The complete total map f:Fin(8)→Fin(8) has images=[7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0] indexed from 0; Fin(8)={0,…,7}. Every table entry must lie in the target type. S=[0, 1]. principal(S) contains all source subsets containing S; the empty generator is allowed, and no NeBot premise is added. The complete map g:Fin(8)→Fin(8) has after=[7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]. Give ((g∘f)(S), g(f(S))) as complete increasing sets.
G001 — The complete total map f:Fin(8)→Fin(8) has images=[7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0] indexed from 0; Fin(8)={0,…,7}. Every table entry must lie in the target type. S=[0, 1]. principal(S) contains all source subsets containing S; the empty generator is allowed, and no NeBot premise is added. The complete map g:Fin(8)→Fin(8) has after=[7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]. Give ((g∘f)(S), g(f(S))) as complete increasing sets.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
The declared convention allows empty S;its family of supersets then contains the empty set,and no proper-filter or NeBot condition is added.This is a finite principal-generator model,not a general sequence or point limit.
The second route deduplicates f(S) before applying g;a total function assigns the same successor to the same intermediate value,so deduplication loses no final image.
The second route deduplicates f(S) before applying g;a total function assigns the same successor to the same intermediate value,so deduplication loses no final image.
direct composite image=[0, 1];image then map=[0, 1]
After
(g∘f)(S)=g(f(S)) in this complete finite model
Conditions: none
Both routes give the same final image;empty S gives empty images on both routes.No general analytic limit or additional nonemptiness premise is introduced.
S022 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S021 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S020 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S019 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S018 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S017 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S016 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S015 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
([0, 1], [0, 1])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.