Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 6163: Rational Candidates Split by Integer Eligibility

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 31

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0011-06163 · q-20261009-advance-20261013-r02-integer-0088

Original question and givens

Ordered representations=[0/1, 24/-2, 13/27, -14/-29] all have nonzero denominators. Give (integer-membership Yes/No list, integer values, reduced noninteger values), preserving original order within groups.

  • G001 — Ordered representations=[0/1, 24/-2, 13/27, -14/-29] all have nonzero denominators. Give (integer-membership Yes/No list, integer values, reduced noninteger values), preserving original order within groups.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

declared exact integer or rational-representation protocol

After

retain signs,ordered operands and original index order

Conditions: none

Check these finite data with exact integer arithmetic,without floating approximations or a claim to prove all integer-ring axioms.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: integer_arithmetic_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

position=0;raw fraction=[0, 1]

After

normalized=0/1;integer=Yes

Conditions: none

A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: normalized_rational_integer_qualification · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

position=1;raw fraction=[24, -2]

After

normalized=-12/1;integer=Yes

Conditions: none

A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: normalized_rational_integer_qualification · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · implies

Before

position=2;raw fraction=[13, 27]

After

normalized=13/27;integer=No

Conditions: none

A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: normalized_rational_integer_qualification · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · implies

Before

position=3;raw fraction=[-14, -29]

After

normalized=14/29;integer=No

Conditions: none

A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: normalized_rational_integer_qualification · Uses: G001, S004

Reverse checks

  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([Yes, Yes, No, No], [0, -12], [13/27, 14/29])

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: c9b1599c3f394beafaa6c3f12687ae2e10aca811cafc245b6aa84f88af7599ff
  • candidate record SHA-256: acb0e83f7fcd8c97a8edaff187b58e15ca81ebbe5477a30594265a3541cf9ca0
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: b9bbc1c947f477a9c4bb5a579368ac5265f2da4572ce612c30f3633ecaf4ae80
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 93f720df3ab3af13a792a3e6b443728e3c2a56276df839911f36569333236c55
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON