Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 34182: Exact Ordered Selection Count

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 171

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0067-34182 · q-20260930-r06-permutation-exact-count-0007

Original question and givens

Select k=2 objects in order, without replacement or repetition, from n=4 distinct objects. The empty selection counts once. Find P(4,2).

  • G001 — Select k=2 objects in order, without replacement or repetition, from n=4 distinct objects. The empty selection counts once. Find P(4,2).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-permutation-exact-count, [k, n, operation]]

After

derived = [permutation, no-invented-domain]

Conditions: none

Check THIS bank’s keys/operation/domain:legacy table underscores,MOD50 local hyphens;permissive BASE data acquires no unknown-field restriction.Keep Number.isInteger and SAFE source guards distinct,while preserving ORIGINAL JSON number representations.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R67_SOURCE_specific_keys_operation_domain_and_numeric_bank · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [4, 2]

After

derived = [[4, 3], 1]

Conditions: none

Choose ordered positions from n DISTINCT objects WITHOUT replacement.Position i has n−i+1 choices.For k=0,the empty selection counts ONCE and the product starts at1.THIS bank permits n≤200,not another bank’s32/64 cap.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Selection_DISTINCT_no_replacement_order_and_EMPTY_convention · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

Permutation ORIGINAL available choices position1 := mul(1, 4)

After

Permutation ORIGINAL available choices position1 = 4

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands.Legacy derived integers are not recapped at the RAW SAFE bound;MOD50 rationals separately retain the NAIVE pre-reduction source envelope.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

Permutation ORIGINAL available choices position2 := mul(4, 3)

After

Permutation ORIGINAL available choices position2 = 12

Conditions: none

Calculate exactly from ORIGINAL ordered operands.Legacy derived integers are not recapped at the RAW SAFE bound;MOD50 rationals separately retain the NAIVE pre-reduction source envelope.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

source roles = [4, 2]

After

derived = [12]

Conditions: none

The multiplication principle combines ALL k position counts,giving P(n,k)=n!/(n−k)!.This is a count,not probability.The empty product is1 and derived BigInts are not truncated to SAFE.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Selection_ALL_ordered_choices_falling_product · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against the ORIGINAL roles,complete premises and field order.Distinguish implication from equivalence;preserve originals,English,MKOs,ASTs and review states.Finite checks are not independent review or general formal proof.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Permutation ORIGINAL available choices position2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute Permutation ORIGINAL available choices position1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against the ORIGINAL roles,complete premises and field order.Distinguish implication from equivalence;preserve originals,English,MKOs,ASTs and review states.Finite checks are not independent review or general formal proof.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against the ORIGINAL roles,complete premises and field order.Distinguish implication from equivalence;preserve originals,English,MKOs,ASTs and review states.Finite checks are not independent review or general formal proof.

Result

12

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 2eb98451399182ec233a26cdb4ea7f0bd0b5d8bdee54348c198f3aed0f621417
  • candidate record SHA-256: 23526568c93fd82d08beeef33f54d29be594311cba449f434cb4d5334e8c9f36
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: c89efa383b67bb2cf25bcf16160b9f5f614bbe5e5e791f4d7f58234d17a3371c
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 12766d451c5375842b4fc2843ae94807ec55f15763a916558026912a13873d57
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON