Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 34097: Minimum and Maximum of a Finite Real Set

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 171

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0067-34097 · q-20261005-advance-20261006-r01-order-relation-0047

Original question and givens

Under the usual real order, the explicit finite nonempty set has elements {-21, 0, 23}. Give (minimum, maximum).

  • G001 — Under the usual real order, the explicit finite nonempty set has elements {-21, 0, 23}. Give (minimum, maximum).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-order-finite-extrema, [operation, values]]

After

derived = [finite_extrema, no-invented-domain]

Conditions: none

Check THIS bank’s keys/operation/domain:legacy table underscores,MOD50 local hyphens;permissive BASE data acquires no unknown-field restriction.Keep Number.isInteger and SAFE source guards distinct,while preserving ORIGINAL JSON number representations.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R67_SOURCE_specific_keys_operation_domain_and_numeric_bank · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [[-21, 0, 23]]

After

derived = [[-21, 0, 23], [[-21, Yes], [0, Yes], [23, Yes]], -21, 23]

Conditions: none

This is a NONEMPTY finite SET of at most100 DISTINCT elements,not an observation multiset.Audit min≤x≤max for EVERY element and attainment at both endpoints.A singleton has equal extrema;the empty set is outside THIS protocol.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Order_FINITE_nonempty_DISTINCT_set_ALL_extrema_bounds · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against the ORIGINAL roles,complete premises and field order.Distinguish implication from equivalence;preserve originals,English,MKOs,ASTs and review states.Finite checks are not independent review or general formal proof.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS step against the ORIGINAL roles,complete premises and field order.Distinguish implication from equivalence;preserve originals,English,MKOs,ASTs and review states.Finite checks are not independent review or general formal proof.

Result

(-21, 23)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 91eb23762fb79ac31a6e7e1eacd28f36362c20d26f03a520dceb3d264535a4a1
  • candidate record SHA-256: 3d65a81909fb5c697b9e93a0bf3f686954371a86929c65b498562d6428cd7171
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: c89efa383b67bb2cf25bcf16160b9f5f614bbe5e5e791f4d7f58234d17a3371c
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 12766d451c5375842b4fc2843ae94807ec55f15763a916558026912a13873d57
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON