Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 5831: Labeled Right Vertex and Opposite Side

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 30

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0010-05831 · q-20261008-advance-20261012-r05-right-triangle-0056

Original question and givens

Exact degrees: vertex indices 1,2,3 have ordered angles=[6, 84, 90], already required positive, summing to 180, with a unique 90°. Give (right-vertex index, other two endpoint indices, their ordered acute angles).

  • G001 — Exact degrees: vertex indices 1,2,3 have ordered angles=[6, 84, 90], already required positive, summing to 180, with a unique 90°. Give (right-vertex index, other two endpoint indices, their ordered acute angles).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

angle unit=degrees;exact declared protocol

After

check qualifications before geometric conclusions;no tolerance

Conditions: none

Use the declared exact angle protocol,not a sketch or floating tolerance.Candidate angle data do not by themselves construct a triangle.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_right_angle_protocol · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

three candidate angle sum := sum(6, 84, 90)

After

three candidate angle sum = 180

Conditions: none

Add the three ordered candidate angles completely;negative or zero values remain data to audit,not assumed valid triangle angles.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

angle sum minus180 := sub(180, 180)

After

angle sum minus180 = 0

Conditions: none

The signed angle-sum defect is total minus180.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

positive flags=[Yes, Yes, Yes];sum=180;defect=0

After

positive180-degree qualification=Yes

Conditions: none

The triangle-angle protocol requires all angles positive and sum exactly180;zero sum defect does not excuse a zero or negative angle.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: positive_triangle_angle_qualification · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

original labeled angles=[6, 84, 90];right vertex=3

After

(3, [1, 2], [6, 84])

Conditions: none

Use the original1-based right-vertex index;the opposite-side endpoints are the other two vertices.Do not sort angles and thereby relabel vertices.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: marked_right_vertex_opposite_endpoints · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute angle sum minus180 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute three candidate angle sum with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(3, [1, 2], [6, 84])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 03989612213351ddfa9788e7a945766a6873722ae224cce6cd90b7c2e106780d
  • candidate record SHA-256: d0fa1cdf7985fb857c2dba53de70998e033a0659529b54854ae3f60e3161a387
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0328166a2e335aac7a5fb34556e68c80ba7d16612e822b3999c8ac348a9ca06f
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0da18e4e6cf71ece5ec5f00dd0cd161217b6d251672bc0b46d79fe7e6253f5fc
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON