The declared domain is D={33, 34} and codomain is B={11, 12, 13}. Is the ordered-pair set {(33, 11)} exactly the graph of a total function D→B?
G001 — The declared domain is D={33, 34} and codomain is B={11, 12, 13}. Is the ordered-pair set {(33, 11)} exactly the graph of a total function D→B?
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
The domain is the declared finite integer subset,not automatically all R.The input list must already be distinct.The first coordinate is input,the second output.
This protocol treats the graph as a set:deduplicate identical pairs,but retain different y values at one x.This differs from a raw-row protocol requiring one original row per input.
all pair type flags=[Yes];source fiber sizes=[1, 0]
After
total function graph=No
Conditions: none
Typing and totality are joint conditions.An empty domain with an empty graph is valid,but extra outside pairs are not.The valid empty function does not require a nonempty codomain.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
No
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.