Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 6657: Original Rational Equation Sides and Defect

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 34

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0012-06657 · q-20261010-advance-20261014-r03-equation-0007

Original question and givens

Use the original equation’s common rational domain. L(x)=((-6)x+(7))/(3), R(x)=(-1)x+(-6), q≠0, x=7/2. Give (L, R, L−R, does the original equation hold?). Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, retaining /1 for integers.

  • G001 — Use the original equation’s common rational domain. L(x)=((-6)x+(7))/(3), R(x)=(-1)x+(-6), q≠0, x=7/2. Give (L, R, L−R, does the original equation hold?). Use exact reduced fractions with positive denominators, retaining /1 for integers.

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

common rational domain with original equation definitions

After

evaluate/classify the given model without enlarging its original domain

Conditions: none

Original definedness precedes substitution and transformations.Check the declared model,not arbitrary equation solving inferred from cross multiplication or one-point values.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: original_rational_equation_scope · Uses: G001

S002 · calculation

Before

original left numerator linear product := mul(-6, 7/2)

After

original left numerator linear product = -21

Conditions: none

Substitute the specified x into this side's coefficient product.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

original left numerator affine value := sum(-21, 7)

After

original left numerator affine value = -14

Conditions: none

Then add this side's own constant,not the other side's.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

original right linear product := mul(-1, 7/2)

After

original right linear product = -7/2

Conditions: none

Substitute the specified x into this side's coefficient product.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

original right affine value := sum(-7/2, -6)

After

original right affine value = -19/2

Conditions: none

Then add this side's own constant,not the other side's.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

original left quotient := div(-14, 3)

After

original left quotient = -14/3

Conditions: none

The original constant denominator q is nonzero;negative q is also handled exactly.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · calculation

Before

original two-side residual := sub(-14/3, -19/2)

After

original two-side residual = 29/6

Conditions: none

Subtract the original right side from the original left;residual0 means the equation holds at this x.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S006

S008 · implies

Before

q=3≠0;x=7/2;L−R=29/6

After

original equation at this x=No

Conditions: none

This audits the legal original equation at the specified point;one-point agreement is not an identity for every x.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: original_fraction_equation_point_check · Uses: G001, S007

Reverse checks

  • S008 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute original two-side residual with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute original left quotient with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute original right affine value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute original right linear product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute original left numerator affine value with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute original left numerator linear product with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(-14/3, -19/2, 29/6, No)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: 3d6f79e3d2bcc6f455111463ea533457a88ca3653a40e2973cabaa09dd37d713
  • candidate record SHA-256: 74b0ae7e3fcf5b5ac48674c89f4e3324bb4414f88456f61479e03741cc335415
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 90dbc494b2d34ef51f412dcff63cfcc1a2215d038bff71f38f5dded4c64faf00
  • question-first witness SHA-256: b72a3b8bcf10f584396e0dd5198c657b0934a71864e5a3fa6321d7a613aef9f9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON