Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 3162: Positive-Probability Eligibility of a Conditioning Event

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 16

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0005-03162 · q-20261003-advance-20261004-r07-conditional-probability-0062

Original question and givens

The nonempty finite sample space is S={-1, 0, 1, 2}, with event family F=𝒫(S). In the displayed order of S, the nonnegative normalized weights are [2/(21), 4/(21), 3/(21), 12/(21)], summing exactly to one. Does B={-1, 0, 1, 2} meet the positive-probability requirement for defining P(A|B)?

  • G001 — The nonempty finite sample space is S={-1, 0, 1, 2}, with event family F=𝒫(S). In the displayed order of S, the nonnegative normalized weights are [2/(21), 4/(21), 3/(21), 12/(21)], summing exactly to one. Does B={-1, 0, 1, 2} meet the positive-probability requirement for defining P(A|B)?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

S={-1, 0, 1, 2};no particular A supplied;B={-1, 0, 1, 2};F=𝒫(S)

After

events are declared subsets;conditioning needs P(B)>0

Conditions: none

𝒫(S) is the full event powerset,not a probability value.A nonempty event may have probability0.When checking B's eligibility,do not invent an unspecified A.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: conditional_model_domain · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

total weight numerator := sum(2, 4, 3, 12)

After

total weight numerator = 21

Conditions: none

Nonnegative weights must sum to the common positive denominator to give total probability1.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

[[-1, 2], [0, 4], [1, 3], [2, 12]]

After

weights sum to 21;normalization verified

Conditions: none

Weights align with the original S order;do not sort S while leaving weights in their old positions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: weight_alignment_and_normalization · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

B weight numerator := sum(2, 4, 3, 12)

After

B weight numerator = 21

Conditions: none

Sum aligned weights over the event;zero-mass outcomes do not become positive mass.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

B probability mass := div(21, 21)

After

B probability mass = 1

Conditions: none

Divide by the common positive denominator to obtain exact probability.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

P(B)=1

After

conditioning eligible=Yes

Conditions: none

The ordinary conditional ratio requires P(B)>0;when P(B)=0 do not assign0 to an undefined ratio.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: positive_conditioning_eligibility · Uses: G001, S005

Reverse checks

  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute B probability mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute B weight numerator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute total weight numerator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

Yes

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 290ed11bc3dd9c08667ab32d2374f641c6bdb45a6d1cf10f32d933ce6ae2d334
  • candidate record SHA-256: d57ed80b0b137ca03283ccdfd76f2f00d7be4bbd2b50d8cb132f3a34cc9d2ec0
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5d74de11610ebc6037a4fc9946d77154d4ed18389f8f0feeb823148b6320c4c2
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 1fba4ab0f13c2cfcc4d9fdebe492c442d43dd45700394a443daa28f333355ed9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON