Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 5551: Complete Ordered Finite Mapping Graph

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 28

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0010-05551 · q-20261008-advance-20261012-r07-function-mapping-0001

Original question and givens

The complete total map f:Fin(0)→Fin(0) has images=[] indexed from 0; Fin(0)=∅. Every table entry must lie in the target type. List every [i,f(i)] in source-index order, using [] for an empty source.

  • G001 — The complete total map f:Fin(0)→Fin(0) has images=[] indexed from 0; Fin(0)=∅. Every table entry must lie in the target type. List every [i,f(i)] in source-index order, using [] for an empty source.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

f:Fin(0)→Fin(0);source indices start at0

After

complete total map,not a partial program function

Conditions: none

Every legal source element has one codomain value.Fin(0) is empty;an outside query is ill-typed,not a hole of a partial function at a legal input.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: total_finite_mapping_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

[]

After

[]

Conditions: none

List[i,f(i)] for every source index;do not invent graph points for unused codomain elements.An empty source has an empty graph.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: complete_finite_function_graph · Uses: G001, S001

Reverse checks

  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

[]

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 299dbbfc7f99fc722ea0bbd91d14fb61fc9c6d909744d1ab2a5ba9694e142bf9
  • candidate record SHA-256: 72f37d081b94a206207560e7e95ce111c412a444297d453b28ac68b28e3451ee
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 0328166a2e335aac7a5fb34556e68c80ba7d16612e822b3999c8ac348a9ca06f
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 0da18e4e6cf71ece5ec5f00dd0cd161217b6d251672bc0b46d79fe7e6253f5fc
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON