Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 4471: Ordered Three-Part Set Partition

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 23

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0007-04471 · q-20261008-advance-20261010-r02-set-operations-0096

Original question and givens

Finite integer sets A=[-20, 0, 20] and B=[0, 20, 21]; repeated elements count once. Give (A\B, A∩B, B\A), each sorted increasingly, retaining empty parts.

  • G001 — Finite integer sets A=[-20, 0, 20] and B=[0, 20, 21]; repeated elements count once. Give (A\B, A∩B, B\A), each sorted increasingly, retaining empty parts.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

raw A=[-20, 0, 20];raw B=[0, 20, 21]

After

A=[-20, 0, 20];B=[0, 20, 21]

Conditions: none

Deduplicate and numerically sort integer sets;repetition and input order do not change membership.The original lists remain retained.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_set_extensionality · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

element=-20

After

in A=Yes;in B=No

Conditions: none

Record membership on both sides for each element;these Boolean values determine the set operations without duplicate counting.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_set_membership_row · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

element=0

After

in A=Yes;in B=Yes

Conditions: none

Record membership on both sides for each element;these Boolean values determine the set operations without duplicate counting.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_set_membership_row · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

element=20

After

in A=Yes;in B=Yes

Conditions: none

Record membership on both sides for each element;these Boolean values determine the set operations without duplicate counting.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_set_membership_row · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

element=21

After

in A=No;in B=Yes

Conditions: none

Record membership on both sides for each element;these Boolean values determine the set operations without duplicate counting.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_set_membership_row · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

A∪B=[-20, 0, 20, 21]

After

([-20], [0, 20], [21])

Conditions: none

Keep the order left-only,shared,right-only;the parts are pairwise disjoint and cover the union,including empty parts.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: ordered_three_way_set_partition · Uses: G001, S005

Reverse checks

  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([-20], [0, 20], [21])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 1c2cbdb694b63817b8c22f9c24b52eb69099f02a665f69fdd1e7cdce6157ce3a
  • candidate record SHA-256: 6aae8b4c8c928033c6c5489f52b33387d8b1095c6dbfbb72efd01fce5ccdc89f
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: faf0582c0184613e6fae207374056133eae600883a29c67d8438113bbe3c485a
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 4b283b6ff424b1d22caa36f3552b0fa21b1b66a0a883d7cbe9cedc8dd77b2e42
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON