Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 1325: Zero-Constant Antiderivative of a Monomial

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 7

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0001-01325 · q-20261007-advance-20261008-r06-antiderivative-0025

Original question and givens

On all R, f(x)=(25)x^0, with 0≤n≤5 and x^0=1 even at zero. Give ascending reduced rational coefficients of its zero-constant primitive.

  • G001 — On all R, f(x)=(25)x^0, with 0≤n≤5 and x^0=1 even at zero. Give ascending reduced rational coefficients of its zero-constant primitive.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

domain=R; coefficient lists are in ascending powers

After

constant term first; rational pairs=[numerator,denominator]

Conditions: none

Fix coefficient order;do not read ascending coefficients as descending or swap numerator and denominator.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: polynomial_representation · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

f coefficients ascending=[25]

After

seek F₀ with constant coefficient0 and F₀′=f

Conditions: none

Antiderivatives are not generally unique; this task additionally fixes the constant coefficient at0.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: canonical_primitive_domain · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

primitive coefficient at degree1 := div(25, 1)

After

primitive coefficient at degree1 = 25

Conditions: none

Since (x^(k+1))′=(k+1)x^k,divide the coefficient by the positive nonzero integer k+1.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

differentiate back coefficient0 := mul(25, 1)

After

differentiate back coefficient0 = 25

Conditions: none

Differentiation multiplies back by k+1 and must recover the original coefficient.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

[0, 25]

After

all derivative coefficients agree with f

Conditions: none

Coefficient agreement proves the polynomial identity on all reals,not merely equality at a few points.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: global_polynomial_identity · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

[0, 25]

After

reduced coefficients;integer coefficients retain /1

Conditions: none

Return ascending coefficients,trim redundant leading-in-degree zeros,and retain[0/1] for the zero polynomial.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: coefficient_output_protocol · Uses: G001, S005

Reverse checks

  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute differentiate back coefficient0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute primitive coefficient at degree1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

[0/1, 25/1]

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 57d6b794cf1a5a2983b70534dd9c11ce16b2d02e8b5d93f761c9ecedd1264722
  • candidate record SHA-256: 562e92419668fb07246d5904d8060260847309aefc822ca520d8ad228d4e3d99
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: c3b44ce8ed60ada6902fb206627537d5f90ba2a867eaba43a36f903280c496cc
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 3e91602adc7f81a2671a2a3ffaf6a447028b56abc5853e8271673d76f30cd7ad
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON