Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 5227: Two Finite Principal-Filter Composition Images

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 27

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0009-05227 · q-20261008-advance-20261011-r07-tends-to-relation-0077

Original question and givens

The complete total map f:Fin(4)→Fin(3) has images=[0, 0, 1, 2] indexed from 0; Fin(4)={0,…,3}. Every table entry must lie in the target type. S=[0, 1, 2, 3]. principal(S) contains all source subsets containing S; the empty generator is allowed, and no NeBot premise is added. The complete map g:Fin(3)→Fin(8) has after=[0, 0, 0]. Give ((g∘f)(S), g(f(S))) as complete increasing sets.

  • G001 — The complete total map f:Fin(4)→Fin(3) has images=[0, 0, 1, 2] indexed from 0; Fin(4)={0,…,3}. Every table entry must lie in the target type. S=[0, 1, 2, 3]. principal(S) contains all source subsets containing S; the empty generator is allowed, and no NeBot premise is added. The complete map g:Fin(3)→Fin(8) has after=[0, 0, 0]. Give ((g∘f)(S), g(f(S))) as complete increasing sets.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

source index=0∈Fin(4)

After

image=0∈Fin(3)

Conditions: none

Every entry of the complete table must be legal;an entry being unused later does not waive total-map typing.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_principal_map_row · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

source index=1∈Fin(4)

After

image=0∈Fin(3)

Conditions: none

Every entry of the complete table must be legal;an entry being unused later does not waive total-map typing.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_principal_map_row · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

source index=2∈Fin(4)

After

image=1∈Fin(3)

Conditions: none

Every entry of the complete table must be legal;an entry being unused later does not waive total-map typing.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_principal_map_row · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

source index=3∈Fin(4)

After

image=2∈Fin(3)

Conditions: none

Every entry of the complete table must be legal;an entry being unused later does not waive total-map typing.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_principal_map_row · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

Fin(4)→Fin(3);S=[0, 1, 2, 3];full map=[0, 0, 1, 2]

After

principal(S)={A:S⊆A};empty generators allowed,no NeBot

Conditions: none

The declared convention allows empty S;its family of supersets then contains the empty set,and no proper-filter or NeBot condition is added.This is a finite principal-generator model,not a general sequence or point limit.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: finite_principal_generator_convention · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · implies

Before

source index=0∈Fin(3)

After

image=0∈Fin(8)

Conditions: none

Every entry of the complete table must be legal;an entry being unused later does not waive total-map typing.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_after_map_row · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

source index=1∈Fin(3)

After

image=0∈Fin(8)

Conditions: none

Every entry of the complete table must be legal;an entry being unused later does not waive total-map typing.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_after_map_row · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

source index=2∈Fin(3)

After

image=0∈Fin(8)

Conditions: none

Every entry of the complete table must be legal;an entry being unused later does not waive total-map typing.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_after_map_row · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · implies

Before

x=0;f(x)=0

After

g(f(x))=0

Conditions: none

The first route composes at each source element,retaining the direction of both maps.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_direct_composition_row · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

x=1;f(x)=0

After

g(f(x))=0

Conditions: none

The first route composes at each source element,retaining the direction of both maps.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_direct_composition_row · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · implies

Before

x=2;f(x)=1

After

g(f(x))=0

Conditions: none

The first route composes at each source element,retaining the direction of both maps.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_direct_composition_row · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · implies

Before

x=3;f(x)=2

After

g(f(x))=0

Conditions: none

The first route composes at each source element,retaining the direction of both maps.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_direct_composition_row · Uses: G001, S011

S013 · implies

Before

distinct intermediate image=0

After

g(y)=0

Conditions: none

The second route deduplicates f(S) before applying g;a total function assigns the same successor to the same intermediate value,so deduplication loses no final image.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_image_then_map_row · Uses: G001, S012

S014 · implies

Before

distinct intermediate image=1

After

g(y)=0

Conditions: none

The second route deduplicates f(S) before applying g;a total function assigns the same successor to the same intermediate value,so deduplication loses no final image.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_image_then_map_row · Uses: G001, S013

S015 · implies

Before

distinct intermediate image=2

After

g(y)=0

Conditions: none

The second route deduplicates f(S) before applying g;a total function assigns the same successor to the same intermediate value,so deduplication loses no final image.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_image_then_map_row · Uses: G001, S014

S016 · implies

Before

direct composite image=[0];image then map=[0]

After

(g∘f)(S)=g(f(S)) in this complete finite model

Conditions: none

Both routes give the same final image;empty S gives empty images on both routes.No general analytic limit or additional nonemptiness premise is introduced.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: principal_composition_image_identity · Uses: G001, S015

Reverse checks

  • S016 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S015 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([0], [0])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 8fdd13039d24d2325e525fbdc8e4d9626edf9de8bb5622da37c330cbcee279b4
  • candidate record SHA-256: 3abecb203284b01765432e03f478aea684e6f51ca0997719111cf46da5c439e8
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 71e7db519df31f3a164533e472e293cb64f001b475a8d002b4a5c2740a237b56
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 5a43f4f81b6256281f8d139a4010bbde127be803c528e5878857269c8f854462
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON