Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0009-05480 · q-20261008-advance-20261012-r01-mathematical-induction-0005
N is indexed from 0; this is an explicitly finite induction protocol, not a universal proof. n=4. Give (index n of hypothesis P, index n+1 of the successor target), without claiming P holds.
G001 — N is indexed from 0; this is an explicitly finite induction protocol, not a universal proof. n=4. Give (index n of hypothesis P, index n+1 of the successor target), without claiming P holds.Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
natural indices start at0;finite induction protocol
After
index bookkeeping and finite values are not proofs of all P(n)
Conditions: none
Natural indices do not require nonnegative sequence values.Checking a finite range or a successor index does not supply proposition truth or an induction proof over all naturals.
Rule: finite_induction_claim_boundary · Uses: G001
Before
successor target index := sum(4, 1)
After
successor target index = 5
Conditions: none
Add1 to the current natural index to obtain the successor target.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
Before
hypothesis index=4
After
target index=5
Conditions: none
P(n) marks the induction hypothesis and P(n+1) the target;listing their indices does not assert either proposition.
Rule: hypothesis_vs_successor_target · Uses: G001, S002
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute successor target index with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.(4, 5)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 36c9f816a0104d276144178e86ab2cb5117ce24718e6f8bc2cc224a1ee19ce20candidate record SHA-256: becf107bb39da7370e746fe183049fe2c6a25a6388b8792b100c4192a7b6c776semantic review receipt SHA-256: 71e7db519df31f3a164533e472e293cb64f001b475a8d002b4a5c2740a237b56question-first witness SHA-256: 5a43f4f81b6256281f8d139a4010bbde127be803c528e5878857269c8f854462Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED