Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 28802: Positive Length-Scale Eligibility

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 145

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0056-28802 · q-20261006-advance-20261007-r06-similarity-0027

Original question and givens

Use one equal-unit orthonormal Euclidean Cartesian frame. With positive denominator q=1, is k=-11/1 an eligible positive length scale for nondegenerate similarity?

  • G001 — Use one equal-unit orthonormal Euclidean Cartesian frame. With positive denominator q=1, is k=-11/1 an eligible positive length scale for nondegenerate similarity?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-similarity-positive-ratio, positive_scale_ratio]

After

derived = [positive_length_scale_eligibility]

Conditions: none

Use the declared scalar/set/Yes-No/fraction answer role;integer fractions retain/1.Do not add an undeclared domain or change original bilingual data,formulas or questions.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R56_source_answer_role_and_EXACT_family_interface · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [-11, 1, euclidean_orthonormal_equal_units]

After

derived = [No, No]

Conditions: none

With q>0 a LENGTH similarity ratio p/q must be strictly positive.p=0 or negative is a legal No,not an exception for signed coordinate reflections.Do not repair it by taking abs(p).

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Similarity_length_scale_strict_positive_p_zero_negative_LEGAL_No · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check EACH original datum and premise,retaining indices,signs and strict/non-strict boundaries.A correct final answer cannot replace the derivation obligations.This is candidate teaching/exact checking,not formal proof or publication clearance.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-check EACH original datum and premise,retaining indices,signs and strict/non-strict boundaries.A correct final answer cannot replace the derivation obligations.This is candidate teaching/exact checking,not formal proof or publication clearance.

Result

No

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 253459c6efcc98cdbfc6a9d020556af4630405b19fecf75cbad89d3f83eb7dfa
  • candidate record SHA-256: 230f4ea8e98748d05c3a4bee9b00211be8d4c7811b996ce154cfde7de9ced056
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 8bbda4edbed7078634ae88342998c79bcfb95de96187fac119c3b08e0adb0bc8
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 3edafa72d63d16a22414892b55806430e0a25b15b926d04f312550179607759f
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON