The nonempty finite sample space is S={6, 7, 8, 9}, with event family F=𝒫(S). In the displayed order of S, the nonnegative normalized weights are [0/(27), 3/(27), 5/(27), 19/(27)], summing exactly to one. A={6, 7, 8, 9}, B={7, 8}, and both P(A) and P(B) are positive. Are P(A|B) and P(B|A) equal?
G001 — The nonempty finite sample space is S={6, 7, 8, 9}, with event family F=𝒫(S). In the displayed order of S, the nonnegative normalized weights are [0/(27), 3/(27), 5/(27), 19/(27)], summing exactly to one. A={6, 7, 8, 9}, B={7, 8}, and both P(A) and P(B) are positive. Are P(A|B) and P(B|A) equal?
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
events are declared subsets;conditioning needs P(B)>0
Conditions: none
𝒫(S) is the full event powerset,not a probability value.A nonempty event may have probability0.When checking B's eligibility,do not invent an unspecified A.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: conditional_model_domain · Uses: G001
S002 · implies
Before
A={6, 7, 8, 9};B={7, 8}
After
A∩B={7, 8}
Conditions: none
The intersection keeps outcomes in both events;neither a union nor independence is assumed.
Equality of the two directions is only a numerical relation,not independence.Independence instead requires P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B);disjoint positive-probability events have both conditionals0 but are dependent.
S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute P(B|A) with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute A probability mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute A weight numerator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute P(A|B) with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute A∩B probability mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute A∩B weight numerator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute B probability mass with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute B weight numerator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute total weight numerator with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
No
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.