Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 4995: Recording Codes and Outcome Fibers

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 25

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0008-04995 · q-20261008-advance-20261011-r06-sample-space-0045

Original question and givens

Elementary outcomes are Fin(4)={0,…,3}, with recording=[-19, 0, -19, 19] in original index order. Give (increasing distinct recording codes, aligned original-index fiber lists), sorting each fiber increasingly.

  • G001 — Elementary outcomes are Fin(4)={0,…,3}, with recording=[-19, 0, -19, 19] in original index order. Give (increasing distinct recording codes, aligned original-index fiber lists), sorting each fiber increasingly.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

explicit finite possible-outcome protocol

After

no probability law,equiprobability or independence inferred

Conditions: none

These tasks list possible outcomes,recordings or event membership without assigning probabilities.All combinations being possible does not imply equiprobability or independence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: possible_outcomes_not_probabilities · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

original outcome index=0∈[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

recorded code=-19

Conditions: none

Each original outcome has one code;different outcomes may share a code.Codes do not redefine original indices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recording_total_mapping_row · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

original outcome index=1∈[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

recorded code=0

Conditions: none

Each original outcome has one code;different outcomes may share a code.Codes do not redefine original indices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recording_total_mapping_row · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

original outcome index=2∈[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

recorded code=-19

Conditions: none

Each original outcome has one code;different outcomes may share a code.Codes do not redefine original indices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recording_total_mapping_row · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

original outcome index=3∈[0, 1, 2, 3]

After

recorded code=19

Conditions: none

Each original outcome has one code;different outcomes may share a code.Codes do not redefine original indices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recording_total_mapping_row · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

recorded code=-19

After

[0, 2]

Conditions: none

List all original indices mapping to this code and align fibers with the sorted code list.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recording_preimage_fiber · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

recorded code=0

After

[1]

Conditions: none

List all original indices mapping to this code and align fibers with the sorted code list.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recording_preimage_fiber · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

recorded code=19

After

[3]

Conditions: none

List all original indices mapping to this code and align fibers with the sorted code list.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: recording_preimage_fiber · Uses: G001, S007

Reverse checks

  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([-19, 0, 19], [[0, 2], [1], [3]])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 0eafdb30d3f388dcb500db8af09d9392dc123f2d908103aabd32a49a8ed0db7b
  • candidate record SHA-256: 90bdaf8e780a4b07f03a4173d64f11a3986bbb5ad543a54e9c3675c0f00abc53
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: b6e05a3e8193a93db505dbf337528fca72e2e41528b1e92b698a3f0683d74289
  • question-first witness SHA-256: caa8693baf0b91acd09a20215d1aa6954ae513fc0b0814f26ac1c8c834b60d67
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON