Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 35459: Nonempty Finite-Graph Tree Eligibility

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 178

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0069-35459 · q-20261007-advance-20261009-r02-tree-0009

Original question and givens

The finite simple undirected graph has V=[0, 1, 2, 3] and E=[]. Edges are unordered, with repeated listings normalized and no loops or absent endpoints. Under the explicit nonempty-tree convention, is the graph nonempty, connected, and acyclic?

  • G001 — The finite simple undirected graph has V=[0, 1, 2, 3] and E=[]. Edges are unordered, with repeated listings normalized and no loops or absent endpoints. Under the explicit nonempty-tree convention, is the graph nonempty, connected, and acyclic?

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source roles = [qf-tree-property, [E, V, domain, operation]]

After

derived = [tree_property, finite_simple_undirected]

Conditions: none

Keep EACH bank’s keys/operation/domain distinct:LDL/PULSE/function legacy table underscores,TREE full tree_* with its declared domain,and permissive BASE signed without invented op/domain.All arithmetic respects the binary-primitive contract.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: R69_SOURCE_specific_keys_operation_domain_AND_binary_contract · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source roles = [TREE vertices ORIGINAL, 10, [0, 1, 2, 3]]

After

derived = [[0, 1, 2, 3]]

Conditions: none

Type EVERY RAW SAFE label,distinctness and THIS bank’s cardinality bound;empty is allowed.Sort ONLY the derived representation,not original JSON.Do not exchange TREE and LDL limits.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Finite_RAW_ALL_SAFE_distinct_labels_then_derived_sort · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

source roles = [[0, 1, 2, 3], [], Yes]

After

derived = [[], [[0, []], [1, []], [2, []], [3, []]]]

Conditions: none

Type the WHOLE raw edge list,then normalize undirected endpoints/deduplicate;reversed duplicates are allowed.INPUT edges have no loops/outside endpoints,while isolated vertices stay in V.TREE raw E does NOT acquire LDL’s200-entry limit.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Graph_WHOLE_simple_undirected_edges_normalized_NO_loops_or_outside · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source roles = [0, []]

After

derived = [[0], [0]]

Conditions: none

Expand actual neighbors from the least label and retain reached vertices.Edge count|V|−1 ALONE does not replace connectivity.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Tree_CONNECTIVITY_actual_reachability_from_min_label · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

source roles = [[0, 1, 2, 3], []]

After

derived = [Yes, No, Yes, No]

Conditions: none

THIS entry defines a tree as NONEMPTY,connected and acyclic.Empty graph is No;an edgeless singleton is Yes.A triangle plus an isolated vertex is No EVEN when|E|=|V|−1.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: Tree_NONEMPTY_connected_acyclic_ALL_three · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS question’s ORIGINAL data,types,roles,complete premises and field order.Do not invert implication or turn finite-table checks into infinite-domain/formal proof.Original Q/English/MKO/AST/status remain unchanged.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS question’s ORIGINAL data,types,roles,complete premises and field order.Do not invert implication or turn finite-table checks into infinite-domain/formal proof.Original Q/English/MKO/AST/status remain unchanged.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS question’s ORIGINAL data,types,roles,complete premises and field order.Do not invert implication or turn finite-table checks into infinite-domain/formal proof.Original Q/English/MKO/AST/status remain unchanged.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS question’s ORIGINAL data,types,roles,complete premises and field order.Do not invert implication or turn finite-table checks into infinite-domain/formal proof.Original Q/English/MKO/AST/status remain unchanged.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Reverse-audit THIS question’s ORIGINAL data,types,roles,complete premises and field order.Do not invert implication or turn finite-table checks into infinite-domain/formal proof.Original Q/English/MKO/AST/status remain unchanged.

Result

No

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 32439e815ef9f4e7b37f0910a09d79224e971e67681e403900990027df23728f
  • candidate record SHA-256: f2e83358547388325725661b046bc1903e4309385c3f81d3bc70f9cb17f4dd69
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: ccf93c72638d6abf6a412514da5838d55ecb09b71d0e4fdec2b559dc9fdee14b
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 11af9a338b5a610342b2cfb2ee295683131b3139ac402dd19b1ba1725976d518
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON