Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 6028: Declared Event and Relative Complement Partition

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 31

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0011-06028 · q-20261009-advance-20261013-r06-event-0003

Original question and givens

S=Fin(5)={0,…,4}; the event family is explicitly F=P(S). E=[0]⊆S. Give (increasing E, increasing S\E, n).

  • G001 — S=Fin(5)={0,…,4}; the event family is explicitly F=P(S). E=[0]⊆S. Give (increasing E, increasing S\E, n).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

S=Fin(5)=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4];declared event model=full_powerset

After

finite S alone does not specify its event family or a probability law

Conditions: none

A finite sample space does not automatically choose F=P(S).Use the declared event family;set data alone give no probabilities,equiprobability or independence.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: declared_finite_event_family · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

E=[0];S=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

After

S\E=[1, 2, 3, 4]

Conditions: none

Take the complement only inside S,without outside values;the explicitly declared F=P(S) contains this complement.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: event_complement_relative_space · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · implies

Before

([0], [1, 2, 3, 4])

After

disjoint union is S;|S|=5

Conditions: none

The event and complement are disjoint and cover S.The final field is n,not a probability;no probability law was supplied.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: event_complement_partition_identity · Uses: G001, S002

Reverse checks

  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

([0], [1, 2, 3, 4], 5)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 048eabe9c8275a128bc88739190adc7b67f51852ff6c4049d2c63cb860ede284
  • candidate record SHA-256: 9f75600c636c920c649e8be62620d475ee4856fb200111105a904a0866d76c02
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: b9bbc1c947f477a9c4bb5a579368ac5265f2da4572ce612c30f3633ecaf4ae80
  • question-first witness SHA-256: 93f720df3ab3af13a792a3e6b443728e3c2a56276df839911f36569333236c55
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON