Explore related knowledge and questions →

Question 6703: Adjacent Exact Factorials and Their Ratio

On this page
  1. Original question and givens
  2. Definition and scope
  3. Step-by-step derivation
  4. Reverse checks
  5. Result
  6. This question review and source binding

Return to catalogue page 34

← Question derivation index · Original question batch

R0012-06703 · q-20261010-advance-20261014-r05-factorial-0003

Original question and givens

N begins at 0, F(0)=0!=1, and factorials use exact integer arithmetic, not floating point. n=2. Give decimal integers (F(n), F(n+1), F(n+1)/F(n)).

  • G001 — N begins at 0, F(0)=0!=1, and factorials use exact integer arithmetic, not floating point. n=2. Give decimal integers (F(n), F(n+1), F(n+1)/F(n)).

Definition and scope

Use the original question domain, assumptions and cited MKO definitions. This item has second-context mathematical and bilingual review, with the model, answer and every arithmetic step independently recomputed from the original parameters; the source question remains a candidate.

Step-by-step derivation

S001 · implies

Before

N includes0;F(0)=1;F(j)=j·F(j−1)

After

exact integer products,not floating values or a permutation proof

Conditions: none

Use empty product1 and integer factor multiplication,retaining large values exactly.This finite recurrence audit is not a general proof of permutation counting.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_factorial_protocol · Uses: G001

S002 · implies

Before

actual factorial:start at F(0)

After

F(0)=1

Conditions: none

The product of zero factors is1,not0;this is the successor recurrence's base.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: factorial_empty_product_base · Uses: G001, S001

S003 · calculation

Before

actual factorial through factor1 := mul(1, 1)

After

actual factorial through factor1 = 1

Conditions: none

Multiply the preceding factorial by the new positive integer factor,retaining every exact intermediate.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S002

S004 · calculation

Before

actual factorial through factor2 := mul(1, 2)

After

actual factorial through factor2 = 2

Conditions: none

Multiply the preceding factorial by the new positive integer factor,retaining every exact intermediate.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S003

S005 · calculation

Before

true successor factorial := mul(3, 2)

After

true successor factorial = 6

Conditions: none

Compute F(n+1)=(n+1)F(n).

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S004

S006 · calculation

Before

successor factorial ratio := div(6, 2)

After

successor factorial ratio = 3

Conditions: none

Since F(n)>0,division is legal and the exact ratio is n+1.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: exact_rational_arithmetic · Uses: G001, S005

S007 · implies

Before

F(2)=2>0;F(3)=6

After

ratio=3

Conditions: none

This includes n=0 with F(0)=F(1)=1,without0!=0 or floating approximations.

Step identifiers and dependencies

Rule: positive_factorial_adjacent_ratio · Uses: G001, S006

Reverse checks

  • S007 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S006 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute successor factorial ratio with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S005 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute true successor factorial with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S004 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute actual factorial through factor2 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S003 · premise_and_result_audit — Recompute actual factorial through factor1 with exact rational arithmetic, not rounded decimals.
  • S002 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.
  • S001 · premise_and_result_audit — Check against the original data and this step's premises; a one-way implication is not an equivalence.

Result

(2, 6, 3)

The full substitutions and premise checks give the original answer; source identity,format and status are unchanged.

This question review and source binding

Review date: 2026-10-26

Original questions, answers, step expressions, numeric ASTs and historical records are retained. Source candidate labels remain historical and are not overwritten as formal proof.

Source hashes and review receipts
  • input commit: 0f7be61e2c22317a4075561dc822c87d881a50db
  • original question SHA-256: fadcc885c14c437504c2898194b7f1efc292307e04517523f6209e321a0e18a8
  • candidate record SHA-256: d4fd787632821b3d8867d164b243c91b30f0735745e256e2a0eeea48495dbb8a
  • semantic review receipt SHA-256: 90dbc494b2d34ef51f412dcff63cfcc1a2215d038bff71f38f5dded4c64faf00
  • question-first witness SHA-256: b72a3b8bcf10f584396e0dd5198c657b0934a71864e5a3fa6321d7a613aef9f9
  • Lean: NOT_RUN · human review: NOT_PERFORMED
Same-source full JSON