Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 6529: Cyclic versus Swapped Signed Coordinate Crosses

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 33

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0012-06529 · q-20261009-advance-20261013-r07-triangle-0054

Original question and givens

In one equal-unit orthogonal Euclidean frame, labeled A,B,C have indices 1,2,3 and points=[[0, 0], [1, 0], [0, -9]]. The points are distinct and noncollinear. Give signed integers (crossABC, crossBCA, crossACB), distinguishing cyclic and swapped labels.

  • G001 — In one equal-unit orthogonal Euclidean frame, labeled A,B,C have indices 1,2,3 and points=[[0, 0], [1, 0], [0, -9]]. The points are distinct and noncollinear. Give signed integers (crossABC, crossBCA, crossACB), distinguishing cyclic and swapped labels.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

[[0, 0], [1, 0], [0, -9]]

After

original vertex labels1,2,3 in an equal-unit orthogonal Euclidean frame

Conditions: none

Retain the original A,B,C order;the squared-coordinate formula uses equal units and orthogonal axes.Do not read values from a sketch or assume candidate vertices already form a triangle.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: labelled_triangle_coordinate_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

[[0, 0], [1, 0], [0, -9]]

After

three distinct points=Yes

Conditions: none

Check distinctness separately from noncollinearity;collinear points may be distinct,while repeated vertices do not form a proper triangle.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: distinct_triangle_vertex_check · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

ABC first vector component0 := sub(1, 0)

After

ABC first vector component0 = 1

Conditions: none

The first edge vector is the second vertex minus the first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

ABC first vector component1 := sub(0, 0)

After

ABC first vector component1 = 0

Conditions: none

The first edge vector is the second vertex minus the first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

ABC second vector component0 := sub(0, 0)

After

ABC second vector component0 = 0

Conditions: none

The second edge vector is the third vertex minus that same first vertex.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

ABC second vector component1 := sub(-9, 0)

After

ABC second vector component1 = -9

Conditions: none

The second edge vector is the third vertex minus that same first vertex.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

ABC cross positive term := mul(1, -9)

After

ABC cross positive term = -9

Conditions: none

Compute u_x v_y first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · calculation

Before

ABC cross negative term := mul(0, 0)

After

ABC cross negative term = 0

Conditions: none

Compute u_y v_x separately,retaining subtraction for the next step.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S007

S009 · calculation

Before

ABC signed determinant := sub(-9, 0)

After

ABC signed determinant = -9

Conditions: none

Subtract to obtain signed double area;do not erase label orientation with an absolute value.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S008

S010 · implies

Before

distinct=Yes;signed determinant=-9

After

proper triangle=Yes

Conditions: none

A proper triangle needs distinct vertices and nonzero determinant;this judges the supplied coordinates,not a general geometric construction proof.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: triangle_nondegenerate_coordinate_qualification · Uses: G001, S009

S011 · calculation

Before

BCA first vector component0 := sub(0, 1)

After

BCA first vector component0 = -1

Conditions: none

The first edge vector is the second vertex minus the first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S010

S012 · calculation

Before

BCA first vector component1 := sub(-9, 0)

After

BCA first vector component1 = -9

Conditions: none

The first edge vector is the second vertex minus the first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S011

S013 · calculation

Before

BCA second vector component0 := sub(0, 1)

After

BCA second vector component0 = -1

Conditions: none

The second edge vector is the third vertex minus that same first vertex.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S012

S014 · calculation

Before

BCA second vector component1 := sub(0, 0)

After

BCA second vector component1 = 0

Conditions: none

The second edge vector is the third vertex minus that same first vertex.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S013

S015 · calculation

Before

BCA cross positive term := mul(-1, 0)

After

BCA cross positive term = 0

Conditions: none

Compute u_x v_y first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S014

S016 · calculation

Before

BCA cross negative term := mul(-9, -1)

After

BCA cross negative term = 9

Conditions: none

Compute u_y v_x separately,retaining subtraction for the next step.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S015

S017 · calculation

Before

BCA signed determinant := sub(0, 9)

After

BCA signed determinant = -9

Conditions: none

Subtract to obtain signed double area;do not erase label orientation with an absolute value.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S016

S018 · calculation

Before

ACB first vector component0 := sub(0, 0)

After

ACB first vector component0 = 0

Conditions: none

The first edge vector is the second vertex minus the first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S017

S019 · calculation

Before

ACB first vector component1 := sub(-9, 0)

After

ACB first vector component1 = -9

Conditions: none

The first edge vector is the second vertex minus the first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S018

S020 · calculation

Before

ACB second vector component0 := sub(1, 0)

After

ACB second vector component0 = 1

Conditions: none

The second edge vector is the third vertex minus that same first vertex.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S019

S021 · calculation

Before

ACB second vector component1 := sub(0, 0)

After

ACB second vector component1 = 0

Conditions: none

The second edge vector is the third vertex minus that same first vertex.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S020

S022 · calculation

Before

ACB cross positive term := mul(0, 0)

After

ACB cross positive term = 0

Conditions: none

Compute u_x v_y first.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S021

S023 · calculation

Before

ACB cross negative term := mul(-9, 1)

After

ACB cross negative term = -9

Conditions: none

Compute u_y v_x separately,retaining subtraction for the next step.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S022

S024 · calculation

Before

ACB signed determinant := sub(0, -9)

After

ACB signed determinant = 9

Conditions: none

Subtract to obtain signed double area;do not erase label orientation with an absolute value.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S023

S025 · implies

Before

crossABC=-9;crossBCA=-9;crossACB=9

After

cyclic order preserves sign;one transposition reverses it

Conditions: none

Each ordering was evaluated separately;a cyclic relabeling is not a two-vertex swap.Do not silently replace negative orientation by positive area.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: cyclic_vs_swapped_triangle_labels · Uses: G001, S024

Reverse checks

  • S025 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S024 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ACB signed determinant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S023 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ACB cross negative term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S022 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ACB cross positive term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S021 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ACB second vector component1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S020 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ACB second vector component0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S019 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ACB first vector component1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S018 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ACB first vector component0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S017 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute BCA signed determinant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S016 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute BCA cross negative term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S015 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute BCA cross positive term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S014 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute BCA second vector component1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S013 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute BCA second vector component0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S012 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute BCA first vector component1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S011 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute BCA first vector component0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S010 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S009 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ABC signed determinant with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ABC cross negative term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ABC cross positive term with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ABC second vector component1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ABC second vector component0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ABC first vector component1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute ABC first vector component0 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(-9, -9, 9)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 1a8693c1fd41d9130861e96a1bead313e903431c59b1f5fb01e4aa3dbf156147
  • candidate record SHA-256: aecf4773eb95d95bc1b0a33519f35e58856f61127884ce94560797f996d2aaef
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 90dbc494b2d34ef51f412dcff63cfcc1a2215d038bff71f38f5dded4c64faf00
  • question-first witness SHA-256: b72a3b8bcf10f584396e0dd5198c657b0934a71864e5a3fa6321d7a613aef9f9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON