Explore related knowledge and questions →
← Question derivation index · Original question batch
R0010-05880 · q-20261008-advance-20261012-r05-right-triangle-0030
Exact-degree candidate angles=[90, 45, 46]. Give (all positive with sum 180?, qualified and containing a 90° angle?, signed angle sum−180).
G001 — Exact-degree candidate angles=[90, 45, 46]. Give (all positive with sum 180?, qualified and containing a 90° angle?, signed angle sum−180).Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
Before
angle unit=degrees;exact declared protocol
After
check qualifications before geometric conclusions;no tolerance
Conditions: none
Use the declared exact angle protocol,not a sketch or floating tolerance.Candidate angle data do not by themselves construct a triangle.
Rule: exact_right_angle_protocol · Uses: G001
Before
three candidate angle sum := sum(90, 45, 46)
After
three candidate angle sum = 181
Conditions: none
Add the three ordered candidate angles completely;negative or zero values remain data to audit,not assumed valid triangle angles.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001
Before
angle sum minus180 := sub(181, 180)
After
angle sum minus180 = 1
Conditions: none
The signed angle-sum defect is total minus180.
Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002
Before
positive flags=[Yes, Yes, Yes];sum=181;defect=1
After
positive180-degree qualification=No
Conditions: none
The triangle-angle protocol requires all angles positive and sum exactly180;zero sum defect does not excuse a zero or negative angle.
Rule: positive_triangle_angle_qualification · Uses: G001, S003
Before
qualified=No;has90=Yes
After
qualified right-angle data=No
Conditions: none
First require valid triangle-angle data,then a90-degree angle;[90,90,0] has90s and sums to180 but is not qualified.
Rule: right_angle_requires_triangle_qualification · Uses: G001, S004
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute angle sum minus180 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute three candidate angle sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.(No, No, 1)
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.
input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50dboriginal question SHA-256: 1f705e73532c6cb6a19871729fce58d2ed1ca5b8b9f38754a48414375b95815fcandidate record SHA-256: 1530d00e8c5e033a1e9fd4e42f2b3bc99940febdfd89128943bfab73282f746csemantic review receipt SHA-256: 0328166a2e335aac7a5fb34556e68c80ba7d16612e822b3999c8ac348a9ca06fquestion-first witness SHA-256: 0da18e4e6cf71ece5ec5f00dd0cd161217b6d251672bc0b46d79fe7e6253f5fcLean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED