Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 3004: Exact Unordered Selection Count

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 16

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0005-03004 · q-20260930-r06-combination-exact-count-0004

Original question and givens

Select k=2 objects without order, replacement, or repetition from n=2 distinct objects. The empty selection counts once. Find C(2,2).

  • G001 — Select k=2 objects without order, replacement, or repetition from n=2 distinct objects. The empty selection counts once. Find C(2,2).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

n=2;k=2;distinct objects,without replacement

After

unordered k-subsets of an n-element set

Conditions: none

Each object is selected at most once and order is ignored;the ordered-selection count is not the requested answer.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: unordered_selection_model · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

choices at position1 := sub(2, 0)

After

choices at position1 = 2

Conditions: none

After i distinct selections,n−i objects remain available.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

ordered prefix count1 := mul(1, 2)

After

ordered prefix count1 = 2

Conditions: none

The product rule accumulates the ordered count without repetition.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

choices at position2 := sub(2, 1)

After

choices at position2 = 1

Conditions: none

After i distinct selections,n−i objects remain available.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

ordered prefix count2 := mul(2, 1)

After

ordered prefix count2 = 2

Conditions: none

The product rule accumulates the ordered count without repetition.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

factorial through2 := mul(1, 2)

After

factorial through2 = 2

Conditions: none

Accumulate k!,the number of orders of the same selected k-element set.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

ordered selections=2;orders per subset=2

After

C(2,2)=ordered selections/k!

Conditions: none

Every k-subset has exactly k! orderings,and different subsets have disjoint orderings;divide by this common positive factor.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: uniform_order_fibers · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

unordered subset count := div(2, 2)

After

unordered subset count = 1

Conditions: none

Exact division gives an integer;when k=0 both empty products are1 and there is exactly one empty selection.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

C(2,2)=n!/(k!·(n−k)!)

After

C(2,2)=2/(2·1)=1

Conditions: none

Rewrite the falling product as n!/(n−k)! and audit the binomial formula,including boundary cases.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: binomial_count_formula · Uses: G001, S008

Reverse checks

  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute unordered subset count with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute factorial through2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ordered prefix count2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute choices at position2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ordered prefix count1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute choices at position1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

1

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 78df56b824ce975b03272dbf42f60792d09d14894babd7bc49573059d821a4de
  • candidate record SHA-256: 68ed55a3118846cf81fc30eaae2e94f16cd19d5a3b50e9cbeda6898b911adcc9
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5d74de11610ebc6037a4fc9946d77154d4ed18389f8f0feeb823148b6320c4c2
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 1fba4ab0f13c2cfcc4d9fdebe492c442d43dd45700394a443daa28f333355ed9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON