Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 3365: Continuity with Two Sides and a Defined Center Value

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 17

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0005-03365 · q-20261007-advance-20261008-r03-continuity-0040

Original question and givens

The function is defined on all R. The left branch at x<2 is (3)x+(-5); the right branch at x>2 is (-3)x+(9). Its explicit center value is f(2)=1. Is it continuous at 2?

  • G001 — The function is defined on all R. The left branch at x<2 is (3)x+(-5); the right branch at x>2 is (-3)x+(9). Its explicit center value is f(2)=1. Is it continuous at 2?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

declared real model;center a=2

After

distinguish punctured limits,point values and a new extension

Conditions: none

Use the declared real formulas;point values,punctured limits and values of a newly defined extension are different data.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: continuity_model_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

left branch slope times center := mul(3, 2)

After

left branch slope times center = 6

Conditions: none

Substitute the center a into this affine formula's product term.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

left branch center value := sum(6, -5)

After

left branch center value = 1

Conditions: none

Then add this branch's intercept,not the other branch's constant.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

right branch slope times center := mul(-3, 2)

After

right branch slope times center = -6

Conditions: none

Substitute the center a into this affine formula's product term.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

right branch center value := sum(-6, 9)

After

right branch center value = 3

Conditions: none

Then add this branch's intercept,not the other branch's constant.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

left L=1;right R=3;given f(a)=1

After

these are one-sided limits,not automatic point substitutions into f(a)

Conditions: none

For an affine branch the difference from its center limit L is m(x−a).For any ε>0 choose δ=ε/(1+|m|) to obtain the one-sided limit.The actual center value remains the separately specified v.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: affine_one_sided_limits · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

left limit minus point value := sub(1, 1)

After

left limit minus point value = 0

Conditions: none

Compute the left limit minus the actual point value.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

right limit minus point value := sub(3, 1)

After

right limit minus point value = 2

Conditions: none

Compare the right limit with the same actual point value.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

L−f(a)=0;R−f(a)=2

After

continuous at a=No

Conditions: none

In this real model with affine one-sided limits,continuity holds exactly when both limits and the point value agree.Equal left and right limits alone may still leave an incorrect center value.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: two_sided_limit_equals_point · Uses: G001, S008

Reverse checks

  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute right limit minus point value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute left limit minus point value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute right branch center value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute right branch slope times center with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute left branch center value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute left branch slope times center with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

No

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: a114e50c8a6acd10c0b78a3188c38419b61d5d16a4488a8e8ea6e5fa2daef434
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9339f881ccdb08a797e7aefbd76cdac127d53a89ac5700d87766af8108593abb
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 5d74de11610ebc6037a4fc9946d77154d4ed18389f8f0feeb823148b6320c4c2
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 1fba4ab0f13c2cfcc4d9fdebe492c442d43dd45700394a443daa28f333355ed9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON