Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 4341: Negated Universal and Existential Pair

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 22

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0007-04341 · q-20261008-advance-20261010-r07-quantifier-0041

Original question and givens

The explicitly finite integer domain is U=[-5, -4, -3, -2, -1] and P(x) means x≥0. Give (¬∀x∈U P(x), ¬∃x∈U P(x)) using True/False, retaining the empty-domain convention.

  • G001 — The explicitly finite integer domain is U=[-5, -4, -3, -2, -1] and P(x) means x≥0. Give (¬∀x∈U P(x), ¬∃x∈U P(x)) using True/False, retaining the empty-domain convention.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

complete finite U=[-5, -4, -3, -2, -1]

After

universal on empty domain=True;existential on empty domain=False

Conditions: none

Enumerate only the declared finite domain;empty-domain universals are true and existentials false.Complete finite enumeration does not extend to an infinite domain.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_quantifier_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

x=-5;predicate=ge 0

After

P(x)=No

Conditions: none

Evaluate the declared decidable integer predicate for each element,retaining both true and false cases.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_predicate_row · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

x=-4;predicate=ge 0

After

P(x)=No

Conditions: none

Evaluate the declared decidable integer predicate for each element,retaining both true and false cases.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_predicate_row · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

x=-3;predicate=ge 0

After

P(x)=No

Conditions: none

Evaluate the declared decidable integer predicate for each element,retaining both true and false cases.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_predicate_row · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

x=-2;predicate=ge 0

After

P(x)=No

Conditions: none

Evaluate the declared decidable integer predicate for each element,retaining both true and false cases.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_predicate_row · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

x=-1;predicate=ge 0

After

P(x)=No

Conditions: none

Evaluate the declared decidable integer predicate for each element,retaining both true and false cases.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_predicate_row · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

[[-5, No], [-4, No], [-3, No], [-2, No], [-1, No]]

After

T=[];F=[-5, -4, -3, -2, -1];T∪F=U and T∩F=∅

Conditions: none

The true and false parts are disjoint and cover the deduplicated domain;unlisted integers are not counterexamples.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_truth_partition · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

false-element count=5;true-element count=0

After

(True, True)

Conditions: none

Not-all P means at least one false element,and not-any P means no true element;the empty domain therefore gives(False,True).Do not confuse the universal with its negation.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_quantifier_negations · Uses: G001, S007

Reverse checks

  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(True, True)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 1c4d6f7710fc98ac9561308d064f389be37e2aa61b205006d245d30ed34d4487
  • candidate record SHA-256: 54c68487c3f3bb310b39a33a48877e6af5315fa0159c4b3ff6ad13d45a06579c
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: faf0582c0184613e6fae207374056133eae600883a29c67d8438113bbe3c485a
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 4b283b6ff424b1d22caa36f3552b0fa21b1b66a0a883d7cbe9cedc8dd77b2e42
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON