Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0010-05782 · q-20261008-advance-20261012-r03-proposition-0082
In a classical integer context, ordered pairs=[[-6, 0], [-5, 2], [-1, 0]]. P_i means a_i≤b_i. Candidate reported=[0, 1, 1], with 1 reporting True and 0 False. Give (actual truth values, report-match Yes/No values, signed a_i−b_i values).
G001 — In a classical integer context, ordered pairs=[[-6, 0], [-5, 2], [-1, 0]]. P_i means a_i≤b_i. Candidate reported=[0, 1, 1], with 1 reporting True and 0 False. Give (actual truth values, report-match Yes/No values, signed a_i−b_i values).Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
classical integer formulas with explicit binding/data
After
a truth verdict is not a delivered general proof object
Conditions: none
A false closed statement is still a proposition.These finite substitutions and comparison witnesses do not promote a truth label to a general formal proof or completeness of arbitrary inference rules.
Rule: proposition_truth_and_proof_scope · Uses: G001
Before
integer comparison difference0 := sub(-6, 0)
After
integer comparison difference0 = -6
Conditions: none
Compute a−b from the ordered pair,retaining zero and either sign.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
Before
row=0;a=-6;b=0;a−b=-6
After
statement=a≤b;truth=True
Conditions: none
Equality requires difference0 and ≤ requires a nonpositive difference;the signed difference supplies the exact comparison witness,not a candidate report.
Rule: closed_integer_statement_row · Uses: G001, S002
Before
integer comparison difference1 := sub(-5, 2)
After
integer comparison difference1 = -7
Conditions: none
Compute a−b from the ordered pair,retaining zero and either sign.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003
Before
row=1;a=-5;b=2;a−b=-7
After
statement=a≤b;truth=True
Conditions: none
Equality requires difference0 and ≤ requires a nonpositive difference;the signed difference supplies the exact comparison witness,not a candidate report.
Rule: closed_integer_statement_row · Uses: G001, S004
Before
integer comparison difference2 := sub(-1, 0)
After
integer comparison difference2 = -1
Conditions: none
Compute a−b from the ordered pair,retaining zero and either sign.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005
Before
row=2;a=-1;b=0;a−b=-1
After
statement=a≤b;truth=True
Conditions: none
Equality requires difference0 and ≤ requires a nonpositive difference;the signed difference supplies the exact comparison witness,not a candidate report.
Rule: closed_integer_statement_row · Uses: G001, S006
Before
row=0;reported bit=0;independently computed truth=True
After
report matches=No
Conditions: none
Compute truth from the given integers first,then audit the report;reported1 or0 is not itself comparison evidence.
Rule: report_vs_integer_witness · Uses: G001, S007
Before
row=1;reported bit=1;independently computed truth=True
After
report matches=Yes
Conditions: none
Compute truth from the given integers first,then audit the report;reported1 or0 is not itself comparison evidence.
Rule: report_vs_integer_witness · Uses: G001, S008
Before
row=2;reported bit=1;independently computed truth=True
After
report matches=Yes
Conditions: none
Compute truth from the given integers first,then audit the report;reported1 or0 is not itself comparison evidence.
Rule: report_vs_integer_witness · Uses: G001, S009
S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute integer comparison difference2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute integer comparison difference1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute integer comparison difference0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.([True, True, True], [No, Yes, Yes], [-6, -7, -1])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: f4395600d2819b2b11050280fe6add71ddbc2849990023afe97bbd9919fcecadcandidate record SHA-256: baab0edde9ba746a8a738df932ce474805d563df2c3deac214bc466af58b31b2semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0328166a2e335aac7a5fb34556e68c80ba7d16612e822b3999c8ac348a9ca06fquestion-first witness SHA-256: 0da18e4e6cf71ece5ec5f00dd0cd161217b6d251672bc0b46d79fe7e6253f5fcLean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED