this function's own constant term.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004
Before
g(x) product := mul(2, 2)
After
g(x) product = 4
Conditions: none
Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005
Before
g(x) value := sum(4, 5)
After
g(x) value = 9
Conditions: none
Then add this function's own constant term.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006
Before
f(g(x)) product := mul(-3, 9)
After
f(g(x)) product = -27
Conditions: none
Substitute the current input and multiply by the coefficient.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007
Before
f(g(x)) value := sum(-27, 2)
After
f(g(x)) value = -25
Conditions: none
Then add this function's own constant term.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008
Before
g(f(2))=-3;f(g(2))=-25
After
equal at supplied input=No
Conditions: none
Compare the supplied input only;one-point equality of arbitrary functions does not prove commutation everywhere.A separate affine coefficient identity could address this particular model globally.
Rule: pointwise_composition_comparison · Uses: G001, S009
S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(g(x)) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(g(x)) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(x) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(x) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(f(x)) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute g(f(x)) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(x) value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute f(x) product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.No
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 105f0b0d20548494e05d518ea313b9663d5240cf6a9e44961b9e86c494a181aecandidate record SHA-256: d4a7fc9dc21b866168a56c9d4da44a2482832e00ec66e051946bb2f04e7c2138semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5d74de11610ebc6037a4fc9946d77154d4ed18389f8f0feeb823148b6320c4c2question-first witness SHA-256: 1fba4ab0f13c2cfcc4d9fdebe492c442d43dd45700394a443daa28f333355ed9Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED