Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 28225: Exact Natural-Number Power

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 142

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0055-28225 · q-20261003-r01-power-root-0025

Original question and givens

For real bases and natural-number exponents, use the empty-product convention a^0=1, including 0^0=1 in this algebraic setting. Compute (12)^0 exactly.

  • G001 — For real bases and natural-number exponents, use the empty-product convention a^0=1, including 0^0=1 in this algebraic setting. Compute (12)^0 exactly.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-natural-power-exact, natural_power]

After

derived = [[exact_integer_power]]

Conditions: none

List this scalar/label/set/point answer role or mode-specific ordered fields,not an imposed universal tuple.Retain legacy domain/underscore operation and integer fractions with/1;original bilingual snapshots stay unchanged.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: source_answer_roles_or_ordered_fields_without_JS · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [12, 0, empty_product]

After

derived = [1, positive]

Conditions: none

The n0 empty product is1,including0^0=1 in THIS algebraic setting,not a limit rule.For n>0 a zero base gives0;otherwise sign follows base sign and exponent parity.All BigInt results remain exact without derived SAFE/1e8 clipping.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Legacy_power_ALL_n_products_EMPTYproduct_n0_and_sign_parity · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check complete original data,operands and premises;finite checks,conditional reasoning,formal proof and publication authority remain distinct.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check complete original data,operands and premises;finite checks,conditional reasoning,formal proof and publication authority remain distinct.

Result

1

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 56ea32f4671e149019ed27263517f78eb576d72e79bfe9b7142624dc7bd04cd7
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9988f569405f2f2fbafed727087d957e30a4737cbd89880d544a78b9812fd6e7
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 6af367dae24a584f3596525c4953bbc2115343efd68cc9083693eb5c1ef2e683
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 611eb69f3716404b968296a8b0d7d8c61b5ca18129d406f1ff9c7c11e10ffb4e
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON