Ordered representations=[8/1, 40/-2, 21/43, -22/-45] all have nonzero denominators. Give (integer-membership Yes/No list, integer values, reduced noninteger values), preserving original order within groups.
G001 — Ordered representations=[8/1, 40/-2, 21/43, -22/-45] all have nonzero denominators. Give (integer-membership Yes/No list, integer values, reduced noninteger values), preserving original order within groups.
Definition and scope
Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.
declared exact integer or rational-representation protocol
After
retain signs,ordered operands and original index order
Conditions: none
Check these finite data with exact integer arithmetic,without floating approximations or a claim to prove all integer-ring axioms.
Step identifiers and dependencies
Rule: integer_arithmetic_scope · Uses: G001
S002 · implies
Before
position=0;raw fraction=[8, 1]
After
normalized=8/1;integer=Yes
Conditions: none
A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.
A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.
A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.
A nonzero negative denominator is valid.Normalize to a reduced value with positive denominator;denominator1 means integer.Preserve original relative order within each group.
S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
Result
([Yes, Yes, No, No], [8, -20], [21/43, 22/45])
The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.
This question review and source binding
Review date: 2026-10-26
Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.