The explicitly finite integer domain is U=[] and P(x) means x≥0. Ordered candidates=[100, 101, 102]. For each, answer Yes/No to membership in U together with failure of P; outside candidates are ineligible.
G001 — The explicitly finite integer domain is U=[] and P(x) means x≥0. Ordered candidates=[100, 101, 102]. For each, answer Yes/No to membership in U together with failure of P; outside candidates are ineligible.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
universal on empty domain=True;existential on empty domain=False
Conditions: none
Enumerate only the declared finite domain;empty-domain universals are true and existentials false.Complete finite enumeration does not extend to an infinite domain.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: finite_quantifier_scope · Uses: G001
S002 · implies
Before
[]
After
T=[];F=[];T∪F=U and T∩F=∅
Conditions: none
The true and false parts are disjoint and cover the deduplicated domain;unlisted integers are not counterexamples.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: complete_truth_partition · Uses: G001, S001
S003 · implies
Before
candidate=100;inside=No;predicate if inside=null
After
No
Conditions: none
Check membership before predicate failure;preserve candidate order and repeated positions,and reject outside-domain candidates.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
[No, No, No]
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.